Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine 10=worst pain), secondary outcome parameters were oDASH score [0=no impairment, 100=severe impairment] oGrip strength (JAMAR) [kg] in 0° and 90° elbow flexion oVibration using 128 Hz tuning fork ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01269879. rEsuLTs: •Pain was reduced in the vibration training only group (A) from 3.6±2.0 to 2.4±2.0 (p=0.019) and in the combination group (Flexi-Bar + XCO-Trainer) from 3.6±2.3 to 2.1±1.8 (p=0.002) oThere was no intergroup difference in terms of pain reduction superiority (figure 1) •DASH: Improvement in both groups (A: 30±13 to 14±12, p=0.001; B: 26±13 to 12±11, p=0.001, no intergroup differences) •Grip strength: significant improvement in 0° elbow flexion in both groups •128 Hz tuning fork: Improvement in both groups (A: 6.1 to 6.3, B: 6.1±0.8 to 6.4±0.6, both p
<strong>Thursday</strong>, May 30, 2013 S250 Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement 1286 Board #232 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM heterogeneous Mechanomyographic activity of Wrist Extensors in response to Eccentric Exercise Afshin Samani1 , Ernst A. Hansen1 , Adam Kawczynski2 , Pascal Madeleine1 . 1Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 2University School of Physical Education, Wroclaw, Poland. (No relationships reported) The mechanomyography (MMG) signal furnishes information on the intrinsic muscle mechanical activity. Heterogeneous MMG activity has been reported for erector spinae and trapezius muscle during sustained contraction but no studies have investigated the effects of high intensity eccentric exercise on the spatio-temporal MMG activity. PurPOsE: To investigate spatio-temporal MMG activity of wrist extensor muscles before and after eccentric exercise in healthy subjects. METhOds: Twelve volunteers performed one bout of repeated eccentric exercise at high intensity involving wrist extensors of the dominant arm. MMG signals from wrist extensors were detected by means of accelerometers placed over 12 points forming a 3×4 grid. MMG recordings were made during standardized wrist isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions performed before, immediately after and 24 hours after eccentric exercise. Root mean square (RMS) and percentage of determinism (%DET) of the MMG signals were computed to estimate the level muscular activation and the amount of regularity of the MMG signals. RMS and %DET were used as markers of neuromuscular changes due to fatigue and delayed onset muscle soreness. rEsuLTs: Muscle strength decreased by 14% and soreness intensity was 4.1 ± 0.8 cm (mean ± SEM) 24 hours after eccentric exercise. There was a significant increase in RMS immediately after and 24 hours after compared with before eccentric exercise, respectively 23.8 and 15.5 vs. 13.3 ± 0.3 mm/s-2 (P < 0.05). The %DET was higher at 24 hours after compared with before and immediately after eccentric exercise, respectively 96.7 vs. 95.8 and 96.0 ± 0.1 % (P < 0.05). The RMS and %DET depended on the accelerometer locations (P < 0.001) with higher RMS values (25 %) and lower %DET (1.4 %) on extensor digitorum communis compared with extensor carpi radialis ulnaris. CONCLusIONs: These present study depicted neuromuscular changes exemplified by increase MMG activity and regularity in MMG signals in presence of delayed onset muscle soreness. Inhomogeneous MMG activity in wrist extensors muscles was also found confirming the importance of using multiple recording sites when assessing muscle MMG activity. Supported by GigtForeningen R77-A1202 and Danish Ministry of Culture Committee on Sports Research grants. 1287 Board #233 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM Comparison of Electromyographic activity of Muscles associated with Elbow Flexion using different resistance devices Melissa Humphres, Cole Sillaman, Craig Parker, Christine Rettig, Peter Jordan, Patrick Sells. Belmont University, Nashville, TN. (No relationships reported) BaCKGrOuNd: Research has demonstrated that forces exerted on muscles when using different resistance devices significantly affect how the muscles respond and develop. Moreover, exercise performed in stable environments will isolate and recruit individual muscles to achieve a desired motion, while exercise in unstable environments will globally recruit groups of muscles to achieve the same motion. Researchers of this study were looking to combine these two notions to determine if a potentially stable device would elicit more muscle activity within an individual muscle, and if a potentially unstable device would require recruitment of additional muscles. The newly designed HaloBell is designed to distribute its weight evenly in all planes providing a potentially stable device, and the dumbbell distributes its weight to the poles of the device in a single plane providing a potentially more unstable device. PurPOsE: The purpose of this study is to determine if different resistance devices, the traditional dumbbell and the HaloBell, yield different levels of muscle activity in the elbow flexors during a standard biceps curl. METhOds: EMG activity was collected from 33 healthy participants that completed a MVIC in three positions. After randomizing the trials, subjects underwent four sets of three repetitions of elbow flexion in order to use each device in midposition and supination. Data was analyzed using a 3x2x2 ANOVA. rEsuLTs: A significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between devices with the forearm in midposition (p = 0.033) for the biceps brachii; the HaloBell was found to elicit less EMG activity (48% of MVIC) than the traditional dumbbell (50% of MVIC). The data did not produce any significant differences between devices with any other combinations examined. CONCLusION: The overall findings were not pronounced, and inferences that can be made from the data are limited. It cannot be concluded that the HaloBell is able to definitively elicit a greater EMG activity in target muscles compared to the traditional dumbbell. However, EMG activity was similar between the two devices suggesting similar efficacy. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE ® 1288 Board #234 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM shoulder Joint reaction Forces during Wheelchair Propulsion With arms and arm-legs By The Elderly Xiang Ke 1 , Yaping Zhong 2 , Peng Liu 2 , Yong Tai Wang, FACSM 3 . 1 Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. 2 Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China. 3 Shandong Sport University and Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. (No relationships reported) PurPOsE: This study was to investigate the difference of SJRFs between wheelchair propulsion with arms (AP) and with combination of arms and legs (ALP) in the elderly. METhOds: Fourteen subjects aged 65 to 90 years old were recruited from local assisted living facilities, with five in AP group and nine in ALP group. Each subject performed two wheelchair locomotive activities (moving straight or along a curved line) at self-comfortable speed, using three different types of wheelchairs (drive-axis positioned in the front, middle, or rear). A Qualisys motion analysis system was employed to record and analyzed 3-D kinematical data from the land-markers of the right shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee and ankle, and 5 th metacarpal joints. A JR3 force measurement system built in the drive-axis was used to record 3-D right hand contact reaction forces from the pushrim. Peak SJRFs were predicted by an inverse dynamic model. The differences of SJFRs between two groups across two locomotive activities and three wheelchair types were determined by a three-way ANOVA, and the differences between two groups, in straight or curved locomotive activities with the same wheelchair type were compared by an Independent T test. rEsuLTs: SJFRs between AP group and ALP group across wheelchair activities and types were 78.5±7.9 N and 74.9±5.9 N (p=.716) and no differences were identified between the two groups across wheelchair activities and types, except for the interaction of three factors (group, wheelchair activity and type) together. In the straight wheelchair activity, there were no significant differences between AP and ALP groups with neither middle nor rear drive-axis wheelchairs (82.9±49.6 vs 48.3±11.6N, p=.195; 66.4±20.2 vs 50.0±14.1N, p=.098, respectively), but a significant difference was founded when propelling with front drive-axis wheelchair (55.2±14.7 vs 126.9±63.1 N, p=.009). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the curved activity with respect to the front, or middle, or rear drive-axis wheelchair (67.2±27.3 vs 55.2±14.1N, p=.291; 75.9±37.5 vs 81.1±45.3N, p=.833; 123.6±97.6 vs 88.2±53.3N, p=.484, correspondingly). CONCLusIONs: The involvement of legs with arms may not effectively facilitate reduction of SJFR for the elderly during wheelchair propulsion. 1289 Board #235 May 30, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM does Mode of Wheelchair Propulsion Influence Interlimb Wrist Coordination? Mark D. Tillman, FACSM, Patty Hovis, Lisa A. Zukowski, Jaimie A. Roper, Dana M. Otzel, Orit Shechtman, Ryan Roemmich. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL. (No relationships reported) Individuals who use manual wheelchairs for mobility have increased risk of upper extremity pain that can lead to loss of mobility and decreased quality of life. In fact, 49 to 63% of conventional manual wheelchair (CMW) users suffer from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Our recent work has revealed that use of an ergonomic hand drive (EHD) mechanism for propulsion improves utilizes more neutral wrist orientation. In addition, other researchers have indicated that interlimb coordination is constrained (and potentially harmful) in CMW users with shoulder pain. Similar effects may occur at the wrist when using different propulsion techniques and have not been investigated. PurPOsE: To evaluate interlimb coordination of the wrist via cross-correlation coefficients (CCC) in relation to angular movements while using an EHD mechanism and a CMW. METhOds: Fourteen full-time CMW users (41.4±15.9 yrs, 73.4±16.7 kg, and 172.3±12.9 cm) participated in the study. Motion data were captured by 11 cameras as participants propelled across a length of 8m completing 5 trials in a CMW and 5 trials in the same CMW fitted with the EHD. Angular kinematics and CCC of the wrist (flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation) were calculated with the understanding that lower values would indicate reduced symmetry and constraint. At least one push phase was analyzed per trial and all trials were combined to calculate an average push per participant. CCC from the two propulsion styles were compared using paired samples t-tests (α=0.05). rEsuLTs: Use of the EHDM resulted in reduced flexion/extension CCC compared to CMW (0.509 and 0.908, respectively; p=0.012). Radial/ulnar deviation CCC did not vary between propulsion techniques (p>0.05). CONCLusION: EHD use resulted in reduced interlimb coordination regarding wrist flexion/extension. These results indicate that EHD employment may ease constraints on wrist flexion and extension during wheeling. The observed differences in coordination/symmetry may have clinical implications regarding overuse injuries of the wrist including CTS. This work supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Institute Pilot & Collaborative Research Projects (NIH: UL1 RR02980). The EHD is the intellectual property of Shands Healthcare. ACSM May 28 - June 1, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana
- Page 1 and 2:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S176 Vol. 45
- Page 3 and 4:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S178 Vol. 45
- Page 5 and 6:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S180 Vol. 45
- Page 7 and 8:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S182 Vol. 45
- Page 9 and 10:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S184 Vol. 45
- Page 11 and 12:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S186 Vol. 45
- Page 13 and 14:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S188 Vol. 45
- Page 15 and 16:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S190 Vol. 45
- Page 17 and 18:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S192 Vol. 45
- Page 19 and 20:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S194 Vol. 45
- Page 21 and 22:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S196 Vol. 45
- Page 23 and 24: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S198 Vol. 45
- Page 25 and 26: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S200 Vol. 45
- Page 27 and 28: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S202 Vol. 45
- Page 29 and 30: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S204 Vol. 45
- Page 31 and 32: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S206 Vol. 45
- Page 33 and 34: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S208 Vol. 45
- Page 35 and 36: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S210 Vol. 45
- Page 37 and 38: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S212 Vol. 45
- Page 39 and 40: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S214 Vol. 45
- Page 41 and 42: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S216 Vol. 45
- Page 43 and 44: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S218 Vol. 45
- Page 45 and 46: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S220 Vol. 45
- Page 47 and 48: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S222 Vol. 45
- Page 49 and 50: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S224 Vol. 45
- Page 51 and 52: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S226 Vol. 45
- Page 53 and 54: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S228 Vol. 45
- Page 55 and 56: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S230 Vol. 45
- Page 57 and 58: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S232 Vol. 45
- Page 59 and 60: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S234 Vol. 45
- Page 61 and 62: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S236 Vol. 45
- Page 63 and 64: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S238 Vol. 45
- Page 65 and 66: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S240 Vol. 45
- Page 67 and 68: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S242 Vol. 45
- Page 69 and 70: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S244 Vol. 45
- Page 71 and 72: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S246 Vol. 45
- Page 73: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S248 Vol. 45
- Page 77 and 78: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S252 Vol. 45
- Page 79 and 80: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S254 Vol. 45
- Page 81 and 82: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S256 Vol. 45
- Page 83 and 84: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S258 Vol. 45
- Page 85 and 86: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S260 Vol. 45
- Page 87 and 88: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S262 Vol. 45
- Page 89 and 90: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S264 Vol. 45
- Page 91 and 92: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S266 Vol. 45
- Page 93 and 94: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S268 Vol. 45
- Page 95 and 96: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S270 Vol. 45
- Page 97 and 98: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S272 Vol. 45
- Page 99 and 100: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S274 Vol. 45
- Page 101 and 102: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S276 Vol. 45
- Page 103 and 104: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S278 Vol. 45
- Page 105 and 106: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S280 Vol. 45
- Page 107 and 108: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S282 Vol. 45
- Page 109 and 110: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S284 Vol. 45
- Page 111 and 112: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S286 Vol. 45
- Page 113 and 114: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S288 Vol. 45
- Page 115 and 116: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S290 Vol. 45
- Page 117 and 118: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S292 Vol. 45
- Page 119 and 120: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S294 Vol. 45
- Page 121 and 122: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S296 Vol. 45
- Page 123 and 124: Thursday, May 30, 2013 S298 Vol. 45
- Page 125 and 126:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S300 Vol. 45
- Page 127 and 128:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S302 Vol. 45
- Page 129 and 130:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S304 Vol. 45
- Page 131 and 132:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S306 Vol. 45
- Page 133 and 134:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S308 Vol. 45
- Page 135 and 136:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S310 Vol. 45
- Page 137 and 138:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S312 Vol. 45
- Page 139 and 140:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S314 Vol. 45
- Page 141 and 142:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S316 Vol. 45
- Page 143 and 144:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S318 Vol. 45
- Page 145 and 146:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S320 Vol. 45
- Page 147 and 148:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S322 Vol. 45
- Page 149 and 150:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S324 Vol. 45
- Page 151 and 152:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S326 Vol. 45
- Page 153 and 154:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S328 Vol. 45
- Page 155 and 156:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S330 Vol. 45
- Page 157 and 158:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S332 Vol. 45
- Page 159 and 160:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S334 Vol. 45
- Page 161 and 162:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S336 Vol. 45
- Page 163 and 164:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S338 Vol. 45
- Page 165 and 166:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S340 Vol. 45
- Page 167 and 168:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S342 Vol. 45
- Page 169 and 170:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S344 Vol. 45
- Page 171 and 172:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S346 Vol. 45
- Page 173 and 174:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S348 Vol. 45
- Page 175 and 176:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S350 Vol. 45
- Page 177 and 178:
Thursday, May 30, 2013 S352 Vol. 45