04.04.2013 Views

progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group

progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group

progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />

PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />

INTELLECTUAL<br />

McGarry denies <strong>the</strong> nationalism which was part of Irel<strong>and</strong>, denies that it ever existed<br />

until <strong>the</strong> 19th century when <strong>the</strong> nationalists, by definition those seeking separatism, were<br />

brought to <strong>the</strong> fore. McGarry in good nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irish form beknghts <strong>the</strong> good English<br />

caretakers <strong>and</strong> implies that <strong>the</strong> struggle was at worst a religious struggle, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

nationalism did not arise until much later.<br />

I would strongly disagree for Irel<strong>and</strong> was a nation as early as <strong>the</strong> late sixth century. The<br />

writing of Columbanus to Gregory I clearly demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> Irish saw <strong>the</strong>mselves as<br />

a cohesive group, separate from <strong>the</strong> Gauls <strong>and</strong> Merovingians <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Angles <strong>and</strong> Saxons.<br />

It was in fact <strong>the</strong> choice that Gregory made in sending Augustine as Bishop of<br />

Canterbury in 598 that started <strong>the</strong> split between Irel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Britain. Gregory was battling<br />

with Columbanus since Columbanus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Irish hierarchy has favored Greek church<br />

rules <strong>and</strong> regulations <strong>and</strong> Gregory was commencing <strong>the</strong> separation of <strong>the</strong> Bishop of<br />

Rome from Byzantium, he was not yet a Pope, still just <strong>the</strong> Bishop of Rome.<br />

Thus one can argue that a true Irish nationalism was in place in 600 AD. What basis can<br />

one use for that statement, I will use Stalin's words from his study on nationalism, a study<br />

which he subsequently put into action when he established <strong>the</strong> USSR.<br />

As Joseph Stalin wrote 217 :<br />

"What is a nation? A nation is primarily a community, a definite community or<br />

people…Thus a nation is not a racial or tribal, but a historically constituted community<br />

or people…a common language is one of <strong>the</strong> characteristic features of a nation…a<br />

common territory is one of <strong>the</strong> characteristic features of a nation…a common economic<br />

life, economic cohesion, is one of <strong>the</strong> characteristic features of a nation…a common<br />

psychological makeup which manifests itself in a common culture is one of <strong>the</strong><br />

characteristic features of a nation…a nation is a historically constituted community of<br />

people formed on <strong>the</strong> basis of a common language territory economic life <strong>and</strong><br />

psychological makeup manifested in a common culture."<br />

This Irel<strong>and</strong> satisfied all of Stalin's dem<strong>and</strong>s as of 600, a common language, actually two,<br />

Irish <strong>and</strong> Latin, used intermingled, common l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Isl<strong>and</strong>, common psychological<br />

makeup, common economic life. Thus one can argue Irel<strong>and</strong> was indeed a nation.<br />

But to <strong>the</strong> present, <strong>the</strong> US is one nation, we struggled through <strong>the</strong> darkest hours defining<br />

that during <strong>the</strong> Civil War.<br />

Yet we are again facing a similar struggle, one where we on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong> have <strong>the</strong><br />

political divergence between progressives <strong>and</strong> constitutionalists, those who believe we<br />

can change anything we want whenever we so desire if it is in <strong>the</strong> best interests of <strong>the</strong><br />

"people" versus <strong>the</strong> group who believes <strong>the</strong>re is something sacred in <strong>the</strong> documents <strong>and</strong><br />

philosophy upon which <strong>the</strong> country was founded. Secondly we have <strong>the</strong> change which<br />

could occur as we introduce new immigrants who may not have accepted <strong>the</strong> "rules" of<br />

217 Petitto, … p .<br />

Page 212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!