07.04.2013 Views

PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company

PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company

PDF file (text) - Cryptogamic Botany Company

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84<br />

THE MARINE ALGÆ OF NEW ENGLAND.<br />

Var. DENSA.<br />

Fronds six to eight inches long, main axis densely clothed with very numerous short<br />

branches.<br />

Common on stones near low-water mark along the whole coast.<br />

The var. densa at Gloucester, Mass., Mrs. Davis.<br />

A common species, recognized by its tough, somewhat elastic substance, and reminding one of bunches<br />

of small leather shoe-strings. When soaked in water it gives out a large amount of slime, and is not<br />

easily mounted. To the naked eye it resembles some of the forms of Dictyosiphon, but the microscopic<br />

structure is very different. The variety has been collected several times at Gloucester, but has not been<br />

received from other localities.<br />

MESOGLOIA, Ag.<br />

(From µεσος [mesos], the middle, and γλοιος [gloios], slimy.)<br />

Fronds olive-brown, gelatinous, filiform, branching; axial layer composed of<br />

filaments rather loosely united into a solid mass, which soon becomes fistulose;<br />

peripheral layer of short horizontal filaments, packed in a gelatinous substance;<br />

unilocular sporangia oval, borne at the base of peripheral filaments; plurilocular<br />

sporangia unknown.<br />

The old genus Mesogloia has been divided by modern algologists into a number of genera. In the<br />

present instance we have kept in Mesogloia the species in which the peripheral filaments are not<br />

transformed into plurilocular sporangia, and have placed in Castagnea the species in which they are so<br />

transformed. The distinction between Mesogloia and Castagnea is artificial, because the plurilocular<br />

sporangia of Mesogloia proper are unknown, and it is not impossible that they may be formed from the<br />

peripheral filaments themselves, as in Castagnea. The development of the fronds is not well known,<br />

and the genera founded upon the variations in the mature fronds in the present group are plainly<br />

artificial. As regards its development, M. divaricata resembles very closely C. virescens. From a disklike<br />

expansion, composed of a single layer of cells, which form spots on the substance upon which it is<br />

growing, arise vertical filaments, which end in a hair such as is found in Ectocarpus and other<br />

Phæosporeæ. The vertical filaments produce, usually only on one side, fasciculated branches terminated<br />

by a hair, beneath which is a cluster of short moniliform filaments. Besides these there arise, at a later<br />

period, rhizoidal filaments. The mature fronds of the two species above named may be regarded as a<br />

collection of filaments with a trichothallic growth, which have become twisted together and partially<br />

united by means of the rhizoidal filaments, and whose fasciculated branches constitute what, in the<br />

mature plant, seems to be a distinct cortical layer. In Castagnea virescens the separate filaments, with<br />

their lateral fasciculate branches, can easily be isolated by dissecting the smaller branches, and the<br />

same thing can also be accomplished with Chordaria divaricata, although not so easily. The species of<br />

Mesogloia and Castagnea should not be dried under too heavy pressure, and alcoholic specimens are<br />

much better for study than those mounted on paper.<br />

M. DIVARICATA, Kütz. (Chordaria divaricata, Ag.; Phyc. Brit., Pl. 17; Ner. Am. Bor.,<br />

Vol. I, Pl. 11 a.)<br />

Fronds tufted, lubricous, six inches to two feet long, branching very irregular,<br />

generally without a definite main axis; branches flexuous, ultimate branches very<br />

numerous, short, and divaricate, at first solid,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!