progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
""I believe that … <strong>the</strong> teacher is not in <strong>the</strong> school to impose certain ideas or to form<br />
certain habits in <strong>the</strong> child, but is <strong>the</strong>re as a member of a community to select <strong>the</strong><br />
influences which shall affect <strong>the</strong> child <strong>and</strong> assist him in properly responding to <strong>the</strong>se<br />
influences.<br />
I believe that education is a regulation of <strong>the</strong> process of coming to share in <strong>the</strong> social<br />
consciousness <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> adjustment of individual activity on <strong>the</strong> basis of this social<br />
consciousness is <strong>the</strong> only sure method of social reconstruction." 78<br />
In a sense Dewey sees education as a process where we mold <strong>and</strong> control <strong>the</strong> individual,<br />
driving from <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>ir very individuality <strong>and</strong> seeking to attain a oneness with this<br />
"society" which Dewey has abstracted.<br />
This point is fur<strong>the</strong>r driven home by Fott:<br />
"Throughout his career Dewey insists, particularly in his works on education, that <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
no conflict between <strong>the</strong> good of a fully developed individual <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> good of society. The<br />
child naturally wants "to serve" his fellows in society, <strong>and</strong> educators must underst<strong>and</strong> that<br />
<strong>the</strong> "law" in intellectual <strong>and</strong> spiritual affairs is "co-operation <strong>and</strong> participation". "What<br />
one is as a person is what one is as associated with o<strong>the</strong>rs, in a free give <strong>and</strong> take of<br />
intercourse." That <strong>the</strong> activities of life are bound up with emotions appears to indicate<br />
that <strong>the</strong>re is no separate inner world for an individual apart from his relations with<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs." 79<br />
This is a chilling observation <strong>and</strong> it is true. Dewey saw himself <strong>and</strong> his camp followers as<br />
puppet masters, those who held <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>and</strong> those who held <strong>the</strong> strings to make society,<br />
not individuals, do what <strong>the</strong>y felt was <strong>the</strong> correct thing to do. For Dewey <strong>the</strong> individual,<br />
as embodied in his view of <strong>the</strong> student <strong>and</strong> education, was a singular <strong>and</strong> immeasurable<br />
entity whose very existence depended solely upon belong <strong>and</strong> contributing to society.<br />
As Martin states:<br />
"…Dewey insisted that education be society-centered, for children are destined to<br />
become not isolated individuals but members <strong>and</strong> citizens of society. He saw <strong>and</strong> stated<br />
clearly that children's inner nature <strong>and</strong> mind grows from within but must be completed<br />
through relationships." 80<br />
Fott states:<br />
78 See Pestritto <strong>and</strong> Atto p 14.<br />
79 See Fott p 36.<br />
80 Martin p. 199.<br />
Page 76