progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r example is spectrum, frequency spectrum used for wireless. There are two ways<br />
to go. One is a Coasian way of creating real time bidding for <strong>the</strong> spectrum by users which<br />
can now be accomplished electronically. The o<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> classic way in which <strong>the</strong> FCC<br />
auctions off spectrum. It can be shown that <strong>the</strong> auction results in inefficient use of<br />
spectrum <strong>and</strong> adds <strong>the</strong> burden of Government control <strong>and</strong> regulatory delay. What is <strong>the</strong><br />
best way to proceed? Let us examine Coase.<br />
5.2.1 Coase's Theorem<br />
We begin with a simple overview of Coase's Theorem. Coase's famous observation is<br />
stated in <strong>the</strong> Library of Economics <strong>and</strong> Liberty is 117 :<br />
"Firms are like centrally planned economies, he wrote, but unlike <strong>the</strong> latter <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
formed because of people’s voluntary choices. But why do people make <strong>the</strong>se choices?<br />
The answer, wrote Coase, is “marketing costs.”… But because markets are costly to use,<br />
<strong>the</strong> most efficient production process often takes place in a firm. His explanation of why<br />
firms exist is now <strong>the</strong> accepted one <strong>and</strong> has given rise to a whole literature on <strong>the</strong> issue."<br />
The article continues:<br />
"Economists before Coase of virtually all political persuasions had accepted British<br />
economist Arthur Pigou's idea that if, say, a cattle ranchers cows destroy his neighboring<br />
farmer’s crops, <strong>the</strong> government should stop <strong>the</strong> rancher from letting his cattle roam free<br />
or should at least tax him for doing so. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, believed economists, <strong>the</strong> cattle would<br />
continue to destroy crops because <strong>the</strong> rancher would have no incentive to stop <strong>the</strong>m..."<br />
As I have argued before <strong>the</strong> Pigou school is one of central Government control via<br />
taxation. A favorite approach by Mankiw <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Harvard economists. If you don't like it<br />
tax it. In contrast Coase recognizes <strong>the</strong> efficiency of <strong>the</strong> market, if left to its own merits<br />
<strong>and</strong> that is saying something for a man who was an ardent Socialist when he began his<br />
analysis.<br />
The article concludes:<br />
"This insight was stunning. It meant that <strong>the</strong> case for government intervention was<br />
weaker than economists had thought…"<br />
Now on point as regards to health care Coase talks of <strong>the</strong> light house <strong>and</strong> how <strong>the</strong>y<br />
functioned without Government control. Specifically:<br />
"Coase also upset <strong>the</strong> apple cart in <strong>the</strong> realm of <strong>public</strong> goods. Economists often give <strong>the</strong><br />
lighthouse as an example of a <strong>public</strong> good that only government can provide. They<br />
choose this example not based on any information <strong>the</strong>y have about lighthouses, but ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
on <strong>the</strong>ir a priori view that lighthouses could not be privately owned <strong>and</strong> operated at a<br />
117 Buchanan, James M. <strong>and</strong> George F. Thirlby, http://www.econlib.org/library/NPDBooks/Thirlby/bcthLS5.html<br />
Page 109