Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD was detected: UPDRS-III 21.1 ± 3.5 vs. 14.1 ± 3.5, p
<strong>Thursday</strong>, May 30, 2013 S298 Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement 1529 Board #121 May 30, 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Examination of sustained Gait speed in Individuals with Chronic stroke Tracy A. Dierks1 , Peter A. Altenburger1 , Kristine K. Miller2 , Rebecca L. Phipps3 , Arlene A. Schmid2 . 1Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN. 2Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN. 3Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN. (Sponsor: Stuart J. Warden, FACSM) (No relationships reported) While improvements in gait speed are commonly achieved following therapy for individuals with stroke, many in the chronic stages still experience gait deficits, causing declines in community ambulation. This may be associated with an inability to sustain gait speed for an extended period of walking, yet little is known regarding gait speed sustainability. PurPOsE: To determine if individuals with chronic stroke have the ability to sustain gait speed for 6 minutes of walking. METhOds: Forty-five individuals with chronic stroke completed a 10 meter walk test (10MWT) and 6 minute walk test (6MWT) over a gait mat. For the 10MWT, subjects walked at the fastest pace possible that felt safe. For the 6MWT, subjects walked at a comfortable pace for 6 minutes while traversing a 30-meter walkway, allowing for multiple passes over the gait mat. Gait speed sustainability was measured as the difference between the peak speed during the 6MWT and the speed at the end. rEsuLTs: The 6MWT peak speed (0.89 m/s ±0.38) was significantly slower than the 10MWT speed (1.06 m/s ±0.51), suggesting subjects were capable of selecting a fast pace versus one for extended walking. Yet, there was a significant gait speed reduction of 0.07 m/s (±0.09) from peak to end (0.82 m/s ±0.36) during the 6MWT, indicating an inability to sustain speed. These findings were most evident in Unlimited Community Ambulators (CA) (10MWT 1.38 m/s; 6MWT peak 1.15, end 1.07), followed by Limited CA (10MWT 0.71 m/s; 6MWT peak 0.61, end 0.55), while Household Ambulators showed no differences (10MWT 0.34 m/s; 6MWT peak 0.30, end 0.28). The total distance walked during the 6MWT (277.7 m ±135.5) was significantly less than the estimated distance (320.9 m ±138.2) based on peak speed. Subjects also displayed a significant increase in Rating of Perceived Exertion at the end (8 ±3 to 12 ±4) of the 6MWT. These indicate that the declining gait speed occurred with increased exertion and a reduction in total distance walked. CONCLusION: Individuals with chronic stroke could not sustain their gait speed for extended walking, which was associated with increased exertion and a reduction in estimated total distance walked. As these differences were primarily observed in Unlimited and Limited CA subgroups, community ambulation potential might be incomplete without assessing gait speed sustainability. 1530 Board #122 May 30, 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Investigating The Walking ability Of Patients With Parkinson’s disease Via Non-motorized Treadmills Han-Wen Chang1 , Wen-Hsu Sung1 , Tien-Yow Chuang2 . 1 2 National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. (No relationships reported) Decreased walking ability of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) may result in the limitations of activity of daily living. Non-motorized treadmills (NMTs) can provide active walking training. Subjects need to exert force from lower limbs to drive the belt forward to walk on it. Currently there are still few studies on the application of NMTs, especially on patients with PD. PurPOsE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the walking ability of patients with PD and to compare the walking ability between healthy adults and the patients with PD via NMTs. METhOd: Six healthy adults (group A) and six patients with PD (group B) were recruited. Group B was assessed during on-period (in 2 hours after taking medicine). Subjects were asked to walk on the NMT at self-paced speed and at as fast as possible speed for 1 minute respectively. We acquired the data of walking velocity, cadence, step length, and ground reaction force (GRF, which was normalized to body weight and conveyed to %BW). Independent sample t-test was used to analyze the data. Statistical significance was set at level of 0.05. rEsuLT: The mean age (y/o) (70.83±3.60 vs. 72.08±5.55; p=.654), height (cm) (161.33±11.27 vs. 161.83±8.86; p=.934), and weight (kgw) (61.67 ±11.48 vs. 68.67±11.22; p=.311) between two groups were shown no significant difference. At self-paced speed, parameters of group A & group B: walking velocity (m/sec) is 0.58±0.13 vs. 0.47±0.25 (p=.395); cadence (step/min) is 98.00±18.85 vs.100.50±18.76 (p=.823); step length (m) is 0.36±0.10 vs. 0.28±0.10 (p=.185); GRF (%BW) is 1.16±0.36 vs. 1.02±0.03 (p=.381). At fast speed, parameters of the two groups: walking velocity (m/sec) is 0.86±0.12 vs. 0.60±0.31 (p=.101); cadence (step/min) is 122.00±17.66 vs. 124.50±20.50 (p=.826); step length (m) is 0.43±0.11 vs. 0.29±0.12 (p=.054); GRF (%BW) is 1.16±0.34 vs. 1.03±0.02 (p=.401). There was no significant difference in these parameters between two groups. CONCLusION: The parameters revealed no significant difference between groups. However, the walking velocity of group B was slower than group A (self-paced MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE ® speed & as fast as possible speed: 82.32% & 69.50% respectively); step length was decreased (76.85% & 65.77% resp.); GRF is decreased (87.94% & 88.91% resp.). Our preliminary results may be a reference for the further NMT training on patients with PD. 1531 Board #123 May 30, 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Validity of handgrip Exercise to study Vascular Function in Parkinson’s disease Kylene Peroutky, Brandon Pollock, Keith Burns, John McDaniel, Angela Ridgel. Kent State University, Kent, OH. (Sponsor: Ellen L Glickman, FACSM) (No relationships reported) BaCKGrOuNd: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system characterized by symptoms of motor dysfunction including tremors, impaired gait, and rigidity. Although autonomic dysfunction impairs the regulation of the cardiovascular system and oxidative stress may be associated with peripheral vascular dysfunction in this population, blood flow limitations during exercise and the extent of vascular dysfunction has yet to be established. Although handgrip exercise is a common modality used to evaluate blood flow and vascular function during exercise, the impaired motor control of this population may prevent from being a valid testing modality. PUPROSE: This study was used to validate whether the PD group was capable of performing consistent handgrip contractions over a prolonged duration and across various intensities. METhOds: Ten volunteers, 5 with PD and 5 controls matched for age performed a four stage handgrip protocol. Each participant was instructed to squeeze a handgrip dynamometer once per second for 3 minutes at 4 different intensities (30, 60, 90, and 120 N). The subjects had real-time visual feedback of the force tracings during the entire protocol as well as a horizontal guideline which represented the target force. rEsuLTs: Statistical analysis indicated that across the entire protocol there was no difference in the percentage of contractions between the control (63.3±7.8%) and PD (69.7±9.9%) groups that were within 10% of the target force. There was also no statistical significance in the absolute error between the control (3.6±1.4 N, 5.6±0.84 N, 7.7±0.90 N, 10.8±3.4 N) and PD (2.9±0.79 N, 5.3±1.03 N, 7.2±1.5 N, 8.2±1.3 N) groups for the 4 levels of increasing intensity, respectively. In addition, although the duration of the contraction increased from Stage 1 to Stage 4 for both groups (approximately 298 ms to 534 ms) there was no statistical difference between the healthy controls and PD. CONCLusION: The results of this study indicate that the PD patients are capable of performing the handgrip exercise to the same aptitude as the control group. This suggests that the handgrip protocol is a valid method that can be used to evaluate vascular health and blood flow in PD patients compared to controls. 1532 Board #124 May 30, 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Loading asymmetry during the sit to stand in People with Multiples sclerosis Bradley J. Bowser 1 , Cathleen N. Brown 2 , Lesley J. White, FACSM 2 , Simpson J. Simpson, FACSM 2 . 1 South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD. 2 University of Georgia, Athens, GA. (No relationships reported) Mediolateral (ML) postural instability for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is largely influenced by interlimb loading asymmetries. During quiet standing, people with MS favor their stronger limb by shifting their center of pressure towards the stronger leg side and simultaneously increasing the vertical ground reaction forces (GRF) to that leg. While ML postural stability and loading asymmetries have been examined during quiet standing, no research has examined these two variables during a sit to stand (STS) movement. PurPOsE: To compare ML stability and loading asymmetry between MS and non- MS persons during a STS movement. METhOds: Participants were divided into three groups: an MS group with leg weakness, less than 1.4 BW on 1RM leg press (MS-LW; n = 10; 49 ± 10 yr), an MS group with comparable strength to controls, greater than 1.4 BW on 1RM leg press (MS-CS; n = 11; 40 ± 12 yr), and a non-MS control group (CON; n = 12; 43 ± 12 yr). GRFs were captured bilaterally during five STS trials. ANOVAs followed by post-hoc testing (α = 0.05) were used to determine group differences for the variables of interest displayed in Table 1. rEsuLTs: Significant group differences for 1RM leg press, RLA, and ML stability were revealed (Table 1). Post-hoc comparisons indicate lower 1RM leg press and increased ML instability for MS-LW compared to both CON and MS-CS (Table 1). RLA was also higher in MS-LW compared to CON (Table 1). CONCLusION: During the STS, persons with MS who have leg weakness display greater ML instability that is likely due to greater vertical loading occurring on the dominant/stronger limb. MS training protocols that emphasize both strength and symmetry training may be needed in order to improve ML stability during dynamic movements such as the STS. ACSM May 28 - June 1, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana
- Page 1 and 2:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S176 Vol. 45
- Page 3 and 4:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S178 Vol. 45
- Page 5 and 6:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S180 Vol. 45
- Page 7 and 8:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S182 Vol. 45
- Page 9 and 10:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S184 Vol. 45
- Page 11 and 12:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S186 Vol. 45
- Page 13 and 14:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S188 Vol. 45
- Page 15 and 16:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S190 Vol. 45
- Page 17 and 18:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S192 Vol. 45
- Page 19 and 20:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S194 Vol. 45
- Page 21 and 22:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S196 Vol. 45
- Page 23 and 24:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S198 Vol. 45
- Page 25 and 26:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S200 Vol. 45
- Page 27 and 28:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S202 Vol. 45
- Page 29 and 30:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S204 Vol. 45
- Page 31 and 32:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S206 Vol. 45
- Page 33 and 34:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S208 Vol. 45
- Page 35 and 36:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S210 Vol. 45
- Page 37 and 38:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S212 Vol. 45
- Page 39 and 40:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S214 Vol. 45
- Page 41 and 42:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S216 Vol. 45
- Page 43 and 44:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S218 Vol. 45
- Page 45 and 46:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S220 Vol. 45
- Page 47 and 48:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S222 Vol. 45
- Page 49 and 50:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S224 Vol. 45
- Page 51 and 52:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S226 Vol. 45
- Page 53 and 54:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S228 Vol. 45
- Page 55 and 56:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S230 Vol. 45
- Page 57 and 58:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S232 Vol. 45
- Page 59 and 60:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S234 Vol. 45
- Page 61 and 62:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S236 Vol. 45
- Page 63 and 64:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S238 Vol. 45
- Page 65 and 66:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S240 Vol. 45
- Page 67 and 68:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S242 Vol. 45
- Page 69 and 70:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S244 Vol. 45
- Page 71 and 72: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S246 Vol. 45
- Page 73 and 74: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S248 Vol. 45
- Page 75 and 76: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S250 Vol. 45
- Page 77 and 78: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S252 Vol. 45
- Page 79 and 80: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S254 Vol. 45
- Page 81 and 82: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S256 Vol. 45
- Page 83 and 84: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S258 Vol. 45
- Page 85 and 86: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S260 Vol. 45
- Page 87 and 88: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S262 Vol. 45
- Page 89 and 90: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S264 Vol. 45
- Page 91 and 92: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S266 Vol. 45
- Page 93 and 94: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S268 Vol. 45
- Page 95 and 96: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S270 Vol. 45
- Page 97 and 98: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S272 Vol. 45
- Page 99 and 100: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S274 Vol. 45
- Page 101 and 102: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S276 Vol. 45
- Page 103 and 104: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S278 Vol. 45
- Page 105 and 106: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S280 Vol. 45
- Page 107 and 108: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S282 Vol. 45
- Page 109 and 110: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S284 Vol. 45
- Page 111 and 112: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S286 Vol. 45
- Page 113 and 114: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S288 Vol. 45
- Page 115 and 116: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S290 Vol. 45
- Page 117 and 118: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S292 Vol. 45
- Page 119 and 120: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S294 Vol. 45
- Page 121: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S296 Vol. 45
- Page 125 and 126: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S300 Vol. 45
- Page 127 and 128: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S302 Vol. 45
- Page 129 and 130: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S304 Vol. 45
- Page 131 and 132: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S306 Vol. 45
- Page 133 and 134: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S308 Vol. 45
- Page 135 and 136: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S310 Vol. 45
- Page 137 and 138: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S312 Vol. 45
- Page 139 and 140: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S314 Vol. 45
- Page 141 and 142: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S316 Vol. 45
- Page 143 and 144: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S318 Vol. 45
- Page 145 and 146: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S320 Vol. 45
- Page 147 and 148: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S322 Vol. 45
- Page 149 and 150: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S324 Vol. 45
- Page 151 and 152: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S326 Vol. 45
- Page 153 and 154: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S328 Vol. 45
- Page 155 and 156: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S330 Vol. 45
- Page 157 and 158: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S332 Vol. 45
- Page 159 and 160: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S334 Vol. 45
- Page 161 and 162: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S336 Vol. 45
- Page 163 and 164: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S338 Vol. 45
- Page 165 and 166: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S340 Vol. 45
- Page 167 and 168: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S342 Vol. 45
- Page 169 and 170: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S344 Vol. 45
- Page 171 and 172: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S346 Vol. 45
- Page 173 and 174:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S348 Vol. 45
- Page 175 and 176:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S350 Vol. 45
- Page 177 and 178:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S352 Vol. 45