24.04.2013 Views

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BURIED JURASSIC OF THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES 569<br />

and in SW. Alabama (that is, towards the north-east) this rises diachronically<br />

and at the same time becomes thicker and coarser and contains<br />

pebbles derived from the Appalachian Mountains, which are consequently<br />

inferred to have experienced a revival of uplift at this time. 'It seems<br />

logical to correlate the uplift of these mountains with the Palisade disturbance,<br />

which formed block mountains from Nova Scotia to the Carolinas<br />

sometime after the Upper Triassic and before the Upper Cretaceous'<br />

(Imlay, 1943, p. 1474).<br />

According to Swain (1949, p. 1250) the movements between Upper<br />

Oxfordian and Lower Kimeridgian in the southern States were insignificant<br />

FIG. 90.—Generalized horizontal section through the Jurassic and Cretaceous of southern<br />

Arkansas and northern Louisiana, after Imlay. (From Journ. Paleont., 1941.)<br />

compared with later ones which occurred at or near the end of the<br />

Kimeridgian. In that case 'the most intense interval of uplift of Jurassic<br />

time' (Swain) coincided with the Nevadan orogeny.<br />

CUBA<br />

Excepting only Kiogar in the Himalayas with its 'erratic blocks of<br />

Malla Johar', no small Jurassic area in the world has proved so baffling<br />

to geologists or produced so many conflicting interpretations as the Organ<br />

Mountains in Pinar del Rio province in western Cuba. In the geological<br />

literature on this region published during the last 35 years it is standard<br />

practice for every account to contradict its predecessors on almost all<br />

important points. The same formations have been declared to be<br />

Palaeozoic, Jurassic, and LTpper Cretaceous, the Jurassic has been stated<br />

to be 120 m. thick in one account and 10,500 m. thick in another; the<br />

junction between the Upper Oxfordian and Tithonian has been interpreted<br />

as a major unconformity demonstrably due to an important Jurassic<br />

http://jurassic.ru/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!