Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
50 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />
longings, and aspirations can be explained entirely in terms of a blind cacophony<br />
of indifferent forces and if <strong>the</strong>y are impotent to change <strong>the</strong> world<br />
in any way, <strong>the</strong>n my seeing and caring about <strong>the</strong> state of <strong>the</strong> world is functionally<br />
irrelevant. This is what <strong>the</strong> materialistic determinists maintain<br />
and what <strong>the</strong> vitalists, with Shaw in <strong>the</strong>ir vanguard, so intensely deny. Yet<br />
volition—if it is genuinely efficacious—is clearly not capricious. It follows<br />
that <strong>the</strong>re exists some kind of will-principle, that <strong>the</strong>re is a force in <strong>the</strong><br />
world, following its own rules, that is not blind or indifferent to <strong>the</strong> state of<br />
<strong>the</strong> universe. Shaw called it <strong>the</strong> Life Force.<br />
Shaw’s <strong>Religion</strong>: What It Is and Is Not<br />
Most studies of Shaw’s religious ideas stress its harmonies with traditional<br />
religion, but Shaw came to religion in a roundabout way, through science<br />
and rationalism. He insisted that religion must be both rational and practical.<br />
His belief in Creative Evolution required a leap of faith but one that<br />
sprang from a solid rational foundation. It was not a leap away from reason,<br />
not a defiance of logic and evidence, but a calculated leap into <strong>the</strong><br />
unknown under <strong>the</strong> guidance of good sense. <strong>Religion</strong> must respect facts<br />
and reason; “<strong>the</strong> law of God in any sense of <strong>the</strong> word which can now command<br />
a faith proof against science is a law of evolution” (Pref. Saint Joan<br />
6:57).<br />
Shaw sometimes spoke of religion as a means to an end, which could<br />
lead one to suspect <strong>the</strong> sincerity of his “religious” commitment. He felt<br />
that society desperately needs religion, declaring that he had become “a<br />
religious agitator because I have observed that men without religion have<br />
no courage” (Collected Letters 2:672). He elaborated on this observation in<br />
<strong>the</strong> preface to Back to Methuselah, where he implied that social progress is<br />
dependent on a positive religion. In 1948, looking back on <strong>the</strong> manifestations<br />
of moral and political chaos that erupted during <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong><br />
twentieth century, he declared that <strong>the</strong>y were “all <strong>the</strong> aberrations that can<br />
occur in <strong>the</strong> absence of a common faith and code of honor” (Preface, Miraculous<br />
Birth 18). But if he stressed <strong>the</strong> social need for a religion, his<br />
insistence on a faith that could be subscribed to by intelligent, thoughtful,<br />
and skeptical people, toge<strong>the</strong>r with his persistent devotion to religious issues,<br />
make it impossible to believe that he was not sincere.<br />
Shaw’s religion was no opiate; it was a call to realism and responsibility.<br />
When he declared that <strong>the</strong> Holy Ghost was <strong>the</strong> “sole survivor” of <strong>the</strong>