28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes<br />

Chapter 1. A Creed for Living: A <strong>Faith</strong> <strong>That</strong> <strong>Fits</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Facts</strong><br />

1. The Quintessence of Ibsenism is most readily available to students of Shaw<br />

in two different collections of Shaw’s writings: Shaw and Ibsen, edited by J. L.<br />

Wisenthal, and Selected Non-Dramatic Writings of <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw, edited by Dan H.<br />

Laurence. These two volumes are not redundant, even with respect to <strong>the</strong> Quintessence.<br />

As is by now notorious, Shaw was an inveterate reviser of his own work. The<br />

Laurence collection is preferable if you want <strong>the</strong> original version of <strong>the</strong> work, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> Wisenthal edition gives a better view of how Shaw changed <strong>the</strong> book over <strong>the</strong><br />

years. Both versions are available in The Drama Observed, a four- volume compendium<br />

edited by <strong>Bernard</strong> Dukore, but this useful yet expensive edition is less likely to<br />

be found in private collections. For <strong>the</strong> sake of clarity and convenience, references to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Quintessence will be to <strong>the</strong> Wisenthal edition unless o<strong>the</strong>rwise noted.<br />

Chapter 2. Realism<br />

1. Since this is a book about Shaw’s philosophy as well as his religion, it might be<br />

wise to forestall a possible confusion. “Realism” and “idealism” are standard terms<br />

in philosophy which are usually thought of as opposites, but while I refer to <strong>the</strong><br />

fundamental Shavian view of <strong>the</strong> world as “realism,” and will define it largely in<br />

terms of its contrast with what Shaw calls idealism, <strong>the</strong>se are in no way <strong>the</strong> same as<br />

<strong>the</strong> realism and idealism of ordinary philosophical discussion. We will unfortunately<br />

need to use <strong>the</strong> terms in <strong>the</strong>ir philosophical sense in <strong>the</strong> final chapters. Despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> possibility of confusion, <strong>the</strong> terms are made inevitable by <strong>the</strong> way Shaw<br />

uses <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Chapter 3. The Will and Its Responsibilities<br />

1. There are two earlier versions of this passage and <strong>the</strong> paragraph in which it<br />

appears. In <strong>the</strong> original essay (“A Degenerate’s View of Nordau” 359) it is simply <strong>the</strong><br />

“cardinal Rationalist error.” When it was revised and republished as The Sanity of<br />

Art in 1908 it became <strong>the</strong> “Rationalist-commercial error.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!