29.04.2013 Views

AGENDA - Shire of Roebourne

AGENDA - Shire of Roebourne

AGENDA - Shire of Roebourne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ordinary Council Meeting – Agenda 19 October 2009<br />

On behalf <strong>of</strong> Landcorp, the Burgess Design Group approached the Department <strong>of</strong> Planning<br />

Pilbara planning <strong>of</strong>ficers both in Karratha and Perth seeking support in principle to the<br />

altered lot configuration. Advice was received that the change is considered minor in nature<br />

and that the DP would not require an amendment.<br />

Issues<br />

Requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roebourne</strong> Town Planning Scheme No. 8<br />

Clause 6.4.5 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Shire</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roebourne</strong> Town Planning Scheme No. 8 [the Scheme] states:<br />

Any departure from or alterations to the Development Plan may, subject to the approval <strong>of</strong><br />

the Commission, be permitted if the Council considers that the proposed departure or<br />

alteration will not prejudice the progressive subdivision and development <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

Contrary to advice given by the Department <strong>of</strong> Planning, should Council support the<br />

proposed change to the configuration <strong>of</strong> lots, an amendment to the DP is required to be<br />

endorsed and forwarded to the WAPC for adoption.<br />

Clause 6.4.4 <strong>of</strong> the Scheme states that the Council may require the advertising <strong>of</strong><br />

development plans, including amendments to endorsed plans. Due to the minor nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed development plan amendment and in the interest <strong>of</strong> expediting the<br />

subdivision approval and subsequent land release, it is not considered necessary for the<br />

plan to be publically advertised<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the Development Plan with Regard to Statutory Planning<br />

As stated, the Department <strong>of</strong> Planning have advised that the DP does not require<br />

amending as the reduction in density (larger lots) proposed by the subdivision application<br />

still meets the designated R30 density. Contrary to this advice [and in accordance with the<br />

Scheme], Planning Services considers it imperative for the DP to be amended so that the<br />

<strong>Shire</strong>‘s Development Services <strong>of</strong>ficers can correctly apply the differing provisions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Residential Design Codes <strong>of</strong> Western Australia when assessing building applications. For<br />

example, differing provisions are applied to R17.5 and R30 lots regarding building setback<br />

to primary streets, the provision <strong>of</strong> open space and the capacity to further subdivide lots.<br />

Development Services <strong>of</strong>ficers can only lawfully apply the density adopted by the DP (or<br />

the Scheme maps). A departure from these requirements may expose the <strong>Shire</strong> to possible<br />

review <strong>of</strong> disputed building applications at the State Administrative Tribunal.<br />

Reduction in Dwelling Yield<br />

The subdivision application proposes twenty [20] lots averaging approximately 570m 2<br />

(R17.5) and two [2] triplex lots measuring 1102m 2 each (R30). The total dwelling yield from<br />

this configuration is twenty-six [26]; three [3] dwellings less than the existing approved plan<br />

<strong>of</strong> subdivision under the current DP. The reduction is considered insignificant in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the anticipated benefits gained to housing design and consumer choice. Consideration<br />

should; however, be given to refusing future proposed amendments to the DP that will<br />

result in a further or incremental reductions in dwelling yield. It should be noted that any<br />

reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> lots being released particularly cottage lots, may compromise<br />

housing affordability.<br />

Page 80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!