progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
progressivism, individualism, and the public ... - Telmarc Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Telmarc</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
PROGRESSIVISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE PUBLIC<br />
INTELLECTUAL<br />
The concept of <strong>the</strong> pervasiveness of evolution for Spencer is detailed by <strong>the</strong> author where<br />
he states 43 :<br />
"A constant refrain in Spencer's early scientific writings was that all phenomenon of <strong>the</strong><br />
universe…were subject to evolution."<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r Francis states:<br />
"Spencer's initial conception of life was not a cold <strong>and</strong> objective; he saw life as <strong>the</strong><br />
general impulse towards goodness <strong>and</strong> perfection, evidenced everywhere one looked."<br />
This is a teleological outlook towards evolution, <strong>the</strong> goal being <strong>the</strong> goodness <strong>and</strong><br />
perfection as stated by Spencer. But was that indeed his view, <strong>and</strong> if so what drove this<br />
end point, since Spencer was not a truly religious man. Francis states that <strong>the</strong> intelligence<br />
was science in <strong>and</strong> of itself.<br />
Spencer was a prolific writer <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are a continuing set of streams of an evolving set<br />
of views. Yet Francis states that <strong>the</strong> paper "A <strong>the</strong>ory of Population" written in 1852 was<br />
<strong>the</strong> singular key to his early views. Francis argues for Spencer's views, views which<br />
aligned with <strong>the</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing presence of Great Britain. Francis states 44 :<br />
"…Spencer perceived his own experience <strong>and</strong> that of nature generally as "<strong>the</strong> inherent<br />
tendency of things going towards good…" He called this vis medicatrix naturae…<strong>the</strong><br />
progressive quality of nature even justified…suffering…necessary for benign<br />
progress…each conquered race or nation could acquire a liking for new modes of<br />
living…in <strong>the</strong> future Spencer saw new modes of evolution…(<strong>and</strong>) maintain a perfect <strong>and</strong><br />
long lived existence for each individual."<br />
In Chapter 15 Francis appears to get annoyed by <strong>the</strong> seminal work of Spencer, "The Man<br />
versus <strong>the</strong> State". He speaks of Spencer's anti-utilitarianism <strong>and</strong> his hostility towards<br />
Bentham like hedonism 45 . Francis states:<br />
"In "The Proper Sphere of Government" he (Spencer) wrote as a Christian utilitarian<br />
opposed to <strong>individualism</strong> <strong>and</strong> thus was hostile to those who construed happiness as if <strong>the</strong><br />
collective did not matter."<br />
Francis attacks "The Man versus <strong>the</strong> State" as being inconsistent with <strong>the</strong> true meaning of<br />
Spencer's views 46 . This is a w<strong>and</strong>ering <strong>and</strong> almost incoherent presentation in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>and</strong><br />
43 Francis p 193.<br />
44 Francis p 194.<br />
45 Francis pp 248-249.<br />
46 Francis p 249.<br />
Page 56