Thursday-Abstracts
Thursday-Abstracts
Thursday-Abstracts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine<br />
CONCLusION: Our results indicate that transfer of adapted gait parameters to<br />
overground gait following split-belt walking are greater than unilateral stepping,<br />
however some populations with gait asymmetry may benefit from unilateral stepping if<br />
they lack access to a split-belt treadmill.<br />
D-17 Free Communication/Slide - Advancing<br />
Physical Activity Assessment Methods<br />
May 30, 2013, 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM<br />
Room: 125<br />
1375 Chair: Scott Crouter, FACSM. University of Massachusetts<br />
Boston, Boston, MA.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
1376 May 30, 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM<br />
Expressing Energy Expenditure in youth: allometric scaling<br />
and Corrected METs<br />
Brian C. Rider, David R. Bassett, Jr., FACSM, Dawn P. Coe.<br />
University Of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
Many physiological variables show associations with body size. It has been shown<br />
that scaling submaximal VO2 values helps to normalize the data across individuals<br />
of different size/age/gender. This reduces the likelihood that differences in VO2 will<br />
appear to exist, when in fact, they are due primarily to differences in body size. This<br />
could possibly be achieved by using allometric scaling or corrected METS (i.e. activity<br />
EE/estimated RMR).<br />
PurPOsE: To explore the use of allometric scaling and corrected METs to achieve<br />
better estimates of children’s energy expenditure (EE) based on speed of locomotion,<br />
during treadmill walking and running.<br />
METhOds: Mean data were taken from 13 studies that contained childhood (8-<br />
14y) VO2 data, obtained during submaximal treadmill tests. Due to the fact that each<br />
study had different numbers of participants, studies with a greater number numbers<br />
of subjects were assigned more weight. Linear regression was used to determine the<br />
relationship between VO2 and treadmill speed. For the allometric scaling method,<br />
body mass was expressed in ml.kg-0.75 min-1. Corrected METs were computed using<br />
the Schofield equation to estimate RMR, using both weight (w) and height and weight<br />
(h&w).<br />
rEsuLTs: Both allometric scaling and corrected METs improved the ability to<br />
estimate EE based on speed of locomotion. There was a tighter relationship between<br />
speed and VO2 scaled to body weight raised to the 0.75 power, than there was between<br />
speed and standard METs (i.e. activity EE/3.5) [Walking: r2= 0.6482, vs. 0.2859.<br />
Running: r2= 0.8247 vs. 0.6281]. Corrected METs also showed tighter relationships<br />
with speed than did standard METs [Walking: r2= 0.8722 (h&w) and 0.7942(w) vs<br />
0.2859; Running: r2= 0.4773 (h&w) and 0.6421 (w) vs 0.6281].<br />
CONCLusION: Both allometric scaling and corrected METs yielded stronger<br />
associations with speed of locomotion, than standard METs. Corrected METs also<br />
showed a stronger correlation with submaximal running speeds, but only when using<br />
the Schofield equation based on weight. Further research is needed to determine the<br />
best method available for normalizing energy costs of treadmill walking and running<br />
for youth of different sizes/genders/ages.<br />
1377 May 30, 1:15 PM - 1:30 PM<br />
using receiver Operating Characteristic Curves and<br />
accelerometry To Establish step-count Guidelines For<br />
Twelve-year-old Children<br />
Timothy Fulton, Fabio Fontana, Kent Ingvalson, Kimberly<br />
Decker, Ripley Marston, Kevin Finn. University of Northern<br />
Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
Current physical activity guidelines are based on frequency, duration, and intensity<br />
of physical activity. Recollection of physical activity duration and understanding of<br />
physical activity intensity are difficult tasks. Restructuring current guidelines to stepcounts<br />
may facilitate the identification of children not reaching adequate physical<br />
activity levels.<br />
PurPOsE: To measure the ability of step-counts to discriminate between adequate<br />
and inadequate physical activity levels, and establish gender-specific step-count<br />
guidelines for twelve-year-old children.<br />
METhOds: This study employed a fully cross-sectional design. A total of 106<br />
children participated in the study (N girls = 62; N boys = 44). Participants wore a pedometer<br />
and an accelerometer for one full day, and recorded the number of steps on an<br />
activity log. The Freedson equation was used to compute duration and intensity of<br />
exercise. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to determine the ability<br />
of step-counts to discriminate between adequate and inadequate physical activity<br />
Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement S261<br />
levels. Optimal cutoff points were based on sensitive scores larger than .80 due to the<br />
importance of identifying children and adolescents with inadequate levels of physical<br />
activity, and the maximum sum of sensitive and specificity scores.<br />
rEsuLTs: The area under the curve for each of the sub-groups (AUCgirls = .85,<br />
95% CI = .76 - .95, p > .01; AUCboys = .85, 95% CI = .72 - .97, p > .01) was high,<br />
indicating good ability of step-counts to discriminate among children with adequate<br />
and inadequate levels of physical activity. To achieve minimum daily physical activity,<br />
we suggest 12,007 and 12,605 steps/day for 12-year-old girls and boys respectively.<br />
CONCLusION: Pedometer step-counts discriminate well among children with<br />
adequate and inadequate levels of physical activity. To our knowledge, this is the<br />
first attempt to develop gender- and age-specific guidelines. With the current levels<br />
of obesity on the rise, the use of the suggested step-count guidelines may be a useful<br />
initial epidemiological step in the identification of children with low levels of physical<br />
activity.<br />
1378 May 30, 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM<br />
Comparisons Of Prediction Equations For Estimating<br />
Energy Expenditure In youth<br />
Youngwon Kim 1 , Scott E. Crouter, FACSM 2 , Jung-Min Lee 1 ,<br />
Yang Bai 1 , Glenn A. Gaesser, FACSM 3 , Gregory J. Welk,<br />
FACSM 1 . 1 Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 2 University of<br />
Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA. 3 Arizona State University,<br />
Tempe, AZ.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
Various sets of prediction equations for the Actigraph have been developed to estimate<br />
energy expenditure (EE) in youth, but there is no consensus about the best approach. A<br />
set of two 2-regression models (2RM) have been proposed as alternative to traditional<br />
single regression models (1RM), but they have not been directly compared.<br />
PurPOsE: The purpose of this study was to compare the VM (VM2RM) and VA<br />
(VA2RM) and 1RM models from Freedson/Trost (FT), Trost (TR), Puyau (PU) and<br />
Treuth (TH) to indirect calorimetry for estimating EE in youth.<br />
METhOds: Fifty nine participants (7- 13 yrs; male: 41) performed 12 different<br />
activities (randomly assigned from a set of 24) that would mimic “free-living”<br />
activities in youth. While performing these activities, the participants were<br />
concurrently measured with a metabolic gas analyzer (Oxycon Mobile; OM) and an<br />
Actigraph accelerometer. Each activity was performed for 5-min, with a 1-min rest<br />
between activities. Estimates of METs were obtained from the ActiGraph prediction<br />
methods and were compared to OM measured METs (measured VO2/predicted<br />
RMR). Comparisons were first made using the aggregated data from the whole trial<br />
(i.e. between-subject comparisons; n = 59) and then for each individual activity (i.e.<br />
activity-by-activity comparisons; n=24). Agreement with OM values was evaluated<br />
using repeated measures of ANOVA (with Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparisons), and<br />
absolute percent errors (APE).<br />
rEsuLTs: For the whole trial comparisons, estimated EE from each of the ActiGraph<br />
prediction methods significantly underestimated measured OM EE (P