Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

KCE Reports 133 Special Solidarity Fund 111
Concerning the reason a demand was accepted, the representativeness is fairly good
(see figure 19). The apparent decline in representativeness for Article 25 §2 for more
recent years is an effect of scale: in 2006 and 2007, the sample contains about half the
number of actual number of demands, which is similar to 2004 or 2005. The first two
columns in the figure represent the criteria before the change in 2005 and can explain
the huge drop in demands for those criteria in more recent years.
For Article 25quater, no data were available for 2005 in the SSF annual reports, while in
the sample a number of demands were identified.