11.06.2013 Views

Thursday-Abstracts

Thursday-Abstracts

Thursday-Abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Thursday</strong>, May 30, 2013<br />

S204 Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement<br />

following each test, and every minute for three minutes thereafter. Heart rate was<br />

monitored throughout all tests.<br />

rEsuLTs: A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine if time until<br />

exhaustion increased due to the consumption of caffeine before exercise. No significant<br />

difference in the time to exhaustion was observed when compared to the placebo<br />

(caffeine time = 208.0±77.1 seconds, placebo time = 154.9±44.1 seconds).<br />

CONCLusION: These results suggest that caffeine does not have an effect on time to<br />

exhaustion following submaximal running.<br />

Key Words: caffeine, time to exhaustion.<br />

1106 Board #51 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM<br />

The Influence of Caffeine on Power Output and response<br />

Time<br />

Erika Rauk, David Connor, Allison Brumet, Eric Strubeck,<br />

Karen M. Brown, John G. Seifert. Montana State University,<br />

Bozeman, MT.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

Athletes consume caffeine supplements (CAF) in hopes of improving endurance<br />

performance, strength performance, and a reducing RPE. Caffeine is typically dosed<br />

on a per kg BW basis before or during exercise in a research setting and usually in a<br />

fasted state. It is likely that in a real world scenario caffeinated products are typically<br />

ingested by competitive and recreational athletes per given serving size or volume,<br />

regardless of BW. Caffeine is known to be a central nervous system stimulant. It is not<br />

known, however, if CAF would affect a marker of central fatigue following endurance<br />

exercise.<br />

PurPOsE: To compare auditory response time (RT), HR, RPE, metabolic, and power<br />

output (PO) responses between the ingestion of a commercially available CAF product<br />

and a flavored, non-caloric placebo (PL) during endurance cycling.<br />

METhOds: Fourteen subjects completed a 120 min work bout which was divided<br />

into 8x15 min intervals (13 min at 70% VO2max, 2 min at 90% VO2max), and ended<br />

with a 6 min PO performance task. Caffeine was ingested at a dose of 256 mg caffeine/<br />

hr; 200 mL/hr of plain water was co-ingested with CAF and PL. Blood glucose, HR,<br />

RPE, RER, and RT were measured throughout the 120 min exercise. The PO task<br />

required subjects to cycle at their highest sustainable power output for 6 min. Cycling<br />

resistance was set at 5% BW. The CAF and PL treatments were administered in a<br />

double blind, randomly assigned protocol. All subjects exercised at 3 hrs post prandial.<br />

Data are listed as mean (+ SD).<br />

rEsuLTs: No statistical differences between treatments were observed for mean PO<br />

(p=.08, CAF: 290 +57, PL: 282 +63 W), RT (p=.06, CAF: 0.232 +.06, PL: 0.226 +.04<br />

sec), HR (CAF: 143.1 + 15.6, PL: 141.0 + 14.5 bpm), RPE (CAF: 13.5 + 1.2, PL: 13.8<br />

+ 1.9), and RER (CAF: .87 +.04, PL: .86 +.04), and BG (CAF: 4.9 +.6, PL: 4.7 +.8<br />

mM/L).<br />

CONCLusION: Ingestion of a moderate dose of CAF (~6.8 mg/kg BW) did not result<br />

in significant improvements in RT and PO when evaluated against a non-caloric PL.<br />

Additionally, CAF ingestion did not change substrate utilization, as measured by BG and<br />

RER, during exercise. These results indicate that the CAF formula used in this study has<br />

minimal influence on physiological function and performance under the given conditions.<br />

This study was supported by a grant from PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc.<br />

1107 Board #52 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM<br />

The Influence Of Carbohydrate, Protein, and Caffeine On<br />

Power Output and response Time<br />

David A. Connor, Eric Strubeck, Karen M. Brown, John G.<br />

Seifert. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

Caffeine has been reported to confer numerous benefits such as improved endurance<br />

and high intensity performances, reaction time and fat metabolism, and reduced RPE.<br />

The ingestion of CHO generally leads to improved endurance and high intensity<br />

performances while markers of central fatigue are mitigated with the feeding. There<br />

has been interest if combining CHO and caffeine would have a synergistic effect<br />

on response time and performance as the CHO would aid in physical performance<br />

while the caffeine would potentially improve markers of central fatigue. Purpose. To<br />

compare auditory response time (RT), power output (PO), and metabolic responses<br />

between a commercially available CHO + PRO + caffeine sports gel (GEL) and a<br />

caffeine supplement (CAF) during endurance cycling. Methods. 14 cyclists completed<br />

two cycling trials by ingesting GEL (22.5g CHO/hr, 3.75g PRO/hr, 188 mg caffeine/<br />

hr) or CAF (256 mg caffeine/hr) along with 200 mL/hr of water during the 2 hr<br />

exercise. Auditory RT was assessed by averaging stop switch times from10 beeps.<br />

Exercise was divided into 8x15 min intervals of 13 min at 70% VO2max and 2 min<br />

at 90% VO2max. Blood glucose (BG), RT, HR, RPE, and RER were also collected<br />

during the test. After the 2 hr ride, riders completed a 6 min cycling test where they<br />

attempted maintain as great of PO as possible at a resistance of 5% BW. Significance<br />

was set at p < 0.05. All data are listed as mean (+SD). Results. The GEL resulted in<br />

statistically greater mean PO (309.1 +/- 60 W vs. 290.2 +/- 57 W); RT (0.219 +/- .049<br />

sec vs. 0.232 +/- .060 sec); BG (5.5 +/- 0.8 mM/L vs. 4.9 +/- 0.7 mM/L), and lower<br />

HR (138.5 +/- 16.0 bpm vs. 143.1 +/- 15.6 bpm) and RPE (13.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 13.5 +/-<br />

1.2) than the CAF treatment. Conclusions. Co-ingestion of CHO, PRO and caffeine<br />

MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE ®<br />

significantly improved RT and PO (by 5.7% and by 6.5%, respectively) compared to<br />

CAF even though the caffeine dose was 27% lower with GEL than CAF. The present<br />

study mimicked real life conditions by having subjects fed prior to exercise, providing<br />

doses that represented what may occur in a ‘real world’ setting, and by measuring<br />

performance by a muscular PO test and a measure that may be indicative of central<br />

fatigue. These results demonstrate the synergistic effects of CHO, PRO, and caffeine<br />

and the performance benefits to athletes. Supported by a grant from PacificHealth<br />

Laboratories, Inc.<br />

1108 Board #53 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM<br />

role of Caffeine Intake on short Bouts Frequency in Light<br />

and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical activity Patterns<br />

Pedro B. Júdice, Catarina N. Matias, Diana A. Santos, João<br />

P. Magalhães, Luís B. Sardinha, Analiza M. Silva. Technical<br />

University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

Shifting sedentary behavior (SedB) to light intensity physical activity (LPA) by<br />

introducing short bouts (SB) into daily routine is expected to contribute to higher<br />

PA energy expenditure (PAEE). If caffeine (Caf) intake plays a role in increasing the<br />

frequency of SB during free-living conditions is unknown. Purposes: The aim of this<br />

study was twofold: i) to determine the impact of a moderate dose of Caf on daily<br />

number of SB of at least 1 up to 5 min of either LPA or moderate-to-vigorous PA<br />

(MVPA) and PAEE; ii) to analyze the association between SB and PAEE under both<br />

conditions.<br />

METhOds: Using a double-blind crossover trial (ClinicalTrials.<br />

govID;NCT01477294) with two conditions (4-day each with 3-day washout) randomly<br />

ordered as Caf (5mg/kg/day) and placebo (Plc) (malt-dextrin) administered twice a<br />

day (2.5mg/kg), a total of 21 active males, low caffeine users (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!