progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
Boisvert tells <strong>the</strong> tale of <strong>the</strong> ship <strong>the</strong> Arbella which brought Winthrop <strong>and</strong> his followers to<br />
New Engl<strong>and</strong>. His sermon to <strong>the</strong> passengers when <strong>the</strong>y arrived is described by Boisvert<br />
as follows:<br />
"The dominant images he employed were those of "fabric knit toge<strong>the</strong>r" <strong>and</strong><br />
"bro<strong>the</strong>rhood". Notably absent from his discourse were two <strong>the</strong>mes which have come to<br />
dominate <strong>the</strong> subsequent political life of <strong>the</strong> country, freedom <strong>and</strong> equality." 85<br />
Boisvert speaks of Winthrop focusing on <strong>the</strong> inequality <strong>and</strong> diversity of <strong>the</strong> people <strong>and</strong><br />
thus <strong>the</strong>ir need to bon toge<strong>the</strong>r as a "society". He was stating that every man needed each<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
The validity of this is true in any society since <strong>the</strong>re is a need to have commence of many<br />
forms <strong>and</strong> this b<strong>and</strong>ing means that one person can interact in a civil manner with ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
However one should consider <strong>the</strong> option where a person whats to be left alone, left as an<br />
individual, <strong>and</strong> is that right permitted. One would argue that under <strong>the</strong> US Constitution it<br />
is, <strong>and</strong> again I reach back to Br<strong>and</strong>eis.<br />
Boisvert <strong>the</strong>n goes on to compare Locke to Winthrop, <strong>the</strong> group versus <strong>the</strong> individual. 86<br />
He contrasted <strong>the</strong> Winthrop community of unequals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need to b<strong>and</strong> toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Locke set of equal individuals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> emphasis on <strong>the</strong> sanctity of property <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
preservation of individual rights. Boisvert summarizes:<br />
"…<strong>the</strong> fruits of Dewey's reflections can be summarized as follows. The gap that separates<br />
Winthrop from Locke need not be as deep as it at first appears. Empirical naturalism<br />
offers a network of ideas within which <strong>the</strong> democratic aspirations of Locke can be<br />
coordinated with <strong>the</strong> concrete communal ideals of Winthrop. Dewey's rethinking of<br />
political <strong>the</strong>ory…involves a fundamental retranslation of political terminology.<br />
"Democracy", "individual", "freedom", "equality", <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> "<strong>public</strong>" take on new<br />
significance…" 87<br />
Thus Dewey redefines <strong>the</strong> terms we had built a country upon so that <strong>the</strong>y fit his societal<br />
<strong>and</strong> Progressive vision. This is a classic case of propag<strong>and</strong>a manipulation <strong>and</strong> having <strong>the</strong><br />
new platform of <strong>public</strong> intellectual it allows him to spread this rapidly to o<strong>the</strong>rs in his<br />
clan.<br />
Boisvert <strong>the</strong>n continues with <strong>the</strong> following quote from Dewey 88 :<br />
85 Boisvert p. 49.<br />
86 Boisvert pp 50-51.<br />
87 Boisvert p. 51.<br />
88 Boisvert pp 68-69.<br />
Page 79