Thursday-Abstracts
Thursday-Abstracts
Thursday-Abstracts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine<br />
1469 Board #61 May 30, 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM<br />
Paleolithic diet and Exercise suppress hunger during Inter-<br />
Meal Interval By different Mechanisms<br />
Po-Ju Lin, Katarina Borer. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
Both exercise and higher fat and protein diet have been shown to reduce hunger ratings<br />
compared to high carbohydrate diet or sedentary condition. To find out whether this<br />
effect has a common mechanism, we examined how Paleolithic (P) versus Western diet<br />
(W), and exercise (X) versus sedentary (S) condition affected hunger ratings. Gastric<br />
inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) secretion and acetaminophen (APAP) absorption as a<br />
marker of gastric emptying (GE) served as a measure of gastrointestinal food transit<br />
(GFT). Although GIP has not been implicated in the control of hunger, GIP could<br />
affect hunger ratings indirectly by changing GE.<br />
PurPOsE: Examine the effect of P and W meal on hunger ratings and plasma GIP<br />
and APAP concentrations during X or S condition.<br />
METhOds: Twenty-four healthy postmenopausal women participated in 1 of 4<br />
conditions: S or 2 h of X (14 to 16 h) with P or W meal (PS, PX, WS, WX; n=8 each).<br />
The P meal contained 30% carbohydrate (CHO), 25% protein (PRO), and 45% FAT<br />
while W meal contained 60% CHO, 15% PRO, and 25% FAT. The meal was provided<br />
at 10 h. Participants were provided 20ml of liquid acetaminophen (160mg/5ml),<br />
30 minutes after the start of the meal. Plasma GIP and APAP concentrations were<br />
measured, and hunger ratings assessed with a visual analog scale, at hourly intervals<br />
during 3 h after the start of exercise. Changes in hunger ratings, GIP and APAP<br />
concentrations were analyzed with repeated measures mixed model ANOVA.<br />
rEsuLTs: Hunger ratings were overall significantly higher after W than after P meal<br />
(F=10.3, p