Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine CSA of leg musculature in both males and females with males having a greater response in the quadriceps and hamstrings. 1165 Board #110 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM Effects Of accelerometer-based Intervention To Go Beyond Physical activity reference For Japanese On The Prevalence Of Low-back Pain: a randomized Control Trial Motohiko Miyachi 1 , Haruka Murakami 1 , Ryoko Kawakami 2 , Nobuyuki Miyatake 3 , Takeyuki Numata 4 , Izumi Tabata, FACSM 5 . 1 National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Tokyo, Japan. 2 Waseda University, Saitama, Japan. 3 Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan. 4 Okayama Southern Institute of Health, Oakayama, Japan. 5 Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan. (Sponsor: Izumi Tabata, FACSM) (No relationships reported) Low-back pain is a leading symptom in the Japanese population. The evidence for an association between amount of physical activity and prevalence of low-back pain is insufficient. PurPOsE: Using a randomized-control trial design, we determined the effects of accelerometer-based intervention to go beyond the Physical Activity Reference value for Japanese (PARJ) on the prevalence of low-back pain. METhOds: A total of 821 healthy men and women, 30 to 64 years old, were divided into the active group (n=345) who met PARJ (23 METs-h/week of MVPA) or the inactive group (n=476) who did not meet PARJ. Moreover, the participants of the inactive group were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=239) or the control group (n=237). The control group was instructed not to alter their normal activity levels throughout the study period. The intervention group received accelerometer-based counseling to go beyond PARJ for one year. The prevalence of low-back pain was evaluated by the question: “did you have low-back pain lasting longer than 3 months during the last 12 months?” The point prevalence of low-back pain was based on that with a current episode of pain. Adjusting hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for the prevalence of low-back pain were obtained using the Cox hazard regression model. rEsuLTs: Among the 821 participants, 526 had no low-back pain at baseline and have been followed-up for more than one year. In the intervention group, the amount of physical activity significantly increased and the mean value reached 23 METs-h/week after one year of intervention. There was no such change in the control group. Seventythree participants reported low-back pain during the average 2.3-year observation period (range: 1-4 years). Using the control group as a reference, the adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI) for the intervention and active groups were 0.50 (0.27-0.94) and 0.65 (0.38-1.09), respectively. CONCLusIONs: These results suggest that the accelerometer-based intervention to go beyond 23 METs-h/week defined as PARJ attenuates the prevalence of low-back pain by ~50%. (NCT00926744) C-31 Free Communication/Poster - Epidemiology of Physical Activity in Pregnancy May 30, 2013, 7:30 AM - 12:30 PM Room: Hall C 1166 Board #111 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM description of Motives for and Barriers to Exercising across Pregnancy Erin E. White1 , Karin A. Pfeiffer, FACSM2 , Claudia B. Holzman2 , Daniel R. Gould2 , James M. Pivarnik, FACSM2 . 1 2 Winona State University, Winona, MN. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. (No relationships reported) Maternal exercise usually decreases as gestation progresses even though there are numerous benefits derived from continuing this behavior during pregnancy. Understanding motives for and barriers to maternal exercise by trimester may allow physical activity professionals to better individualize maternal exercise programs and increase adherence. PurPOsE: The purpose of this study was to describe the most frequent motives for and barriers to maternal exercise by trimester. METhOds: Women (n = 295) who belonged to a commercial fitness club and had given birth within the last five years completed a retrospective survey regarding trimester-specific motives for and barriers to exercise during pregnancy. Women chose up to three motives and barriers per trimester from a predetermined list (including 9 motives and 27 barriers) based on previous literature. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the frequency of motives and barriers. rEsuLTs: Mean ± SD maternal age at delivery was 27 ± 5.1 yr. Maternal height Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement S219 and weight at the time of survey completion were 165.2 ± 6.5 cm and 79.5 ± 20.8 kg, respectively. The top two primary motives in trimesters 1, 2, and 3 were to stay healthy (37.4%, 35.5%, and 32.9%, respectively) and weight control (19.8%, 27.1%, and 25.5%, respectively). The third primary motive in trimesters 1 and 2 was fitness (13.7% and 11.6%, respectively); while in trimester 3 it was to relieve stress (10.7%). The top primary barrier to exercise across all three trimesters was lack of energy (27.0%, 18.9%, and 19.4%, respectively). Other primary barriers in trimester 1 were pregnancy-related illness (18.5%) and lack of time (9.3%). Trimester 2 primary barriers included lack of time (9.6%) and lack of motivation (8.2%), while third trimester primary barriers included exercise being too uncomfortable (17.2%) and on bed rest (6.8%). CONCLusION: While the motives of exercise do not change considerably across trimesters of pregnancy, barriers do. More women may continue to exercise throughout pregnancy if they are made aware of various modalities to make exercise more comfortable for them, especially as pregnancy progresses. In addition, discussing time management skills and how to overcome a “lack of energy” may increase exercise participation. Funding: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Student Award 1167 Board #112 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM reliability and Validity of Three Physical activity Measurements during Pregnancy and Postpartum Deanna M. L. Phelan1 , Mallory R. Marshall1 , Rebecca A. Schlaff2 , Alaina K. Vince1 , Karin A. Pfeiffer, FACSM1 , James M. Pivarnik, FACSM1 . 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 2Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI. (No relationships reported) Quality physical activity (PA) studies during pregnancy depend on the accuracy of data collected. However, little is known about the reliability and validity of current modalities designed to measure PA during pregnancy in a free-living environment. PurPOsE: Our purpose was to assess reliability and validity of three PA measures used during pregnancy and postpartum: the Omron pedometer (PED; steps/day/ hr) the SenseWear Armband (SA; kcal/kg/hr), and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ; met.min/week). METhOds: Subjects (n=20) wore the PED and SA devices in free-living environments for two consecutive weeks at 20 weeks gestation, 32 weeks gestation, and 12 weeks postpartum. At the end of each week of wear, subjects completed the PPAQ recall instrument to evaluate the prior week’s PA. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard errors of measurement (SEM) were calculated to estimate reliability for the two weeks of wear/recall at each of the three time points. Convergent validity was assessed by averaging consecutive week values for every measure at each time point and performing Pearson correlations among the three modalities. rEsuLTs: Across the study period, PA estimates were 497±192 steps/day/hour, 13.3±3.7 kcal/kg/hour, and 15853±5702 met.min/week. ICC (SEM) values for PED at 20 weeks, 32 weeks, and 12 weeks postpartum were 0.42 (126), 0.89 (53), and 0.86 (93), respectively. Reliability of SA was lower than PED and PPAQ at all three time points (20 weeks=0.55 (1.3), 32 weeks=0.42 (1.2), postpartum=0.19 (2.8)). The PPAQ was more reliable across both pregnancy time points, compared to postpartum (0.88 (3867) and 0.83 (3820) versus 0.57 (5592) for postpartum). Validity estimates were low and variable (-0.37-0.30). CONCLusIONs: Overall, reliability was acceptable for use of these measurement techniques to assess PA in free-living environments during pregnancy. However, convergent validity was poor among the three instruments. Poor validity could be a function of the three modalities measuring different constructs in a free-living environment. In addition, increasing the sample size of our ongoing investigation will allow further and more detailed evaluation of the relationship among these PA measurement modalities during pregnancy and postpartum. 1168 Board #113 May 30, 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM Plasma Lipid Changes associated with Lifestyle Factors across Pregnancy Christina G. Campbell 1 , Courtney K. Blomme 1 , Diana R. DiFabio 1 , Kai Ling Kong 1 , Lorraine M. Lanningham-Foster 1 , Danielle J. Richardson 1 , Katie M. Smith 1 , William G. Thorland 2 . 1 Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 2 Nurse Family Partnership, Denver, CO. (Sponsor: Gregory J. Welk, FACSM) (No relationships reported) Plasma lipid values are known to increase as pregnancy progresses, however the role that lifestyle factors may have on this physiological response during pregnancy is not well defined. PurPOsE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential factors that may influence the change in lipid values across pregnancy. METhOds: At weeks 18 and 35 of pregnancy, 57 women provided a fasted blood sample, 3-day weighed diet record, and wore an activity armband for a 7-day, 24hour period. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the role of the <strong>Abstracts</strong> were prepared by the authors and printed as submitted. <strong>Thursday</strong>, May 30, 2013
<strong>Thursday</strong>, May 30, 2013 S220 Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement following independent variables on lipids: body weight, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), daily energy expenditure (EE), daily energy intake (EI), and weekly minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) performed in ≥10-minute bouts. Measured plasma lipids included total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides (TG); low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was calculated. In each regression model, the respective lipid values (TC, LDL, HDL, or TG) at week 18 were also entered as independent values to adjust for variation in the week 35 values. rEsuLTs: EI was 2145 ± 446 and 2320 ± 497 kcals/d; EE was 1714 ± 280 and 1811 ± 273 kcals/d; and MVPA was 171.5 ± 112.8 and 157.9 ± 143.9 min/wk at week 18 and 35, respectively. While both TC (215.0 ± 36.3 and 267.1 ± 57.3 mg/dL at week 18 and 35, respectively) and LDL (115.0 ± 30.5 and 154.4 ± 48.7 mg/dL at week 18 and 35, respectively) levels at week 35 were related to corresponding lipid levels at week 18 (P
- Page 1 and 2: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S176 Vol. 45
- Page 3 and 4: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S178 Vol. 45
- Page 5 and 6: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S180 Vol. 45
- Page 7 and 8: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S182 Vol. 45
- Page 9 and 10: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S184 Vol. 45
- Page 11 and 12: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S186 Vol. 45
- Page 13 and 14: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S188 Vol. 45
- Page 15 and 16: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S190 Vol. 45
- Page 17 and 18: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S192 Vol. 45
- Page 19 and 20: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S194 Vol. 45
- Page 21 and 22: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S196 Vol. 45
- Page 23 and 24: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S198 Vol. 45
- Page 25 and 26: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S200 Vol. 45
- Page 27 and 28: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S202 Vol. 45
- Page 29 and 30: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S204 Vol. 45
- Page 31 and 32: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S206 Vol. 45
- Page 33 and 34: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S208 Vol. 45
- Page 35 and 36: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S210 Vol. 45
- Page 37 and 38: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S212 Vol. 45
- Page 39 and 40: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S214 Vol. 45
- Page 41 and 42: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S216 Vol. 45
- Page 43: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S218 Vol. 45
- Page 47 and 48: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S222 Vol. 45
- Page 49 and 50: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S224 Vol. 45
- Page 51 and 52: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S226 Vol. 45
- Page 53 and 54: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S228 Vol. 45
- Page 55 and 56: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S230 Vol. 45
- Page 57 and 58: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S232 Vol. 45
- Page 59 and 60: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S234 Vol. 45
- Page 61 and 62: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S236 Vol. 45
- Page 63 and 64: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S238 Vol. 45
- Page 65 and 66: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S240 Vol. 45
- Page 67 and 68: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S242 Vol. 45
- Page 69 and 70: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S244 Vol. 45
- Page 71 and 72: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S246 Vol. 45
- Page 73 and 74: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S248 Vol. 45
- Page 75 and 76: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S250 Vol. 45
- Page 77 and 78: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S252 Vol. 45
- Page 79 and 80: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S254 Vol. 45
- Page 81 and 82: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S256 Vol. 45
- Page 83 and 84: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S258 Vol. 45
- Page 85 and 86: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S260 Vol. 45
- Page 87 and 88: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S262 Vol. 45
- Page 89 and 90: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S264 Vol. 45
- Page 91 and 92: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S266 Vol. 45
- Page 93 and 94: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S268 Vol. 45
- Page 95 and 96:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S270 Vol. 45
- Page 97 and 98:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S272 Vol. 45
- Page 99 and 100:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S274 Vol. 45
- Page 101 and 102:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S276 Vol. 45
- Page 103 and 104:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S278 Vol. 45
- Page 105 and 106:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S280 Vol. 45
- Page 107 and 108:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S282 Vol. 45
- Page 109 and 110:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S284 Vol. 45
- Page 111 and 112:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S286 Vol. 45
- Page 113 and 114:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S288 Vol. 45
- Page 115 and 116:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S290 Vol. 45
- Page 117 and 118:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S292 Vol. 45
- Page 119 and 120:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S294 Vol. 45
- Page 121 and 122:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S296 Vol. 45
- Page 123 and 124:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S298 Vol. 45
- Page 125 and 126:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S300 Vol. 45
- Page 127 and 128:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S302 Vol. 45
- Page 129 and 130:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S304 Vol. 45
- Page 131 and 132:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S306 Vol. 45
- Page 133 and 134:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S308 Vol. 45
- Page 135 and 136:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S310 Vol. 45
- Page 137 and 138:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S312 Vol. 45
- Page 139 and 140:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S314 Vol. 45
- Page 141 and 142:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S316 Vol. 45
- Page 143 and 144:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S318 Vol. 45
- Page 145 and 146:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S320 Vol. 45
- Page 147 and 148:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S322 Vol. 45
- Page 149 and 150:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S324 Vol. 45
- Page 151 and 152:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S326 Vol. 45
- Page 153 and 154:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S328 Vol. 45
- Page 155 and 156:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S330 Vol. 45
- Page 157 and 158:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S332 Vol. 45
- Page 159 and 160:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S334 Vol. 45
- Page 161 and 162:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S336 Vol. 45
- Page 163 and 164:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S338 Vol. 45
- Page 165 and 166:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S340 Vol. 45
- Page 167 and 168:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S342 Vol. 45
- Page 169 and 170:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S344 Vol. 45
- Page 171 and 172:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S346 Vol. 45
- Page 173 and 174:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S348 Vol. 45
- Page 175 and 176:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S350 Vol. 45
- Page 177 and 178:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S352 Vol. 45