progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
always underscored—was a crucial flaw in <strong>the</strong>ir analysis of capitalism. The prior<br />
possession of money makes it easier to become an entrepreneur, of course, <strong>and</strong> successful<br />
ones do usually become wealthy.<br />
But <strong>the</strong> historical record shows unmistakably that, in <strong>the</strong> countries Schumpeter is<br />
discussing, entrepreneurs come from all income groups. (He had a deep interest in social<br />
classes, a topic he often wrote about.) “Risk bearing is no part of <strong>the</strong> entrepreneurial<br />
function. It is <strong>the</strong> capitalist who bears <strong>the</strong> risk. The entrepreneur does so only to <strong>the</strong><br />
extent to which . . . he is also capitalist, but qua entrepreneur he loses o<strong>the</strong>r people’s<br />
money.”<br />
Having staked out <strong>the</strong> distinctive role of <strong>the</strong> Entrepreneur, Schumpeter identifies<br />
entrepreneurial Profit as <strong>the</strong> prime motivator—“<strong>the</strong> premium put upon successful<br />
innovation.” When o<strong>the</strong>r participants in <strong>the</strong> same industry see <strong>the</strong> new level of Profit,<br />
<strong>the</strong>y try to duplicate <strong>the</strong> Innovation. In turn, <strong>the</strong> Entrepreneur tries to preserve his high<br />
Profit for as long as possible—through fur<strong>the</strong>r innovation, <strong>the</strong> use of patents, secret<br />
processes, advertising, <strong>and</strong> “aggression directed against actual <strong>and</strong> would-be<br />
competitors.”<br />
Schumpeter recognize <strong>the</strong> entrepreneur as <strong>the</strong> key element of capitalism, <strong>and</strong> suppression<br />
of that function would doom capitalism in <strong>the</strong> long run. What Schumpeter got wrong is<br />
that <strong>the</strong> entrepreneur in today's market must initially come to <strong>the</strong> table with <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> seed capital through <strong>the</strong>ir own resources. The venture capitalist did not exist at <strong>the</strong><br />
time Schumpeter wrote this <strong>and</strong> thus he is looking at <strong>the</strong> early 20th century view of<br />
financing entity <strong>and</strong> entrepreneur. The 21st century view is more complex <strong>and</strong> more<br />
reliant on <strong>the</strong> entrepreneur. Yet if <strong>the</strong> Government takes actions to suppress any of <strong>the</strong><br />
functions in <strong>the</strong> food chain of <strong>the</strong> entrepreneur it will kill it off <strong>and</strong> thus all innovation.<br />
McCraw details that well.<br />
These are forms of what, three years later, Schumpeter famously called “creative<br />
destruction” in Capitalism, Socialism <strong>and</strong> Democracy."<br />
Schumpeter was in many ways similar to Hayek. He introduced <strong>the</strong> concept of Creative<br />
Destruction, <strong>the</strong> process where businesses have natural lifetimes <strong>and</strong> are replaced by <strong>the</strong><br />
next best thing. He states 143 :<br />
"The opening of new markets, foreign or domestic, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> organizational development<br />
from <strong>the</strong> craft shop <strong>and</strong> factory to such concerns as U.S. Steel illustrate <strong>the</strong> same process<br />
of industrial mutation - if I may use that biological term - that incessantly revolutionizes<br />
<strong>the</strong> economic structures from within, incessantly destroying <strong>the</strong> old one, incessantly<br />
creating a new one. This process of Creative Destruction is <strong>the</strong> essential fact about<br />
capitalism."<br />
143 Schumpeter, Capitalism, p 83.<br />
Page 132