PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
48<br />
THE MARINE ALGÆ OF NEW ENGLAND.<br />
low-water mark. It can be distinguished from the preceding species by its lighter color, by being less<br />
rigid, and by the smaller size of the cells, which are rather uniformly as broad as long. If we may<br />
suspect that C. Picquotiana is only a form of C. melagonium, we may also suggest that the present is<br />
possibly the corresponding form of C. ærea. To unravel the synonymy of the species is quite hopeless.<br />
Our specimens agree with No. 353 of Crouan’s Algues Marines du Finistère and No. 183 of Areschoug’s<br />
Algæ Scandinavicæ, both of which are supposed to be the Conferva Linum. of the Flora Danica. They<br />
are also identical with No. 355 of Hohenacker’s Meeralgen, which purports to have been determined as<br />
C. herbacea, Kg., by Kützing himself. Whether they are the same as the Conferva Linum of the<br />
Phycologia Brittanica we cannot determine. They approach very near to, if they are not identical with,<br />
C. crassa of the Italian algologists. In fact, Crouan considers C. Linum, Pl. Dan., to be the same as C.<br />
crassa, Ag. The Chætomorpha sutoria of the Nereis Am. Bor. seems to us the same thing. We have<br />
examined Bailey’s specimens, from which Harvey named the species in the Nereis, and have also<br />
examined. Bailey’s locality, at Stonington. To the naked eye, in Bailey’s specimens, the filaments<br />
appear smaller than the typical form, but a microscopic examination gives the same measurements as<br />
specimens we collected ourselves, which agreed precisely with No. 353, Crouan. In saying that the New<br />
England specimens of C. sutoria should be considered to be rather C. Linum, we do not mean to imply<br />
that the European C. sutoria is not distinct. Whether our species is the same as Rhizoclonium Linum,<br />
Thuret, is, perhaps, doubtful. In specimens of the last-named species from Cherbourg the filaments<br />
appear to be somewhat smaller. The species usually, but not always, loses its color drying, and scarcely<br />
adheres to paper unless under considerable pressure.<br />
species inquirendæ.<br />
C. OLNEYI, Harv., Ner. Am. Bor., Part III, p. 86, Pl. 46 d.<br />
“Filaments tufted, setaceous, straight or curved, soft, pale green; articulations once<br />
and a half as long as broad.” (Harvey, l. c.)<br />
Rhode Island, Olney.<br />
C. LONGIARTICULATA, Harv., Ner. Am. Bor., Part III, p. 86, Pl. 46 e.<br />
“Filaments capillary, curved, loosely bundled together, flaccid, soft, pale green;<br />
articulations 4-6 times as long as broad, swollen at the nodes; var. β, crassior,<br />
filaments more robust.” (Harvey, 1. c.)<br />
In rock-pools, between tide-marks. Ship Anne Point, Mr. Hooper; Boston Bay, Mrs.<br />
Asa Gray; Little Compton, Mr. Olney; var. β in brackish ditches at Little Compton,<br />
Mr. Olney.<br />
The two last species are only known from the descriptions in the Nereis. No authentic specimens exist<br />
in the Olney Herbarium, which is now the property of Brown University. The specimen of C. Olneyi<br />
mentioned in Algæ Rhodiaceæ by Olney was determined by the present writer, not by Harvey himself,<br />
and a recent examination of the specimen, for which we are indebted to the kindness of Professor<br />
Bailey, lead us to think that the specimen was not correctly determined.<br />
RHIZOCLONIUM, Kütz.<br />
(From ριζον [rizon], a root, and κλων [klon], a branch.)<br />
Filaments decumbent, entangled, branches short and root-like.<br />
The genus is easily recognized, as a rule, by the root-like character of the branches. In some species the<br />
branches are frequent; in others, however, they are only occasionally