Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE
Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE
Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 Special Solidarity Fund <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 133<br />
2.1.3 Position of the SSF in the Belgian Health System<br />
2.1.3.1 The SSF position in practice: unique but complex<br />
Although the SSF is fully embed<strong>de</strong>d in the NIHDI, the SSF complements the Belgian<br />
compulsory health insurance system and reimburses certain medical expenses for rare<br />
diseases, rare indications and innovative techniques which are not (yet) refun<strong>de</strong>d by the<br />
compulsory health insurance. This situation creates a strange and unique positioning of<br />
the SSF within the national health system. The SSF belongs structurally to the<br />
compulsory health care insurance system (NIHDI) but performs activities<br />
2.1.3.2<br />
(reimbursement) which fall outsi<strong>de</strong> the regular system.<br />
Secondly, the SSF only intervenes when all other options/channels for reimbursement<br />
have been exhausted including reimbursement from private health insurance companies.<br />
This condition emphasizes that the scope of the SSF is outsi<strong>de</strong> the compulsory health<br />
insurance system but it is on the other hand confusing as the SSF belongs to the<br />
compulsory health insurance structure. The SSF is the last additional safety net to<br />
“ordinary” insurance coverage for medical care.<br />
This unique position makes the SSF heavily <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on the functioning of the various<br />
councils, committees or colleges and the evolution of the benefit package as a whole<br />
within the regular health insurance system. The services that are covered by the<br />
compulsory health insurance are <strong>de</strong>scribed in the nationally established fee schedule<br />
(the “nomenclature”), which is extremely <strong>de</strong>tailed and lists more than 8000 procedures<br />
and types of products. For each service, the i<strong>de</strong>ntification number, contractual fee and<br />
reimbursement rate are specified. Services not inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the fee schedule are not<br />
reimbursable. At regular intervals, new treatments or products are introduced into the<br />
benefits package and treatments that have become obsolete are removed. When the fee<br />
schedule/nomenclature is adapted too slowly to evolutions in the general medical<br />
practice, this will affect the SSF by keeping the reimbursement of these services and<br />
medical acts in the scope of action of the SSF instead of inclusion into the regular<br />
reimbursement system (compulsory health insurance).<br />
On the other hand <strong>de</strong>cisions taken by the SSF can also influence negotiations and<br />
activities of the committees, councils and colleges of the compulsory health insurance<br />
system. This could be the case for the negotiations with the pharmaceutical companies<br />
on the reimbursement level for new drugs led by the Drug Reimbursement Commission<br />
(DRC/CTG/CRM). In or<strong>de</strong>r not to influence these negotiations, the SSF, if it <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s to<br />
reimburse a drug before acceptance in the compulsory health insurance, can <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> to<br />
accept only a part (mostly a percentage) of the cost that is charged by the<br />
pharmaceutical company.<br />
One can notice that the relation between the SSF and other compulsory health<br />
insurance committees is bidirectional.<br />
Other protection mechanisms and the relation to the SSF<br />
Regulation on orphan drugs<br />
For orphan drugs the Belgian compulsory health insurance system introduced a specific<br />
reimbursement framework. The “College of medical directors on orphan drugs”<br />
(CMDOD) assesses the individual right of the patient to the reimbursement of an<br />
orphan drug, as far as the reimbursement conditions require such an assessment and as<br />
far as the advising physician of the patient’s sickness fund requested the advice of the<br />
College. The action field of the College interacts with the action field of the SSF. If the<br />
CMDOD <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s on the reimbursement of an “orphan drug” for a particular indication<br />
for an individual patient, the SSF will no longer <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> on the reimbursement of this<br />
drug, not even for indications the CMOD did not <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> on (off label use of the<br />
respective orphan drug). This implies that patients potentially benefiting from SSF<br />
reimbursement of a drug for a specific indication before the respective drug was<br />
accepted as an orphan drug, will no longer be reimbursed if the CMDOD did not<br />
inclu<strong>de</strong> that particular indication in its <strong>de</strong>cision 2 .