Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
124 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />
undershaft [in towering excitement] It is <strong>the</strong> Undershaft inheritance.<br />
(3:120)<br />
“How do you suppose it got <strong>the</strong>re?” is not a question worthy of Cusins,<br />
but it allows Undershaft to makes his paradoxical point.<br />
This conflict of purpose may be <strong>the</strong> reason Shaw found it necessary to<br />
do <strong>the</strong> must extensive revision he had yet undertaken of any play since<br />
The Philanderer. The changes were of a different nature from those applied<br />
to <strong>the</strong> early play. The revisions of The Philanderer tended to cut out Shaw’s<br />
penchant for letting <strong>the</strong> characters dictate to <strong>the</strong>ir author where to take<br />
<strong>the</strong> play and to bring it more into <strong>the</strong> familiar, structured pattern of farcical<br />
comedy, that is, to make it less “organic” and more conventional; <strong>the</strong><br />
changes made to Major Barbara help resolve potential conflicts between<br />
Shaw’s “organic” and didactic tendencies and so help make it even more<br />
Shavian, ra<strong>the</strong>r than more conventional. The most sweeping changes were<br />
to <strong>the</strong> second scene of <strong>the</strong> third act, which was entirely rewritten. Shaw<br />
was right in his dissatisfaction with <strong>the</strong> original, for <strong>the</strong> first draft was<br />
dramatically inferior to <strong>the</strong> final product, but missteps can be illuminating.<br />
1 One of <strong>the</strong> most interesting changes is an alteration in <strong>the</strong> moral and<br />
intellectual debate between Cusins and Undershaft. In <strong>the</strong> original draft<br />
(called <strong>the</strong> “Derry” manuscript), Undershaft is unambiguously <strong>the</strong> winner<br />
and Cusins is clearly brought around to Undershaft’s point of view. In <strong>the</strong><br />
final version, Cusins is changed but remains his own man at <strong>the</strong> end. The<br />
resulting intellectual ambiguity is interesting, and <strong>the</strong> exact nature of its<br />
significance is an important question in determining <strong>the</strong> play’s meaning.<br />
Anomalies in <strong>the</strong> Action<br />
The dramatic structure of <strong>the</strong> play is especially unusual. In all of <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />
plays <strong>the</strong> action is a clear development of <strong>the</strong> desires of <strong>the</strong> characters<br />
in conflict with each o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>ir circumstances: classic examples<br />
for a teacher of play analysis. Caesar and Cleopatra may appear an exception,<br />
but its episodic nature is merely a shell for <strong>the</strong> true action: <strong>the</strong> partly<br />
successful education of Cleopatra. When Shaw uses a conventional “complication”<br />
to change <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> action, it helps complete <strong>the</strong> picture,<br />
showing us more fully how <strong>the</strong> characters behave by altering <strong>the</strong>ir circumstances.<br />
The change in <strong>the</strong> status of <strong>the</strong> slums proposed by Lickcheese in<br />
Widowers’ Houses and <strong>the</strong> arrival of <strong>the</strong> American navy in Captain Brassbound’s<br />
Conversion both change <strong>the</strong> action in order to illuminate it. The