Niger Delta Human Development Report - UNDP Nigeria - United ...
Niger Delta Human Development Report - UNDP Nigeria - United ...
Niger Delta Human Development Report - UNDP Nigeria - United ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2<br />
Analyses of poverty<br />
and human development<br />
paint a dismal<br />
picture, particularly<br />
when the delta is<br />
compared with other<br />
oil-producing regions<br />
of the world.<br />
Social instability,<br />
poor local governance,<br />
competition for<br />
economic resources<br />
and environmental<br />
degradation have<br />
taken a toll.<br />
The delta today is a<br />
place of frustrated<br />
expectations and<br />
deep-rooted mistrust.<br />
offer very limited economic opportunities.<br />
Infrastructure and social services are<br />
generally deplorable, and vastly inadequate<br />
for an estimated regional population of<br />
nearly 30 million people.<br />
While many development agencies and<br />
private sector organizations, including oil<br />
companies, have sought to transform the<br />
region socially and economically, analyses<br />
of poverty and human development paint<br />
a dismal picture. The region’s human<br />
development index (HDI) score, a<br />
measure of well-being encompassing the<br />
longevity of life, knowledge and a decent<br />
standard of living, remains at a low value<br />
of 0.564 (with 1 being the highest score).<br />
While these ratings put the <strong>Niger</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> at<br />
a slightly higher level than <strong>Niger</strong>ia’s overall<br />
HDI of 0.453, the area rates far below<br />
countries or regions with similar oil and<br />
gas resources. For example, the HDI for<br />
Saudi Arabia in 2000 stood at 0.800, while<br />
in 2003 the <strong>United</strong> Arab Emirates, Kuwait,<br />
Libya, Venezuela and Indonesia achieved<br />
scores of 0.849, 0.844, 0.799, 0.772 and<br />
0.697, respectively.<br />
A further disaggregation of the HDI score<br />
at the local government level in the <strong>Niger</strong><br />
<strong>Delta</strong> clearly shows that regional and state<br />
scores mask inequalities in human development<br />
among oil-producing communities.<br />
In spite of the efforts of oil companies to<br />
enhance the well-being of the communities<br />
where they operate through several development<br />
initiatives, particularly in social<br />
infrastructure, there is still wide disparity<br />
in the performances of local government<br />
areas. The report discovers that most of<br />
the best performing local government areas<br />
on the HDI are the urban ones, while<br />
the majority of the poorly performing<br />
ones are those based in rural areas. The<br />
local government areas without oil facilities<br />
appear to fare better on the poverty<br />
index than those with oil facilities; an indication<br />
of unequal distribution of oil revenues.<br />
The poor outcomes of development<br />
interventions of oil companies are,<br />
to some extent, due to lack of a systematic<br />
link to government development plans.<br />
The delta’s appalling human development<br />
situation cannot be completely captured<br />
by the HDI, as some essential issues in<br />
the region are not reflected in the computation<br />
of the index, such as the dire state<br />
of infrastructure. The lack of data also<br />
distorts the calculation of the index to<br />
some extent. Nevertheless, available data<br />
point to the fact that the region is not faring<br />
well. The poor marks suggest the delta<br />
may struggle to achieve the MDGs. It is<br />
only close in one area—school enrolments—and<br />
is not likely to meet the other<br />
goals by the target date of 2015 or anytime<br />
soon after.<br />
Behind the delta’s poor performance on<br />
human development is a complex brew<br />
of economic, social, political and environmental<br />
factors. Social instability, poor local<br />
governance, competition for economic<br />
resources and environmental degradation<br />
have taken a toll. The general neglect of<br />
infrastructure, often rationalized by the<br />
difficulty of the delta’s terrain, has worsened<br />
people’s access to fundamental services<br />
such as electricity, safe drinking water,<br />
roads and health facilities that are<br />
taken for granted in many other parts of<br />
<strong>Niger</strong>ia. Other elements include the negative<br />
impacts of the oil industry, a constricted<br />
land area, a delicately balanced environment<br />
and extreme economic deprivation.<br />
The delta today is a place of frustrated<br />
expectations and deep-rooted mistrust.<br />
Unprecedented restiveness at times erupts<br />
in violence. Long years of neglect and<br />
conflict have fostered a siege mentality,<br />
especially among youths who feel they are<br />
condemned to a future without hope, and<br />
see conflict as a strategy to escape<br />
deprivation. Persistent conflict, while in<br />
part a response to poor human<br />
development, has also entrenched it,<br />
serving as a consistent drag on the region’s<br />
economic performance and expectations<br />
for advancement.<br />
The sabotage of oil production hurts the<br />
economy through the loss of sorely<br />
needed foreign exchange to finance<br />
national development. Blown pipelines<br />
interrupt the supply of crude to refineries<br />
and produce shortages that cause sudden<br />
spikes in oil prices. Hostage-taking is not<br />
only a stress on foreign captives, their<br />
families and the companies they work for,<br />
NIGER DELTA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT