Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
136 <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong><br />
trous superstition <strong>the</strong> notion that certain coins are tainted by <strong>the</strong> hands<br />
through which <strong>the</strong>y have passed. He notes with approval <strong>the</strong> assertion of<br />
an actual officer of <strong>the</strong> Salvation Army that “<strong>the</strong>y would take money from<br />
<strong>the</strong> devil himself and be only too glad to get it out of his hands and into<br />
God’s” (Pref. 3:35). An understanding of how Barbara’s religion differs<br />
from that of <strong>the</strong> Salvation Army must begin at <strong>the</strong> most obvious and striking<br />
point of departure: <strong>the</strong> fact that Mrs. Baines accepts <strong>the</strong> money and<br />
Barbara does not. If <strong>the</strong> reason for Barbara’s rejection is an unwillingness<br />
to accept tainted money, <strong>the</strong>n Mrs. Baines is closer to Shaw’s own position<br />
than is Barbara. <strong>That</strong> is unlikely. It would also mean that Mrs. Baines, in<br />
her open-eyed pragmatism, is closer to Undershaft than is his daughter.<br />
But if Barbara is less enlightened than <strong>the</strong> Salvation Army—from <strong>the</strong> Undershaft<br />
point of view—it is difficult to see why he should think her so<br />
special.<br />
<strong>Religion</strong> and Responsibility<br />
Barbara’s disillusionment at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> second act illuminates <strong>the</strong> distinctive<br />
nature of her faith. It is special, for Barbara understands a fundamental<br />
truth missed by Mrs. Baines: <strong>the</strong> truth about <strong>the</strong> admonition to<br />
abstain from judgment. In <strong>the</strong> preface Shaw points out that “you can no<br />
more have forgiveness without vindictiveness than you can have a cure<br />
without a disease” (3: 43). The essence of vindictiveness is <strong>the</strong> concept that<br />
a misdeed is something to be repaid. Forgiveness is <strong>the</strong> cancellation of a<br />
debt, and sin (to use Barbara’s terminology) is not a debt. It cannot be<br />
erased; it can only be stopped. This, Shaw says, is a profound point of his<br />
disagreement with <strong>the</strong> Salvation Army, and Barbara is on his side, not <strong>the</strong><br />
Army’s. Barbara demonstrates <strong>the</strong> practical wisdom of <strong>the</strong> Sermon on <strong>the</strong><br />
Mount in fighting brutality and cruelty. She treats Bill Walker as an equal,<br />
a fellow sinner and child of God. She talks about his assaults on Jenny and<br />
Rummy as casually as she might his clothing or his trade: she actually<br />
suggests it is his trade. She does not bully, threaten, or condemn him. In<br />
fact, she does nothing to save his soul, as that is generally understood. She<br />
merely encourages Bill’s soul to save him. Rummy’s violent vindictiveness<br />
justifies his brutality, and so, in a real sense, he is comfortable with her.<br />
Toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y inhabit a world in which anger begets anger and violence<br />
excuses more violence. When Barbara tells Bill that he cannot buy his salvation,<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r in coin or in kind, what she really means is that she will not<br />
let him buy off his soul, she will not permit him to bribe his conscience.