28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

168 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />

malign de facto center of power in The Apple Cart. Because its profits depend<br />

on breakdowns, accidents, and waste, it effectively suppresses all inventions<br />

and innovations that would create greater efficiency or make durable<br />

goods truly durable (6:328–29).<br />

Artificial inequality even distorts <strong>the</strong> market forces of supply and<br />

demand idolized by capitalist <strong>the</strong>orists. Because what is called “effective<br />

demand” depends on having money to offer, starvation does not create<br />

“demand” if those starving have no money, while idle people with more<br />

money than <strong>the</strong>y need to satisfy <strong>the</strong>ir genuine needs begin to lust after<br />

luxuries: useless toys that society calls “status symbols.” The economy is<br />

diverted from <strong>the</strong> production of genuine wealth and devotes itself to producing<br />

what Shaw called “illth.” “Exchange value itself, in fact, has become<br />

bedevilled like everything else, and represents no longer utility, but <strong>the</strong><br />

cravings of lust, folly, vanity, gluttony, and madness, technically described<br />

by genteel economists as ‘effective demand’” (“Economic Basis” 21).<br />

Money, Idolatry, and Civilization<br />

The artificial inequality produced by unequal distribution of society’s<br />

goods has a purpose:<br />

There is a solid reason for such inequalities in all societies which, like<br />

our own, are based on Idolatry. It is absolutely necessary, if you are to<br />

have an ordered society at all, that Bill Jones, who may possibly be a<br />

more muscular man than Jack Smith, should never<strong>the</strong>less obey Jack<br />

Smith even when he has not <strong>the</strong> least notion of what Jack Smith is<br />

driving at. To induce him to do it, you must somehow contrive to<br />

make him idolize Jack Smith. . . . If that is to be done, you must put a<br />

crown or a tiara on Jack’s head; prevent him from ever doing—or at<br />

least letting anyone see him doing—anything that Bill does; give him<br />

much more money and quite different clo<strong>the</strong>s, besides lodging him in<br />

a much finer house and surrounding him with minor idols to set <strong>the</strong><br />

example of worshipping him. (“Simple Truth” 161–62)<br />

It would appear that inequality, despite its terrible attendant evils, is necessary<br />

“if you are to have an ordered society at all,” but it makes sense only<br />

if <strong>the</strong> idolized actually do <strong>the</strong> superior work: if <strong>the</strong> governing class actually<br />

governs and does not just live in idle uselessness. The difficulty is that <strong>the</strong><br />

system is artificial and cannot guarantee that <strong>the</strong> most competent will<br />

have <strong>the</strong> reins of power. The idolatrous awe of money obscures true distinction,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> competent have a power apart from that conferred by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!