03.05.2013 Views

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Special Solidarity Fund <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 133<br />

2.1.3 Position of the SSF in the Belgian Health System<br />

2.1.3.1 The SSF position in practice: unique but complex<br />

Although the SSF is fully embed<strong>de</strong>d in the NIHDI, the SSF complements the Belgian<br />

compulsory health insurance system and reimburses certain medical expenses for rare<br />

diseases, rare indications and innovative techniques which are not (yet) refun<strong>de</strong>d by the<br />

compulsory health insurance. This situation creates a strange and unique positioning of<br />

the SSF within the national health system. The SSF belongs structurally to the<br />

compulsory health care insurance system (NIHDI) but performs activities<br />

2.1.3.2<br />

(reimbursement) which fall outsi<strong>de</strong> the regular system.<br />

Secondly, the SSF only intervenes when all other options/channels for reimbursement<br />

have been exhausted including reimbursement from private health insurance companies.<br />

This condition emphasizes that the scope of the SSF is outsi<strong>de</strong> the compulsory health<br />

insurance system but it is on the other hand confusing as the SSF belongs to the<br />

compulsory health insurance structure. The SSF is the last additional safety net to<br />

“ordinary” insurance coverage for medical care.<br />

This unique position makes the SSF heavily <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on the functioning of the various<br />

councils, committees or colleges and the evolution of the benefit package as a whole<br />

within the regular health insurance system. The services that are covered by the<br />

compulsory health insurance are <strong>de</strong>scribed in the nationally established fee schedule<br />

(the “nomenclature”), which is extremely <strong>de</strong>tailed and lists more than 8000 procedures<br />

and types of products. For each service, the i<strong>de</strong>ntification number, contractual fee and<br />

reimbursement rate are specified. Services not inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the fee schedule are not<br />

reimbursable. At regular intervals, new treatments or products are introduced into the<br />

benefits package and treatments that have become obsolete are removed. When the fee<br />

schedule/nomenclature is adapted too slowly to evolutions in the general medical<br />

practice, this will affect the SSF by keeping the reimbursement of these services and<br />

medical acts in the scope of action of the SSF instead of inclusion into the regular<br />

reimbursement system (compulsory health insurance).<br />

On the other hand <strong>de</strong>cisions taken by the SSF can also influence negotiations and<br />

activities of the committees, councils and colleges of the compulsory health insurance<br />

system. This could be the case for the negotiations with the pharmaceutical companies<br />

on the reimbursement level for new drugs led by the Drug Reimbursement Commission<br />

(DRC/CTG/CRM). In or<strong>de</strong>r not to influence these negotiations, the SSF, if it <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s to<br />

reimburse a drug before acceptance in the compulsory health insurance, can <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> to<br />

accept only a part (mostly a percentage) of the cost that is charged by the<br />

pharmaceutical company.<br />

One can notice that the relation between the SSF and other compulsory health<br />

insurance committees is bidirectional.<br />

Other protection mechanisms and the relation to the SSF<br />

Regulation on orphan drugs<br />

For orphan drugs the Belgian compulsory health insurance system introduced a specific<br />

reimbursement framework. The “College of medical directors on orphan drugs”<br />

(CMDOD) assesses the individual right of the patient to the reimbursement of an<br />

orphan drug, as far as the reimbursement conditions require such an assessment and as<br />

far as the advising physician of the patient’s sickness fund requested the advice of the<br />

College. The action field of the College interacts with the action field of the SSF. If the<br />

CMDOD <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s on the reimbursement of an “orphan drug” for a particular indication<br />

for an individual patient, the SSF will no longer <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> on the reimbursement of this<br />

drug, not even for indications the CMOD did not <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> on (off label use of the<br />

respective orphan drug). This implies that patients potentially benefiting from SSF<br />

reimbursement of a drug for a specific indication before the respective drug was<br />

accepted as an orphan drug, will no longer be reimbursed if the CMDOD did not<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong> that particular indication in its <strong>de</strong>cision 2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!