11.06.2013 Views

Thursday-Abstracts

Thursday-Abstracts

Thursday-Abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine<br />

rEsuLTs: Both groups significantly improved between each pre/post trial. The<br />

children improved 0.7007 seconds (p=.00188) and the adults improved .9632 seconds<br />

(p=.00365).<br />

CONCLusIONs: Results show that subjects in this investigation saw positive effects<br />

from physical stimulation on the receptors of the feet. This study suggests that those<br />

experiencing balance deficiencies, such as the elderly population, may benefit from<br />

daily brushings of the feet.<br />

1251 Board #197 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM<br />

Concurrent Validity Of Two Postural stability Tests In a<br />

healthy Population<br />

A. Page Glave1 , Jennifer J. Didier1 , Jacqueline Weatherwax1 ,<br />

Casidhe Leonard1 , Sarah Barragan1 , Robert Fiasco1 , Vanessa<br />

Fiaud2 . 1Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX. 2West Texas A & M University, Canyon, TX.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

The Biodex Balance System Limits of Stability Test (LOS) and Star Excursion Balance<br />

Test (SEBT) are described as measuring dynamic aspects of balance. Practitioners<br />

tend to base test choice on their assessment of face validity in relation to the desired<br />

outcome. This is commonplace with psychomotor testing, but it is important to<br />

establish concurrent validity to ensure the same construct is being assessed.<br />

PurPOsE: To examine concurrent validity of LOS and SEBT.<br />

METhOds: Healthy adult participants (n = 31) were randomly assigned to different<br />

testing orders to randomize the order of tests within the LOS and SEBT tests. LOS<br />

was tested under more stable (12) and less stable (6) conditions using the moderate<br />

setting. SEBT was tested on the right and left legs. Following practice, three trials<br />

were obtained on both tests. LOS scores were averaged using the system protocol,<br />

which does not control for height in dynamic tests. Outliers were eliminated for SEBT<br />

scores and scores were averaged. SEBT directions were offset by 180o to approximate<br />

similar movement patterns to LOS direction. The ipsilateral leg score was used for<br />

the diagonal and frontal directions; bilateral scores were combined for the anterior<br />

and posterior directions on the SEBT. Subjects’ height affects balance, thus partial<br />

correlations were used to examine the relationship between SEBT and LOS while<br />

controlling for height. SAS 9.2 was used to analyze the data.<br />

rEsuLTs: Height was directly related to all directions for SEBT (r = 0.53 – 0.59, p<br />

< .01) and inversely related to some directions for LOS (6: right – r = -0.41, back – r<br />

= -0.41, back left – r = -0.36; 12: front – r = -0.39, back left – r = -0.53; all p ≤ .05).<br />

There were no significant partial correlations between SEBT and LOS scores. Partial<br />

correlations were negative for all directions between SEBT and LOS except for 270o<br />

and right at a platform setting of 12 on the LOS (rSEBT, LOS. H = 0.09, p = .71).<br />

CONCLusIONs: It appears the SEBT and LOS assess different balance constructs,<br />

though both involve dynamic balance. Using these tests could identify different<br />

balance deficiencies and/or potential injury risks. Additional research is needed to<br />

determine and define what specific constructs of balance are being assessed.<br />

1252 Board #198 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM<br />

Effect of Water Immersion and Jet resistance on Postural<br />

sway<br />

Matt Baldwin, Talin Louder, Breanna Studenka, Eadric Bressel.<br />

Utah State University, Logan, UT.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

Assessment of postural sway or balance is a common practice in athletic rehabilitation<br />

and special populations. Researchers have postulated that water immersion has an<br />

effect on balance due to buoyancy, in part, but the extent of this effect has not been<br />

determined.<br />

PurPOsE: To quantify the effect of water depth and water jet intensity on measures<br />

of postural sway.<br />

METhOds: Ten healthy participants (female = 5, male = 5: Age = 24.1 ± 3.6 years;<br />

weight = 721.5 ± 222.6 N) volunteered for the study. Postural sway measurements<br />

were collected using a waterproof force plate (20 Hz) as participants stood quietly for<br />

90 s, with eyes open, in a double support stance under the following conditions: Land<br />

and water immersion at the level of the greater trochanter (GT) and xiphoid (XI). At<br />

the xiphoid water depth, participants were also perturbed by underwater jets at three<br />

intensities (20%, 40%, and 60%). The area covered by the trajectory of the center of<br />

pressure was computed as a 95% confidence ellipse which served as the dependent<br />

measure in the study. The effect of water depth and jet intensity on the 95% ellipse was<br />

determined using repeated-measures ANOVA with follow-up comparisons.<br />

rEsuLTs: There was a significant main effect (F = 36.68, p = 0.0001) and followup<br />

comparisons revealed that the 95% ellipse area was greater for GT and XI depths<br />

(6.76 ± 4.31 cm2 and 13.4 ± 5.14 cm2, respectfully) when compared to land (3.13 ±<br />

2.48 cm2). Differences were also observed across jet intensities (20% = 14.81 ± 4.98<br />

cm2, 40% = 32.67 ± 10.55 cm2, 60% = 76.65 ± 24.42 cm2, p = 0.003 - 0.026) except<br />

between the 0%/xiphoid condition and the 20%/xiphoid condition (p = 0.530).<br />

CONCLusION: Water immersion and jet intensity have a significant effect on<br />

balance. Based on the results of this study, balance becomes progressively more<br />

challenging with increasing water depth and jet intensity. However, no significant<br />

change was observed when comparing no jet resistance to 20% jet intensity. Therefore,<br />

Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement S241<br />

in clinical applications where desired functional outcomes include improvement in<br />

postural stability, water immersion to the XI and jet intensities at or above 40% may be<br />

more effective than land therapies in stimulating postural sway.<br />

1253 Board #199 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM<br />

Familiarization Trial Needed When Measuring Postural<br />

sway with a Mobile device<br />

Carina A. Staab, Elizabeth J. Epps, Jeremy A. Patterson,<br />

FACSM. Wichita State University, Wichita, KS.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

The latest Smartphone’s have built-in motion sensors called a tri-axis accelerometer.<br />

One of the clinical measures that can take advantage of this technology is balance<br />

assessment. Previous studies assessing balance show the need for familiarization.<br />

PurPOsE: The purpose of this study was to determine if a familiarization test was<br />

needed when using Smartphone devices to measure balance.<br />

METhOds: 49 healthy individuals (18 male, 31 female; 23.1±2.6 years) performed a<br />

bilateral, tandem, and single leg balance tests. A barefoot familiarization was recorded<br />

for the 3 stances, and then follow-up testing was done in barefoot, five-toed shoes, and<br />

athletic shoes. All trials consisted of 10-second measures with eyes closed and were<br />

random in order. A commercially available Smartphone was used to determine postural<br />

sway. One trial was completed for each test with an average of 4-minute rest between<br />

trials.<br />

rEsuLTs: Significant differences were demonstrated between familiarization and<br />

each of the assessments that followed (barefoot p=0.007; five-toed shoes p=0.023;<br />

athletic shoe p=0.028). No differences were observed between barefoot and five-toed<br />

shoes (p=0.576), barefoot and athletic shoes (p=0.521), or five-toed shoes and athletic<br />

shoes (p=0.901).<br />

CONCLusION: Outcomes of this study show that balance data measured with a<br />

mobile device requires a familiarization trial. This is in agreement with previous<br />

publications using laboratory based balance assessment equipment and shows that<br />

familiarization is necessary when assessing balance regardless of equipment used.<br />

This may also suggest good consistency with Smartphone technology but should to be<br />

studied further.<br />

1254 Board #200 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM<br />

Influence Of age On Balance Initiation<br />

Karen Roemer 1 , Stephanie Hamilton 2 , Louisa Raisbeck 2 .<br />

1 Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA. 2 Michigan<br />

Technological University, Houghton, MI.<br />

(No relationships reported)<br />

Single Leg Stance (SLS) is often used as a test in clinical settings to assess balance<br />

disorders and risk of falling in various age groups (Berg, 1989; Jonsson et al., 2004).<br />

Establishing the SLS requires controlled transfer of weight from one base of support<br />

to another, which has been shown to deteriorate with age for various activities such as<br />

gait, unrestricted stance, or sit-to-stand movements (Jonsson et al., 2007; Prado et al.,<br />

2011). Little is known about the age related effects on the early phase of establishing<br />

a SLS.<br />

PurPOsE: This study aims to investigate the effect of age on the early phase of<br />

balance initiation during a SLS.<br />

METhOds: Twenty-three subjects (Y: n=15, Mean + SD; Age= 22.5 + 3.4; Wt= 63.2<br />

+ 10.5 kg; Ht = 168.9 + 9.3 cm; O: Y: n=8, Mean + SD; Age= 67.6 + 4.1; Wt= 63.2 +<br />

13.9 kg; Ht = 162.6 + 10.4 cm) who were considered healthy with no previous injuries<br />

or history of falls performed a SLS on a force plate. Subjects were instructed to stand<br />

behind the force plate and to perform a step onto the force plate to establish SLS<br />

and maintain it for 15 seconds. The first second of SLS (initiation) and the next two<br />

seconds (maintenance) were analyzed. Dependent variables: maximum and average<br />

sway velocity, sway area, semi-major and semi-minor axes of the sway area. Variables<br />

were analyzed for the dominant leg. Leg dominance was determined using the balance<br />

recovery test. One-way ANOVA was used to identify differences between Y and O.<br />

rEsuLTs: O compared to Y showed significantly increased values for average sway<br />

velocity (O: 18.9±7.2cm/s, Y: 13.1 ±3.2cm/s, p=0.015) in the initial phase and in the<br />

maintenance phase for average sway velocity (O: 12.5±4.8cm/s , Y: 6.1 ±2.1cm/s,<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!