PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
92<br />
THE MARINE ALGÆ OF NEW ENGLAND.<br />
LAMINARIA, Lamx.—Devil’s Aprons.<br />
(From lamina, a plate.)<br />
Fronds attached by a branching base,* stipitate, stipe expanding into a ribless entire<br />
or laciniate lamina; fruit forming bands or sori in the central part of the lamina,<br />
consisting of unicellular paraphyses and unilocular sporangia densely packed<br />
together; cryptostomata wanting.<br />
A genus comprising not far from twenty-five species, which inhabit principally seas in high latitudes.<br />
They all grow in pools at low-water mark and in deep water, and some attain a very large size. The<br />
limits of the genus are well fixed, but the same can by no means be said of the species, with regard to<br />
which writers differ very much. The difficulty arises partly from the fact that the species lose some of<br />
their characteristic marks in drying, so that the study of herbarium specimens is unsatisfactory, but<br />
still more from the fact that the species vary greatly in outline and habit according to the season and<br />
the place of growth, whether at an exposed or sheltered coast or whether submerged or partly exposed<br />
at low tide. In general, the species may be classed in two groups, those in which the frond is ribbon-like,<br />
that is, long in proportion to the breadth and not split up into segments, and those in which the frond is<br />
proportionately broader and fan-shaped and, except when young, laciniate. To the former group belongs<br />
the L. saccharina of older writers, to the latter L. digitata, and it is with regard to the extent to which<br />
subdivision shall be carried in the two cases mentioned that recent writers differ very widely. Our<br />
species have not been sufficiently studied in situ to warrant us in giving the determinations with any<br />
degree of confidence. More information with regard to their winter condition is very much needed. The<br />
most detailed account of the Laminariæ of the eastern coast is to be found in the paper of De la Pylaie<br />
in the Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Ser. 1, Vol. IV, 1824, entitled “Quelques observations sur les<br />
productions de File de Terre-Neuve, et sur quelques algues de la côte de France appartenant au genre<br />
Laminaire.” The article is accompanied by a plate in which is sufficiently well shown the habit of our<br />
common species. The same writer in 1829 gave a more extended account of his collections in the “Flore<br />
de Terre-Neuve et des lies Saint Pierre et Miclon,” an incomplete work comprehending the<br />
Laminariaceæ and Fucaceæ, of which, however, the plates were never published. The species of De la<br />
Pylaie have not been accepted without question by algologists, and all agree that he was too liberal in<br />
the formation of new species. Harvey ignores the greater part of them in the Nereis. Agardh and Le<br />
Jolis give them a more respectful consideration, and the former especially is inclined, in his paper on<br />
the Laminariaceæ and Fucaceæ of Greenland, to admit several of De la Pylaie’s species. In the present<br />
case we do not feel at liberty to make use of the notes with regard to American forms which have been<br />
kindly furnished by European correspondents, but must content ourselves with a superficial account of<br />
the perplexing forms of this exasperating genus, adding that the identity of our forms with those of<br />
Europe is not in all cases proved.<br />
Of the species of Laminaria given in the Nereis, L. fascia in now placed in Phyllitis; L. lorea and L.<br />
dermatodea refer to the same plant, which is now placed in Saccorhiza; L. longicruris is still kept as in<br />
the Nereis; L. saccharina and L. digitata are kept with limitations; and L. trilaminata is, as Harvey<br />
suspected, merely an abnormal winged form of some other species, corresponding to the trilaminate<br />
condition mentioned under Agarum Turneri.<br />
The marks used in distinguishing the species are the arrangment [sic] of the root-fibers; the structure<br />
of the stipe, whether solid or hollow, whether provided with distinct cavities containing mucus<br />
(muciparous glands) the shape of the lamina, more particularly<br />
*A few species, as L. solidungula, Ag., have a disk-like base, and L. sessilis, Ag., including L. apoda,<br />
Harv., found on our west coast, has no stipe properly speaking.