03.05.2013 Views

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

Optimalisatie van de werkingsprocessen van het Bijzonder ... - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 Special Solidarity Fund <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 133<br />

Figure 12: Proportion of completed SSF applications in the SSF sample by<br />

year in function of type between 2004 and 2008 (only applications taking<br />

longer than 30 days are shown)<br />

5.2.5 Appeal procedure<br />

If the patient disagrees with the <strong>de</strong>cisions of the SSF, he can launch an appeal to the<br />

labour court (Art. 580, 2° Gerechtelijk Wetboek 17 en art. 167, 1° <strong>van</strong> <strong>de</strong> Wet<br />

betreffen<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> verplichte verzekering voor geneeskundige verzorging en uitkeringen,<br />

gecoördineerd op 14 juli 1994). 1817<br />

The content of the competence of the labour courts was for a long time un<strong>de</strong>r<br />

discussion. It was affirmed by jurispru<strong>de</strong>nce and doctrine however that if the College of<br />

medical directors judges on the eligibility criteria, this is not a discretionary power. 22<br />

Discretionary power implies freedom of judgement (when a criterion is vague and has<br />

to be interpreted) and policy freedom (freedom to <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>, even if a situation complies<br />

with the criteria). The fact that the College can only strictly apply the legal criteria<br />

implies that in case the labour courts have full judicial power (on the reasonability of<br />

<strong>de</strong>cision-making and on the content of the <strong>de</strong>cision). With regard to the amount that<br />

will be allocated however, the college has discretionary powers. Consequently labour<br />

courts solely have the competence to judge the reasonability of <strong>de</strong>cision-making, not<br />

the content of the <strong>de</strong>cision (= the amount). This implies that a judge can annul the<br />

<strong>de</strong>cision of the College on the allocated amount but not judge on the amount itself.<br />

The numbers of registered cases that were introduced to the labour courts varies from<br />

100 in 2004, 74 in 2005, 44 in 2006, 52 in 2007 to 23 in 2008. These numbers reflect<br />

the number of cases that were brought to court during those years. They can be related<br />

to <strong>de</strong>cisions of the SSF from different years. In the SSF sample, the applications treated<br />

by the labour court amount to 144 <strong>de</strong>cisions (1.75% of all applications and 2.56% of all<br />

accepted applications). Mostly <strong>de</strong>cisions concerning diseases of the nervous or the<br />

circulatory system (see table 8); and implants and drugs are brought before the labour<br />

court (see table 9).<br />

17 For an overview of judgments of the labour courts, J. Diependaele, “Het Bijzon<strong>de</strong>r Solidariteitsfonds,<br />

blijven<strong>de</strong> bron <strong>van</strong> controverses” 19, J. Put, “Het Bijzon<strong>de</strong>r Solidariteitsfonds: interpretatie en beleid”, noot<br />

on<strong>de</strong>r Arbeidshof Gent 3 maart 2000 20, W. Bourry, “Het bijzon<strong>de</strong>r solidariteitsfonds: een <strong>de</strong>ur die nooit<br />

opengaat”. 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!