28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Consistency<br />

3<br />

The Will and Its Responsibilities 39<br />

The Will and Its Responsibilities<br />

G. K. Chesterton dismissed Shaw’s early exposition of his philosophy as<br />

“Schopenhauer standing on his head” (186). His witticism neatly summed<br />

up <strong>the</strong> popular view that Shaw took a complex and recondite metaphysic,<br />

reduced it to a frivolous formula, and converted <strong>the</strong> scowl of pessimism<br />

into a grin of anarchism by turning it upside down. Schopenhauer on his<br />

head is ridiculous, and <strong>the</strong> easiest way to trivialize something is to identify<br />

it with something preposterous. The image of <strong>the</strong> irrepressibly cheerful<br />

Shaw as a topsy-turvy parody of <strong>the</strong> eternally gloomy Schopenhauer<br />

seems appealingly right but is actually misleadingly wrong. Realism, not<br />

Schopenhauer, led Shaw to his belief in <strong>the</strong> primacy of <strong>the</strong> will.<br />

Despite his attacks on Shaw, Chesterton understood him better than<br />

most. He said so. The introduction to his book on Shaw, obviously intended<br />

as an object lesson for its subject, consists entirely of two sentences: “Most<br />

people ei<strong>the</strong>r say that <strong>the</strong>y agree with <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw or that <strong>the</strong>y do not<br />

understand him. I am <strong>the</strong> only person who understands him, and I do not<br />

agree with him.” Despite his disagreement, Chesterton hit upon <strong>the</strong> fundamental<br />

truth that Shaw knew nothing of genuine paradox and that all<br />

“his splendid vistas and startling suggestions arise from carrying some<br />

clear principle fur<strong>the</strong>r than it has yet been carried. His madness is all consistency,<br />

not inconsistency” (173).<br />

Shaw universalized his logical development as a thinker by presenting<br />

it as a historical progression. He repeated this tale numerous times but<br />

most clearly in <strong>the</strong> treatises collected in Major Critical Essays. Religious<br />

belief, Shaw said, gave way to rationalism, which <strong>the</strong>n succumbed to Schopenhauer’s<br />

“will.” As intellectual history it is unconvincing and has re-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!