Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
168 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />
malign de facto center of power in The Apple Cart. Because its profits depend<br />
on breakdowns, accidents, and waste, it effectively suppresses all inventions<br />
and innovations that would create greater efficiency or make durable<br />
goods truly durable (6:328–29).<br />
Artificial inequality even distorts <strong>the</strong> market forces of supply and<br />
demand idolized by capitalist <strong>the</strong>orists. Because what is called “effective<br />
demand” depends on having money to offer, starvation does not create<br />
“demand” if those starving have no money, while idle people with more<br />
money than <strong>the</strong>y need to satisfy <strong>the</strong>ir genuine needs begin to lust after<br />
luxuries: useless toys that society calls “status symbols.” The economy is<br />
diverted from <strong>the</strong> production of genuine wealth and devotes itself to producing<br />
what Shaw called “illth.” “Exchange value itself, in fact, has become<br />
bedevilled like everything else, and represents no longer utility, but <strong>the</strong><br />
cravings of lust, folly, vanity, gluttony, and madness, technically described<br />
by genteel economists as ‘effective demand’” (“Economic Basis” 21).<br />
Money, Idolatry, and Civilization<br />
The artificial inequality produced by unequal distribution of society’s<br />
goods has a purpose:<br />
There is a solid reason for such inequalities in all societies which, like<br />
our own, are based on Idolatry. It is absolutely necessary, if you are to<br />
have an ordered society at all, that Bill Jones, who may possibly be a<br />
more muscular man than Jack Smith, should never<strong>the</strong>less obey Jack<br />
Smith even when he has not <strong>the</strong> least notion of what Jack Smith is<br />
driving at. To induce him to do it, you must somehow contrive to<br />
make him idolize Jack Smith. . . . If that is to be done, you must put a<br />
crown or a tiara on Jack’s head; prevent him from ever doing—or at<br />
least letting anyone see him doing—anything that Bill does; give him<br />
much more money and quite different clo<strong>the</strong>s, besides lodging him in<br />
a much finer house and surrounding him with minor idols to set <strong>the</strong><br />
example of worshipping him. (“Simple Truth” 161–62)<br />
It would appear that inequality, despite its terrible attendant evils, is necessary<br />
“if you are to have an ordered society at all,” but it makes sense only<br />
if <strong>the</strong> idolized actually do <strong>the</strong> superior work: if <strong>the</strong> governing class actually<br />
governs and does not just live in idle uselessness. The difficulty is that <strong>the</strong><br />
system is artificial and cannot guarantee that <strong>the</strong> most competent will<br />
have <strong>the</strong> reins of power. The idolatrous awe of money obscures true distinction,<br />
but <strong>the</strong> competent have a power apart from that conferred by