progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
dependent upon <strong>the</strong>ir quick co-operation, <strong>the</strong>ir ready response to <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>and</strong>s of<br />
instinct or intelligence, <strong>the</strong>ir amicable community of purpose. Government is not a<br />
body of blind forces; it is a body of men, with highly differentiated functions, no doubt,<br />
in our modern day, of specialization, with a common task <strong>and</strong> purpose.<br />
Their co-operation is indispensable, <strong>the</strong>ir warfare fatal. There can be no successful<br />
government without <strong>the</strong> intimate, instinctive co-ordination of <strong>the</strong> organs of life <strong>and</strong><br />
action. This is not <strong>the</strong>ory, but fact, <strong>and</strong> displays its force as fact, whatever <strong>the</strong>ories may<br />
be thrown across its track. Living political constitutions must be Darwinian in structure<br />
<strong>and</strong> in practice. Society is a living organism <strong>and</strong> must obey <strong>the</strong> laws of life, not of<br />
mechanics; it must develop.<br />
All that progressives ask or desire is permission—in an era when "development,"<br />
"evolution," is <strong>the</strong> scientific word—to interpret <strong>the</strong> Constitution according to <strong>the</strong><br />
Darwinian principle; all <strong>the</strong>y ask is recognition of <strong>the</strong> fact that a nation is a living<br />
thing <strong>and</strong> not a machine."<br />
The above statement by Wilson set that framework, specifically <strong>the</strong> call to action in <strong>the</strong><br />
last paragraph which states: in an era when "development," "evolution," is <strong>the</strong><br />
scientific word—to interpret <strong>the</strong> Constitution according to <strong>the</strong> Darwinian principle; all<br />
<strong>the</strong>y ask is recognition of <strong>the</strong> fact that a nation is a living thing <strong>and</strong> not a machine. The<br />
Constitution need not change <strong>the</strong> words just how <strong>the</strong> words are interpreted. The problem<br />
of course is twofold: first, who is <strong>the</strong> interpreter <strong>and</strong> second <strong>the</strong> Constitution had within it<br />
<strong>the</strong> means to change how it would be interpreted, <strong>and</strong> changed.<br />
Wilson <strong>the</strong>n goes on to address <strong>the</strong> opposition <strong>and</strong> his case <strong>the</strong> Re<strong>public</strong>ans. He starts out<br />
below by disemboweling Hamilton, without any doe process, just his belief that Hamilton<br />
was in favor of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>ed gentry. Then he goes on to Lincoln, giving Lincoln a<br />
backh<strong>and</strong>ed compliment <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n taking his shots at Re<strong>public</strong>ans. He states:<br />
"There are two <strong>the</strong>ories of government that have been contending with each o<strong>the</strong>r ever<br />
since government began. One of <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory which in America is associated with<br />
<strong>the</strong> name of a very great man, Alex<strong>and</strong>er Hamilton. A great man, but, in my judgment,<br />
not a great American. He did not think in terms of American life. Hamilton believed<br />
that <strong>the</strong> only people who could underst<strong>and</strong> government, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> only people<br />
who were qualified to conduct it, were <strong>the</strong> men who had <strong>the</strong> biggest financial stake in<br />
<strong>the</strong> commercial <strong>and</strong> industrial enterprises of <strong>the</strong> country.<br />
That <strong>the</strong>ory, though few have now <strong>the</strong> hardihood to profess it openly, has been <strong>the</strong><br />
working <strong>the</strong>ory upon which our government has lately been conducted. It is astonishing<br />
how persistent it is. It is amazing how quickly <strong>the</strong> political party which had Lincoln for its<br />
first leader,—Lincoln, who not only denied, but in his own person so completely<br />
disproved <strong>the</strong> aristocratic <strong>the</strong>ory,—it is amazing how quickly that party, founded on faith<br />
in <strong>the</strong> people, forgot <strong>the</strong> precepts of Lincoln <strong>and</strong> fell under <strong>the</strong> delusion that <strong>the</strong> "masses"<br />
needed <strong>the</strong> guardianship of "men of affairs.""<br />
Page 94