28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8<br />

Catching Up with Shaw<br />

Shaw proclaimed <strong>the</strong> coming of <strong>the</strong> superman; he did not claim to be one.<br />

He embraced realism and rejected ideals but failed as a prophet largely<br />

because when confronted with facts that fiercely challenged his beliefs he<br />

denied <strong>the</strong> facts ra<strong>the</strong>r than facing <strong>the</strong>m and defeating <strong>the</strong>m. The first half<br />

of <strong>the</strong> twentieth century was not a congenial epoch for one who insisted<br />

that all human beings are equally children of God. For Shaw <strong>the</strong> propensity<br />

to commit evil was a disease of <strong>the</strong> soul, not its natural state, and<br />

diseases have cures. He knew that <strong>the</strong> evil which spread throughout Europe<br />

during <strong>the</strong> world wars and <strong>the</strong> malignant interlude between <strong>the</strong>m<br />

was <strong>the</strong> disease of Bill Walker’s shriveled soul in an epidemic state, infecting<br />

whole societies and political systems, but he failed to see how virulent<br />

<strong>the</strong> cancerous malady had become. Wishing to win us over to Major Barbara’s<br />

faith in evil’s vulnerability to <strong>the</strong> curative power of good, he underestimated<br />

<strong>the</strong> difficulty of <strong>the</strong> obstacle. And ironically, <strong>the</strong> gulf between his<br />

understanding and that of <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world that made him a prophet of<br />

such vision may have led him into <strong>the</strong> folly which Archer claimed was his<br />

natural condition: <strong>the</strong> blindness of apriorist thinking. The man who utterly<br />

rejected principles became so used to <strong>the</strong> idea that he was right and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs wrong that he ceased to check <strong>the</strong> facts honestly. He had been right<br />

to dismiss as hysterical nonsense <strong>the</strong> stories of German atrocities spread<br />

by English propaganda during World War I; he dismissed similar characterization<br />

of <strong>the</strong> evils of Nazism, and he was wrong.<br />

His glaring error in <strong>the</strong> specifics obscures <strong>the</strong> surprising fact that he was<br />

right about <strong>the</strong> general conditions that produce political evil: Nazism justified<br />

its evils with idealism and only <strong>the</strong>reby was able to infect an entire<br />

society. Shaw is still worth heeding, despite his mistakes, because <strong>the</strong> ideals<br />

that produced <strong>the</strong> Nazi atrocities—ideals he opposed—are still with us.<br />

Nazi racial concepts were built on Social Darwinism, and Social Darwinism<br />

is grounded in <strong>the</strong> metaphysics of scientific materialism, a philosophy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!