24.04.2013 Views

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

Arkell.1956.Jurassic..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

624 GENERAL SURVEY<br />

that of the present day; in fact the volcanic rocks, batholiths and foldstructures<br />

of the Pacific border of North America are largely of Jurassic<br />

origin, as appears in the next two chapters. Batholiths such as characterize<br />

the mobile belt in North America were not intruded in the Jurassic<br />

period in any other part of the world. Active volcanicity is found also in<br />

South America, in the Caucasus and Crimea, and on a smaller scale in<br />

the Mediterranean. Jurassic orogenies occurred in North America but<br />

not South America, and also in the Caucasus and Crimea.<br />

Over the rest of the mobile belts, down most of the east side of Asia<br />

(except NE. Siberia) and thence to New Zealand, the only feature distinguishing<br />

the Jurassic deposits from those on the labile shelves, besides<br />

occasional volcanicity, is the great thicknesses of sediment, and even that<br />

criterion fails in the Himalayas, in SE. Asia and over much of the. Mediterranean<br />

area. Geosynclines certainly existed in the Jurassic in NE.<br />

Siberia, where thicknesses of 4000 to 6000 m. are recorded, and (the<br />

Papuan geosyncline) from New Guinea, through New Caledonia to New<br />

Zealand, where the thickness of the Jurassic approaches 5000 m. Something<br />

like such thicknesses are reached in the Alps where, as Deecke (1912)<br />

showed, small deeps and shallows and emergent islands and mobile ridges<br />

existed side by side.<br />

In the Himalayas and Tibet the Jurassic system shows signs of mobility,<br />

such as disconformities, condensed formations and contrasting facies,<br />

but there is no indication of a geosyncline between Western Yunnan and<br />

the Pamirs. As has been pointed out before, the celebrated Spiti Shales<br />

are similar in facies to the English Upper Lias and Kimeridge Clay,<br />

but they are thinner, more heterogeneous, and indicative of less continuous<br />

subsidence than the Kimeridge Clay of Kimeridge. The Spiti Shales<br />

extend over an enormous area in Tibet (p. 413) without radical change of<br />

facies. The Callovian in the Spiti area and the Bajocian in Tibet (Lungma<br />

Limestone) are condensed and highly fossiliferous ironshot oolites, and in<br />

the exotic blocks of the Kiogars are samples of red Adnet Limestone of<br />

Hettangian and Sinemurian age and Upper Tithonian Calpionella oolite,<br />

both matching their counterparts in southern Europe. Except for 200-<br />

300 m. of possibly Lower Tithonian limestone (Kiogar Limestone), all<br />

the formations, though varied, are thin; and there are no conglomerates,<br />

unconformities, or Jurassic igneous rocks. The Jurassic features of this<br />

part of the greatest Tertiary mobile belt on earth, therefore, are those of a<br />

labile shelf. Here the Tethys was merely a shelf-sea comparable with that<br />

of north-western Europe.<br />

In the Mediterranean area outside the Alps (where acute tectonic<br />

deformation in the Tertiary orogenies makes reconstructions difficult<br />

and hazardous), North Africa (Barbary) provides the most detailed<br />

information over the largest area, thanks to the work of many French<br />

geologists in Algeria and Morocco, and especially to the brilliant analyses<br />

and syntheses of G. Lucas (1942, 1952). Barbary forms the southern part<br />

of the mobile belt of Tethys, adjoining the north margin of the African<br />

http://jurassic.ru/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!