07.04.2013 Views

PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company

PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company

PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92<br />

THE MARINE ALGÆ OF NEW ENGLAND.<br />

LAMINARIA, Lamx.—Devil’s Aprons.<br />

(From lamina, a plate.)<br />

Fronds attached by a branching base,* stipitate, stipe expanding into a ribless entire<br />

or laciniate lamina; fruit forming bands or sori in the central part of the lamina,<br />

consisting of unicellular paraphyses and unilocular sporangia densely packed<br />

together; cryptostomata wanting.<br />

A genus comprising not far from twenty-five species, which inhabit principally seas in high latitudes.<br />

They all grow in pools at low-water mark and in deep water, and some attain a very large size. The<br />

limits of the genus are well fixed, but the same can by no means be said of the species, with regard to<br />

which writers differ very much. The difficulty arises partly from the fact that the species lose some of<br />

their characteristic marks in drying, so that the study of herbarium specimens is unsatisfactory, but<br />

still more from the fact that the species vary greatly in outline and habit according to the season and<br />

the place of growth, whether at an exposed or sheltered coast or whether submerged or partly exposed<br />

at low tide. In general, the species may be classed in two groups, those in which the frond is ribbon-like,<br />

that is, long in proportion to the breadth and not split up into segments, and those in which the frond is<br />

proportionately broader and fan-shaped and, except when young, laciniate. To the former group belongs<br />

the L. saccharina of older writers, to the latter L. digitata, and it is with regard to the extent to which<br />

subdivision shall be carried in the two cases mentioned that recent writers differ very widely. Our<br />

species have not been sufficiently studied in situ to warrant us in giving the determinations with any<br />

degree of confidence. More information with regard to their winter condition is very much needed. The<br />

most detailed account of the Laminariæ of the eastern coast is to be found in the paper of De la Pylaie<br />

in the Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Ser. 1, Vol. IV, 1824, entitled “Quelques observations sur les<br />

productions de File de Terre-Neuve, et sur quelques algues de la côte de France appartenant au genre<br />

Laminaire.” The article is accompanied by a plate in which is sufficiently well shown the habit of our<br />

common species. The same writer in 1829 gave a more extended account of his collections in the “Flore<br />

de Terre-Neuve et des lies Saint Pierre et Miclon,” an incomplete work comprehending the<br />

Laminariaceæ and Fucaceæ, of which, however, the plates were never published. The species of De la<br />

Pylaie have not been accepted without question by algologists, and all agree that he was too liberal in<br />

the formation of new species. Harvey ignores the greater part of them in the Nereis. Agardh and Le<br />

Jolis give them a more respectful consideration, and the former especially is inclined, in his paper on<br />

the Laminariaceæ and Fucaceæ of Greenland, to admit several of De la Pylaie’s species. In the present<br />

case we do not feel at liberty to make use of the notes with regard to American forms which have been<br />

kindly furnished by European correspondents, but must content ourselves with a superficial account of<br />

the perplexing forms of this exasperating genus, adding that the identity of our forms with those of<br />

Europe is not in all cases proved.<br />

Of the species of Laminaria given in the Nereis, L. fascia in now placed in Phyllitis; L. lorea and L.<br />

dermatodea refer to the same plant, which is now placed in Saccorhiza; L. longicruris is still kept as in<br />

the Nereis; L. saccharina and L. digitata are kept with limitations; and L. trilaminata is, as Harvey<br />

suspected, merely an abnormal winged form of some other species, corresponding to the trilaminate<br />

condition mentioned under Agarum Turneri.<br />

The marks used in distinguishing the species are the arrangment [sic] of the root-fibers; the structure<br />

of the stipe, whether solid or hollow, whether provided with distinct cavities containing mucus<br />

(muciparous glands) the shape of the lamina, more particularly<br />

*A few species, as L. solidungula, Ag., have a disk-like base, and L. sessilis, Ag., including L. apoda,<br />

Harv., found on our west coast, has no stipe properly speaking.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!