progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
4 PROGRESSIVES<br />
The classic Progressives were an outgrowth of <strong>the</strong> late 19th century. The reflected <strong>the</strong><br />
response of some to <strong>the</strong> growth in immigration, <strong>the</strong> changes in industrialism, <strong>the</strong> impact<br />
on <strong>the</strong> classic agricultural paradigm, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> growth of American cities. All of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
elements presented what was perceived as a threat to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n classic American life style.<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> most significant drivers of Progressivism was from <strong>the</strong> Mid Western<br />
Churches, primarily Protestant, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> Social Gospel movement<br />
which in many ways created <strong>the</strong> concept of "society" <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for helping all in <strong>the</strong><br />
family of this "society" <strong>and</strong> yet moving that role from <strong>the</strong> local church <strong>and</strong> community to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Government. This would be one of <strong>the</strong> first times that <strong>the</strong>re was a significant move to<br />
have <strong>the</strong> Government solve societal problems on a large scale.<br />
As presented by Halpin <strong>and</strong> Williams from <strong>the</strong> Center for American Progress 51 :<br />
The original Progressive Era is known primarily for two major developments in<br />
American politics:<br />
One, political reforms crafted to break up <strong>the</strong> power of privileged interests, such as<br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed suffrage, direct primaries, direct election of senators, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> initiative <strong>and</strong><br />
referendum process<br />
Two, economic reforms structured to counterbalance <strong>the</strong> excessive power of business <strong>and</strong><br />
to fight inequality measures such as <strong>the</strong> graduated income <strong>and</strong> inheritance taxes, <strong>the</strong><br />
right to organize <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r labor protections, unemployment insurance, worker’s<br />
compensation, old age <strong>and</strong> disability provisions, food <strong>and</strong> drug safety laws, <strong>and</strong><br />
conservation measures<br />
As a philosophical tradition, <strong>progressivism</strong> in its most complete form developed as a<br />
“new liberalism” for a new century—updating <strong>the</strong> American liberal tradition from its<br />
Jeffersonian, small-government, re<strong>public</strong>an roots best suited for <strong>the</strong> agrarian economy of<br />
<strong>the</strong> nation’s founding era to a more democratic <strong>and</strong> modern liberalism capable of<br />
checking rising corporate power. The original progressives argued that changes in <strong>the</strong><br />
economy’s organization required a more complete underst<strong>and</strong>ing of human freedom,<br />
equality, <strong>and</strong> opportunity that Jefferson championed so persuasively. Progressives<br />
believed that formal legal freedom alone—<strong>the</strong> negative protections against government<br />
intrusions on personal liberty—were not enough to provide <strong>the</strong> effective freedom<br />
necessary for citizens to fulfill <strong>the</strong>ir human potential in an age of rising inequality, paltry<br />
wages, <strong>and</strong> labor abuses. Changed conditions dem<strong>and</strong>ed a changed defense of human<br />
liberty.<br />
51 See The Progressive Intellectual Tradition in America April 2010 www.americanprogress.org<br />
Page 59