04.04.2013 Views

progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group

progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group

progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />

PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />

INTELLECTUAL<br />

""I believe that … <strong>the</strong> teacher is not in <strong>the</strong> school to impose certain ideas or to form<br />

certain habits in <strong>the</strong> child, but is <strong>the</strong>re as a member of a community to select <strong>the</strong><br />

influences which shall affect <strong>the</strong> child <strong>and</strong> assist him in properly responding to <strong>the</strong>se<br />

influences.<br />

I believe that education is a regulation of <strong>the</strong> process of coming to share in <strong>the</strong> social<br />

consciousness <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> adjustment of individual activity on <strong>the</strong> basis of this social<br />

consciousness is <strong>the</strong> only sure method of social reconstruction." 78<br />

In a sense Dewey sees education as a process where we mold <strong>and</strong> control <strong>the</strong> individual,<br />

driving from <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>ir very individuality <strong>and</strong> seeking to attain a oneness with this<br />

"society" which Dewey has abstracted.<br />

This point is fur<strong>the</strong>r driven home by Fott:<br />

"Throughout his career Dewey insists, particularly in his works on education, that <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

no conflict between <strong>the</strong> good of a fully developed individual <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> good of society. The<br />

child naturally wants "to serve" his fellows in society, <strong>and</strong> educators must underst<strong>and</strong> that<br />

<strong>the</strong> "law" in intellectual <strong>and</strong> spiritual affairs is "co-operation <strong>and</strong> participation". "What<br />

one is as a person is what one is as associated with o<strong>the</strong>rs, in a free give <strong>and</strong> take of<br />

intercourse." That <strong>the</strong> activities of life are bound up with emotions appears to indicate<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re is no separate inner world for an individual apart from his relations with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs." 79<br />

This is a chilling observation <strong>and</strong> it is true. Dewey saw himself <strong>and</strong> his camp followers as<br />

puppet masters, those who held <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>and</strong> those who held <strong>the</strong> strings to make society,<br />

not individuals, do what <strong>the</strong>y felt was <strong>the</strong> correct thing to do. For Dewey <strong>the</strong> individual,<br />

as embodied in his view of <strong>the</strong> student <strong>and</strong> education, was a singular <strong>and</strong> immeasurable<br />

entity whose very existence depended solely upon belong <strong>and</strong> contributing to society.<br />

As Martin states:<br />

"…Dewey insisted that education be society-centered, for children are destined to<br />

become not isolated individuals but members <strong>and</strong> citizens of society. He saw <strong>and</strong> stated<br />

clearly that children's inner nature <strong>and</strong> mind grows from within but must be completed<br />

through relationships." 80<br />

Fott states:<br />

78 See Pestritto <strong>and</strong> Atto p 14.<br />

79 See Fott p 36.<br />

80 Martin p. 199.<br />

Page 76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!