28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Will and Its Responsibilities 43<br />

not in any way expressions of <strong>the</strong> rational. In fact, <strong>the</strong> scrupulous application<br />

of reason reveals that a world composed of matter alone has no more<br />

room in it for pain and pleasure than for spiritual transport or religious<br />

ecstasy. The world of matter, as matter is conventionally understood, is a<br />

world indifferent to its own state. The existence of pain and pleasure in our<br />

world means that we are part of a universe that is capable of preferring one<br />

state of existence to ano<strong>the</strong>r. Pain is a teleological principle quite as much<br />

as is <strong>the</strong> will to live or to nurture o<strong>the</strong>r living things. All such manifestations<br />

of <strong>the</strong> world-will are of an entirely different order than <strong>the</strong> cold,<br />

blind laws of physics.<br />

The Will to Believe<br />

Shaw’s objection to what he called rationalism was not limited to distaste<br />

for <strong>the</strong> idolatry of egoism implicit in <strong>the</strong> utilitarian ethic; he disputed it on<br />

epistemological as well as ethical grounds, and in so doing he attacked <strong>the</strong><br />

very reasonableness of rationalism. Shaw insisted that <strong>the</strong> will determines<br />

belief as well as behavior. This is a direct assault on <strong>the</strong> rationalist’s cardinal<br />

point of honor, which is that he follows where <strong>the</strong> facts and logical<br />

thinking lead ra<strong>the</strong>r than along <strong>the</strong> easy path of wishful thinking. Shaw<br />

wrote in 1891 to <strong>the</strong> secularist E. C. Chapman:<br />

I agree with you that <strong>the</strong> motto “We seek for Truth” sufficiently<br />

indicated <strong>the</strong> distinction between <strong>the</strong> old positive method of <strong>the</strong><br />

Secularist and <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological method of <strong>the</strong> Christian. But that does<br />

not dispose of my objection that we do not seek for truth in <strong>the</strong> abstract.<br />

The Rev. Benjamin Waugh seeks for facts that will support his<br />

will-to-believe that secularists are worse men than Christians. Our<br />

friend John Robertson seeks for facts that support his will-to-believe<br />

that Materialist-Rationalists are <strong>the</strong> only honest Secularists, and that<br />

all o<strong>the</strong>rs are hypocrites and time servers. The result is that nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Waugh or Robertson have ever discovered one of <strong>the</strong> glaring facts<br />

that contradict <strong>the</strong>m. . . . They have made statements which are false,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> rebutting facts staring <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> face. . . . Therefore all I ask<br />

both men to do is to give up pretending that <strong>the</strong>y “seek for Truth.”<br />

Every man sees what he looks for, and hears what he listens for, and<br />

nothing else. (Collected Letters 1:301) 3<br />

Thus <strong>the</strong> will not only determines values but governs, or at least guides,<br />

belief. Shaw goes on to make an even stronger statement, asserting that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!