PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
74<br />
THE MARINE ALGÆ OF NEW ENGLAND.<br />
judged from the figure, is the same as E. Farlowii. Although in the present instance we have considered<br />
E. Farlowii to be a variety of E. littoralis, it must be admitted that it differs considerably from the form<br />
of E. littoralis common on the coast of France and England. Our reason for not considering it distinct is<br />
that we have large sets of specimens in which we have been unable to say with certainty whether they<br />
should be referred to E. littoralis or E. Farlowii, and with so many connecting links it seems best to<br />
regard E. Farlowii as an extreme form found in northern localities. Should the variety be eventually<br />
considered distinct the name of E. anticostiensis should be adopted, as no description of E. Farlowii has<br />
been published, and the species would be characterized by the robustness of the filaments and by the<br />
unilocular sporangia, which are broader than long, and borne in short, stout, patent branches. It is of<br />
frequent occurrence that some of the unilocular sporangia are binate. The plurilocular sporangia are<br />
common in spring and early summer, and the unilocular in the autumn.<br />
E. BRACHIATUS, Harv.<br />
“Finely-tufted, feathery, much branched; the branches free, opposite or quarternate;<br />
ramuli opposite, very patent; propagula forming oblong or elliptical swellings in the<br />
smaller branches, or at the point where two opposite ramuli issue.” (Harv., Ner. Am.<br />
Bor., Vol. I, p. 138.)<br />
South Boston, Lynn, Mass., Harvey.<br />
We have never found this species, which is only known on our coast from Harvey’s description. Le Jolis<br />
considers that the E. brachiatus of the Phyc. Brit., Pl. 4, is not the true Conferva brachiata, Engl. Bot.,<br />
and he gives to the former the name of E. Griffithsianus. Never having seen American specimens, we<br />
cannot tell whether the American form mentioned by Harvey belongs to the E. Griffithsianus or not.<br />
SUBGENUS CAPSICARPELLA, Kjellman.<br />
Filaments erect, monosiphonous or in part polysiphonous; unilocular sporangia<br />
partly immersed in the frond; plurilocular sporangia formed by direct<br />
transformation of the cells of the branches.<br />
E. SPHÆROPHORUS, Harv., Phyc. Brit., Pl. 126. (Capsicarpella sphærophora,<br />
Kjellman, Bidrag, p. 20, Pl. 1, Fig. 2.)<br />
Filaments one to three inches long, tufted, densely branching; main branches<br />
opposite or whorled, often polysiphonous; secondary branches opposite or alternate,<br />
monosiphonous; unilocular sporangia spherical, about .04 mm in diameter, solitary,<br />
often binate, sometimes whorled, the cell from which the sporangia are formed<br />
dividing into at least three cells; plurilocular sporangia?<br />
On Ptilota elegans. May.<br />
Nahant, Mr. Collins; Europe.<br />
A rare species which has only been collected by Mr. Collins, The main filaments are at intervals<br />
polysiphonous, and remind one of a Sphacelaria. In Mr. Collins’s specimens the sporangia were<br />
numerous and in some cases whorled, as is occasionally seen in European specimens. The species is to<br />
be sought in spring and early summer, and may be commoner than is now supposed, having escaped<br />
the observation of collectors on account of its small size.