24.04.2013 Views

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

u8 WESTERN GERMANY<br />

and Athleta Beds of Model. Spath (1949) showed that only Model's beds<br />

2-6 are Upper Callovian, with a total thickness of 3-1 m., and he attempted<br />

to distinguish Athleta and Lamberti Zones on the basis of Model's collection<br />

now in the British Museum. In some places in the Swabian Alb<br />

the Lamberti Zone is represented in the nodule bed, for typical Quenstedtoceras<br />

cf. lamberti, in preservation too perfect to be derived, are found<br />

in the nodules, whereas in other places similar nodules yield typical<br />

Cardioceras of the Cordatum Zone (Quenstedt, 1887, pi. 90, figs. 8, 10).<br />

MIDDLE AND LOWER CALLOVIAN (up to 45 m.)<br />

The maximum thickness of 45 m. is reached in the Lochen district<br />

(Fischer, 1913, p. 27) but it is usually much less. In Franconia about<br />

10 m. of Ornatenton underlain by a thin Macrocephalenbank is normal.<br />

For richness of faunas and beauty of preservation, this Middle and Lower<br />

Callovian may be unrivalled, but owing mainly to ambiguities of nomenclature<br />

and poverty of clear exposures it is difficult to obtain an accurate<br />

picture of the ammonite sequence. From the work of Reuter (1908,<br />

1910, 1927) the succession at least in Franconia seemed simple, but the<br />

more intensive work of Dorn (1916, 1922), Model (1914, 1916, 1935),<br />

Model & Kuhn (1935) and Kuhn (1935, 1939) revealed an unsuspected<br />

wealth of ammonites and complexity of distribution, and caused Model<br />

(in Model & Kuhn, 1935, p. 468) to repudiate the scheme of facieschanges<br />

worked out by Reuter (1908).<br />

It is impossible here to summarize or even comment usefully on Model's<br />

and Model & Kuhn's detailed and valuable records and discussions of the<br />

ammonites, even though large numbers have since been figured by Kuhn<br />

(1939). The basic difficulties in using these figures are, first, that most<br />

come from the famous Goldschnecken clays, in which only septate inner<br />

whorls are preserved, and, secondly, that few are figured in ventral view<br />

or with whorl-sections.<br />

Detailed correlation with England bristles with difficulties. For<br />

instance, Kosmoceras jason is recorded from as low as the Parapatoceras<br />

bed to as high as the obductum bed, and the specimen figured by Kuhn<br />

(1939, pi. i, fig. 8) is more like the nucleus of a gulielmi or stutchburii.<br />

Reineckeia anceps is recorded from immediately above the Parapatoceras<br />

bed, associated with Macrocephalites and Sigaloceras, a position substantially<br />

lower than would be expected if it is the same species as that in the<br />

main anceps level higher up. The 'calloviensis' of the Calloviensis-<br />

Enodatum Zone is according to Model & Kuhn (1935, p. 476) 'coarsely<br />

ribbed thick forms which seem to go back to Kepplerites keppleri', and<br />

therefore can hardly belong to Hyatt's genus Sigaloceras, while commonest<br />

in the upper Utzing beds is Catasigaloceras Buckman, which denotes a<br />

higher horizon (Planicerclus Subzone); and the two nuclei figured as<br />

S. calloviense by Kuhn (1939, pi. i, figs. 5, 7) appear to belong to Kepplerites<br />

(gowerianus group). Some records of S. calloviense probably refer to<br />

S. franconicum See (type K. cf. calloviensis Reuter, 1908, p. 99, fig.).<br />

http://jurassic.ru/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!