Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

106 Special Solidarity Fund KCE Reports 133
KCE Reports 133 Special Solidarity Fund 107 9.3 REPRESENTATIVENESS OF THE SAMPLE Overall, the representativeness of the sample increases over the years from more than half of the demands introduced in 2004 to over three quarters of the demands introduced in 2008 (see table 13). The evolution of the number of demands between 2004 and 2008 is generally mirrored in the SSF sample, with the exception of 2008 where the decline is less pronounced in the sample. Table 13: Number of demands in the SSF annual reports and in the SSF sample by year (introduction date). Number of demands Number of demands Percentage Year SSF (annual report) SSF (sample) sample/total 2004 3529 2040 57.81% 2005 2945 1737 58.98% 2006 2402 1569 65.32% 2007 2524 1831 72.54% 2008 2376 1811 76.22% The representativeness of the SSF sample is somewhat less when it concerns the decision taken (see figure 17). For the accepted demands, a decline in the number of demands between 2004 and 2008 was reported by the SSF (see also table 13). In the SSF sample, the pattern is different with a decline between 2004 and 2006, but an increase from 2007 onwards. This suggests that the representativeness of the SSF sample for accepted demands varies between years. For the declined demands, the SSF sample follows the SSF evolution more closely. Figure 15: Number of demands (bottom panels) and number of patients (top panels) in function of the decision taken by year (decision date). When viewed by who took the decision to accept or reject the demand, we find a less pronounced increase in representativeness over the years, except for the demands treated by an SSF physician (see figure 16). Overall however, the SSF sample follows the same evolution in number of demands as the SSF in total.
Page 1 and 2:
Optimalisatie van de werkingsproces
Page 3 and 4:
Optimalisatie van de werkingsproces
Page 5 and 6:
KCE reports 133A Bijzonder Solidari
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17:
Page 20 and 21:
2 Special Solidarity Fund KCE Repor
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
10 Special Solidarity Fund KCE Repo
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75: 56 Special Solidarity Fund KCE Repo
Page 118 and 119: 100 Special Solidarity Fund KCE Rep
Page 174 and 175:
156 Special Solidarity Fund KCE Rep
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Wettelijk depot : D/2010/10.273/44
Page 232 and 233:
37. HTA Magnetische Resonantie Beel
Page 234:
108. Tiotropium in de behandeling v
show all

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?