28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />

that those seven hundred “Philistines” are quite as free from deluding ideals<br />

as is <strong>the</strong> one realist. <strong>That</strong> should warn us to beware of feeling smugly<br />

superior to nineteenth-century ideals. It is as easy to laugh at antiquated<br />

ideals as at discarded fashions, but our children will laugh as heartily and<br />

as justly at our own intellectual as well as physical garments. We wear our<br />

clo<strong>the</strong>s and our morals more loosely now than <strong>the</strong>n, and that is no doubt a<br />

good thing, but idealism is by no means dead; and an age in which presidential<br />

elections are decided by <strong>the</strong> intensity of a candidate’s commitment<br />

to flag worship should pause before condemning ano<strong>the</strong>r age as idolatrous.<br />

Realism, in Shaw’s sense, is as distinctly abnormal today as it was one<br />

hundred years ago.<br />

Idealism is seductive because it provides masks for realities we dare not<br />

face. This is true of liberating ideals as well as enslaving ones; it is true for<br />

<strong>the</strong> woman who made an ideal of her will to become a ma<strong>the</strong>matician as<br />

well as for <strong>the</strong> moralist who idealizes matrimony because he cannot face<br />

<strong>the</strong> failure of his own marriage. Idealism is a mask whe<strong>the</strong>r it is used to<br />

deny our wills or to liberate <strong>the</strong>m. In <strong>the</strong> former case it allows us to hide<br />

from our sense of failure and inadequacy. In <strong>the</strong> latter it provides a hedge<br />

against responsibility. It allows us to avoid saying, “I will do it because I<br />

want to.” Thus both forms of idealism are a denial of self and of responsibility.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r we thwart our wills or enable <strong>the</strong>m, ideals provide a barrier<br />

between ourselves and our wills. <strong>That</strong> is why <strong>the</strong>y are pernicious.<br />

Shaw’s rejection of idealism is inseparable from his belief in <strong>the</strong> inevitable<br />

primacy of <strong>the</strong> individual will. It led as well to something he called<br />

“moral equality.” On those three solid columns—realism, individualism,<br />

and equality—his entire philosophy was carefully and logically built. For<br />

all <strong>the</strong>ir logic and inevitability, however, some of those developments still<br />

have <strong>the</strong> power to startle and even to shock.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!