progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
Hobbes was somewhat of a strange Public Intellectual. A product of <strong>the</strong> 17th century,<br />
beset by <strong>the</strong> regicide <strong>and</strong> Cromwell, a supporter of <strong>the</strong> monarchy, <strong>and</strong> an apologist for <strong>the</strong><br />
King <strong>and</strong> his kingdom, Hobbes wrote Leviathan as a polemic to justify <strong>the</strong> reinstatement<br />
of <strong>the</strong> King <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> recognition that all <strong>the</strong> Kings subjects owed allegiance to <strong>the</strong> state. In<br />
a sense he was a quintessential progressive, with <strong>the</strong> King being <strong>the</strong> embodiment of <strong>the</strong><br />
state, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> King being <strong>the</strong> facilitator of <strong>the</strong> Progressive m<strong>and</strong>ates.<br />
4.1.1 Hobbes <strong>and</strong> Humanity<br />
Hobbes saw humanity as an unstable mass with <strong>the</strong> potential for explosive warfare <strong>and</strong><br />
unable to reach <strong>and</strong> consensus amongst <strong>the</strong>mselves without <strong>the</strong> strong h<strong>and</strong> of<br />
government 52 . To Hobbes, he saw this uncontrollable mass as <strong>the</strong> prime reason for<br />
establishing a government <strong>and</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r he saw <strong>the</strong> king <strong>and</strong> a strong central government as<br />
<strong>the</strong> only logical consequence.<br />
As Miller states as he discusses Hobbes 53 :<br />
"We need political authority, <strong>the</strong>n, because it gives us <strong>the</strong> security that allows us to trust<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r people, <strong>and</strong> in a climate of trust people are able to cooperate to produce all those<br />
benefits that Hobbes listed as signally lacking in <strong>the</strong> "natural condition"."<br />
Trust means predictable. Namely if A happens <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> consequence is B. For example if<br />
I enter into an agreement with someone <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y agree to B if I do A, <strong>and</strong> when upon<br />
completion of A <strong>the</strong>y fail to do B will <strong>the</strong> Government enforce that? Not necessarily. The<br />
Government may have its own ideas <strong>and</strong> thus <strong>the</strong> trust that Miller speaks of as <strong>the</strong> bond<br />
which is necessary to establish a government is missing. In fact it is infrequent that any<br />
one trust <strong>the</strong>ir government. As Hobbes had a low opinion of human nature <strong>the</strong><br />
individualists have a low, <strong>and</strong> often well deserved, opinion of <strong>the</strong> government.<br />
Thus we call Hobbes <strong>the</strong> proto progressive because of his distrust of people <strong>and</strong> his view<br />
that a strong government, with a king, was <strong>the</strong> only solution to an effective government.<br />
Hobbes was clear in that you could not trust <strong>the</strong> people to deal with <strong>the</strong>mselves, <strong>the</strong><br />
government was essential.<br />
As Miller quotes Hobbes as regards to Hobbes view of humanity 54 :<br />
"In such conditions, <strong>the</strong>re is no place for industry; because <strong>the</strong> fruit <strong>the</strong>reof is uncertain;<br />
<strong>and</strong> consequently no Culture of <strong>the</strong> Earth; no Navigation, nor use of <strong>the</strong> commodities that<br />
may be imported by sea; no commodious building, no instruments of moving <strong>and</strong><br />
removing such things as require much force, no Knowledge of <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> Earth, no<br />
52 Miller, Political Philosophy, p. 22.<br />
53 Miller, Political, p. 23.<br />
54 Miller, Hobbes, p./ 22.<br />
Page 61