28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />

this unity; to diminish consciousness is to reduce <strong>the</strong>m. If one imagines a<br />

series of such reductions, it becomes clear how <strong>the</strong>y shrink awareness.<br />

Eliminate everything from consciousness except your visual field: all<br />

thoughts, physical sensations, all perceptions except <strong>the</strong> visual. You can<br />

merely see and cannot even think about what you are seeing. You are still<br />

conscious, but it is a reduced sort of consciousness. Reduce that consciousness<br />

even fur<strong>the</strong>r to only <strong>the</strong> couch in <strong>the</strong> center of <strong>the</strong> field of vision, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r still, shrinking it finally to a single pixel of visual information.<br />

Consciousness, at that point, would seem to have disappeared entirely,<br />

for without something to contrast it with a single bit of information<br />

is meaningless.<br />

This “connectedness” of <strong>the</strong> contents of our conscious minds is not <strong>the</strong><br />

only unique aspect of our mental lives. There is <strong>the</strong> whole array of atomic<br />

mental elements psychologists sometimes call “qualia”: <strong>the</strong> various distinct<br />

sensation of consciousness, like <strong>the</strong> color blue and <strong>the</strong> sound of a<br />

single note of a flute. We know <strong>the</strong>se things are attributes of our minds,<br />

not of <strong>the</strong> physical world, which has been deprived by modern science of<br />

all but ma<strong>the</strong>matical characteristics. But <strong>the</strong>re is no reason why <strong>the</strong> atomic<br />

(that is, irreducible) elements of <strong>the</strong> physical world might not have a oneto-one<br />

correspondence with <strong>the</strong> atomic elements of <strong>the</strong> mind. <strong>That</strong> is an<br />

unfamiliar concept, but it is not unreasonable—unless, that is, you assume<br />

that <strong>the</strong> material world can have no qualities that are invisible to us.<br />

Something like that would have to be true if <strong>the</strong> materialist view of<br />

mind is even partly correct. On <strong>the</strong> materialist view, in a perfect neurological<br />

science a living brain could be examined (using some technology presently<br />

unimaginable), and scientists could say with perfect confidence,<br />

“This patient is thinking about a green two-story house.” Not only that,<br />

<strong>the</strong> scientists would have to be able to identify <strong>the</strong> source of all of <strong>the</strong><br />

various elements of that patient’s conscious experience: each “pixel” (as it<br />

were) of information in <strong>the</strong> subject’s mind. Yet even if <strong>the</strong>y could achieve<br />

such an amazing feat, <strong>the</strong>y would not be able to understand <strong>the</strong> peculiar<br />

structure of consciousness because it is a structure alien to <strong>the</strong> conceptual<br />

world of materialist science. The structures of <strong>the</strong> physical world—like <strong>the</strong><br />

crystalline lattice of molecules in a solid—are all defined in time and space.<br />

The relationship of each molecule to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, or of <strong>the</strong> atoms within <strong>the</strong><br />

molecules, is strictly a matter of having a constant distance through time<br />

from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. The elements of awareness are related in an entirely different<br />

way, a way that is unique and thus cannot be described by comparison<br />

to anything. All we can say is that <strong>the</strong> molecules do not have—or at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!