Thursday-Abstracts
Thursday-Abstracts
Thursday-Abstracts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Thursday</strong>, May 30, 2013<br />
S316 Vol. 45 No. 5 Supplement<br />
1601 Board #193 May 30, 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM<br />
Parkinson’s disease Patients Tolerate Multifaceted Exercise<br />
Intervention While Improving health-related Physical<br />
Fitness<br />
Corey A. Peacock1 , Kayla A. Wilson2 , Gabriel J. Sanders3 , Duane<br />
B. Corbett2 , Emily J. Fickes-Ryan4 , Ellen L. Glickman, FACSM2 ,<br />
Angela L. Ridgel2 . 1Nova Southeastern University, Fort<br />
Lauderdale, FL. 2Kent State University, Kent, OH. 3Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY. 4West Virginia<br />
Univesity, Morgantown, WV.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder ensuing impaired<br />
physical fitness and neuromuscular function. Multiple studies have demonstrated<br />
physical improvements associated with either aerobic exercise or anaerobic exercise.<br />
However, little research exists demonstrating the effects of an exercise program<br />
combining both.<br />
PurPOsE: To determine if PD patients can tolerate sessions of combined anaerobic<br />
and aerobic training over the course of an eight week intervention.<br />
METhOds: 13 PD patients completed the preliminary 24-session, cohesive<br />
anaerobic and aerobic exercise protocol fixed over an eight week period. Our protocol<br />
consisted of 30 min bouts of aerobic cycle ergometry at an active-assisted pace of<br />
85 RPM. In addition, participants completed 40 min of anaerobic resistance training<br />
(55-67% of their 1-RM for sets ranging between 12-15 repetitions), balance training,<br />
and flexibility training. As accepted by the ACSM, we collected pre- and post- healthrelated<br />
physical fitness data including cardiovascular health (modified YMCA 3-min<br />
step test), muscular strength (1-RM chest press), muscular endurance (curl-up test),<br />
and flexibility (sit-n-reach).<br />
rEsuLTs: Repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated a significant (p ≤<br />
0.002) improvement in cardiovascular health (102 beats·min-1 pre, 94 beats·min-1<br />
post), muscular strength (61.5±30.9 lbs. pre, 83.2±38.5 lbs. post), muscular endurance<br />
(22 reps. pre, 34 reps. post), and flexibility (9.0±2.3 in. pre, 10.5±3.1 in. post).<br />
CONCLusION: Our preliminary multi-facet intervention program demonstrated<br />
both tolerance and health-related physical fitness improvements in PD patients. Further<br />
research needs to be explored observing neurological changes from this tolerated<br />
intervention.<br />
1602 Board #194 May 30, 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM<br />
resistive Breathing Effects On Pulmonary Function, aerobic<br />
Capacity and Medication usage In adult asthmatics<br />
Ina Shaw 1 , Brandon S. Shaw 2 , Gregory A. Brown, FACSM 3 .<br />
1 Monash South Africa and Tshwane University of Technology,<br />
Johannesburg, South Africa. 2 Tshwane University of Technology,<br />
Pretoria, South Africa. 3 University of Nebraska at Kearney,<br />
Kearney, NE.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
The number of individuals with asthma continues to grow. In the United States of<br />
America, 1 in 12 individuals (about 25 million, or 8% of the U.S. population) had<br />
asthma in 2009, compared with 1 in 14 (about 20 million, or 7%) in 2001. Resistive<br />
breathing is a non-pharmacological treatment for asthma that is attractive both<br />
financially and as a more holistic approach to managing a chronic condition.<br />
PurPOsE: The purpose was to determine the effects of resistive breathing on<br />
pulmonary function, aerobic capacity and medication usage in adults with asthma.<br />
METhOds: Sedentary asthmatics were assigned to either a non-exercising control<br />
group (n = 22) or eight-week resistive breathing group (n = 22). Following five<br />
minutes of easy walking and eight minutes of stretching, resistive breathing group<br />
participants inspired and expired maximally in the semi-recumbent position through<br />
a tube 10cm in length and 1cm in diameter. Participants performed these breathing<br />
exercises for three sets of five to 10 repetitions at a 1:2 second inspiration to expiration<br />
ratio, three sets of 10 to 15 repetitions at a 2:4 ratio and three sets of 15 to 20<br />
repetitions at a 3:6 ratio.<br />
rEsuLTs: Eight weeks of resistive breathing significantly (p≤0.05) increased forced<br />
vital capacity (FVC) (3.01±0.58 L vs. 3.52±0.74; p=0.000), forced expiratory volume<br />
in one second (FEV1) (2.85±0.57 L vs. 3.22±0.63 L; p=0.000), peak expiratory<br />
flow (PEF) (7.1±1.57 L.sec-1 vs. 7.68±1.26 L.sec-1; p=0.008) and FEV1/FVC%<br />
(94.86±4.94% vs. 90.64±6.67%; p=0.003), while significantly decreasing medication<br />
usage, but not FEF-25 (2.51±0.87 L.sec-1 vs. 2.19±0.63 L.sec-1; p=0.067), FEF-50<br />
(4.51±1.23 L.sec-1 vs. 4.32±1.16 L.sec-1; p=0.431), FEF-75 (6.39±1.56 L.sec-1 vs.<br />
6.72±1.50 L.sec-1; p=0.175), FEF 25-75 (4.07±1.13 L.sec-1 vs. 3.87±1.04 L.sec-1;<br />
p=0.308), MVV (107.43±34.65 L.min-1 vs. 109.62±38.91 L.min-1; p=0.701) and<br />
aerobic capacity (38.45±8.45 mL.kg-1.min-1 vs. 38.76±7.57 mL.kg-1.min-1; p=0.702).<br />
CONCLusION: These findings suggest that resistive breathing training has some<br />
success at improving pulmonary function and reducing medication usage in adults with<br />
asthma, but does not increase aerobic capacity.<br />
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE ®<br />
1603 Board #195 May 30, 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM<br />
Influence Of aerobic Exercise On Non-exercise Physical<br />
activity: Midwest Exercise Trial-2 (MET-2)<br />
Erik A. Willis1 , Stephen D. Herrmann1 , Jeffrey J. Honas1 ,<br />
Jaehoon Lee2 , Richard A. Washburn, FACSM1 , Joseph E.<br />
Donnelly, FACSM1 . 1University of Kansas Medical Center,<br />
Kansas City, KS. 2University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
INTrOduCTION: Compensatory changes in non-exercise physical activity (NEPA)<br />
in response to an aerobic exercise training program may impact weight loss.<br />
PurPOsE: To examine changes in NEPA in response to 2 levels of aerobic exercise<br />
training.<br />
METhOds: Ninety-two overweight/obese (BMI 25-39.9) sedentary young adults<br />
(18-30 yrs.) completed (i.e. ≥ 90% scheduled exercise sessions) a 10-mo. trial of<br />
aerobic exercise (5 days/wk.,70-80% max heart rate, supervised ≥4 days/wk.) at<br />
either 2,000 (n = 37; 19 females) or 3,000 (n = 37; 18 females) kcal/wk. or served as<br />
non-exercise controls (n = 18, 9 females. NEPA was assessed over 7 consecutive days<br />
by accelerometer (ActiGraph Model GT1M) at baseline, 3.5, 7 and 10 mos. Mixed<br />
modeling was used to examine differences between groups (group effect), within<br />
groups (time effect) and group-by-time interaction for NEPA assessed as average<br />
counts/min, and time spent sedentary ( 5999 counts/min) intensity PA.<br />
rEsuLTs: Within the exercise groups (2,000 and 3,000) N=74, there were no<br />
significant effects (all p > 0.05) of group, time, or group- by-time interactions for<br />
NEPA assessed as counts/minute, sedentary time, or time spent in light, moderate or<br />
vigorous intensity PA. However, activity counts/min were significantly higher (p <<br />
0.001) in the 3,000 kcal/wk. group (346±141min.) vs. controls (290±106min.) at 7<br />
mos. and significantly higher (p < 0.001) in both the 3,000 kcal/wk. (345±163min.) and<br />
2,000 kcal/wk. groups (317±146min.) vs. controls (277±116min.) at 10 mos. Although<br />
non-significant, sedentary time increased slightly (+2.3%) in controls and decreased in<br />
both the 2,000 kcal/wk. (-6.2%) and 3,000 kcal/wk. groups (-4.3%).<br />
CONCLusION: A 10-mo. aerobic exercise training program at either 2,000 or 3,000<br />
kcal/wk. was not associated with compensatory changes in NEPA. However, the<br />
observation of significantly higher levels of NEPA (counts/min) and lower sedentary<br />
time in exercisers vs. controls suggest that, contrary to conventional wisdom,<br />
overweight and obese individuals do not become less physically active or spend more<br />
time in sedentary pursuits in response to exercise.<br />
supported by NIh r01 dK49181<br />
1604 Board #196 May 30, 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM<br />
Effect Of Training In Chi-running On running<br />
Biomechanics<br />
Deepak Kumar, Kelly McDermott, Haojun Feng, Veronica<br />
Goldman, Anthony Luke, FACSM, Richard Souza, Frederick M.<br />
Hecht. University of CA San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.<br />
(No relationships reported)<br />
Running injuries are reported by up to 80% of runners. ChiRunning is an approach<br />
to running form that is thought to reduce the rate of injuries through encouraging a<br />
mid-foot strike, forward lean, shorter strides and other variations. No studies report<br />
the effect of ChiRunning training on running biomechanics in individuals without a<br />
current running practice .<br />
PurPOsE: To evaluate kinematic and kinetic patterns before and after training in<br />
ChiRunning .<br />
METhOds: Data were drawn from a randomized pilot study evaluating a running<br />
program for participants with pre-hypertension. The 12-week study had 3 arms: 1)<br />
intervention, group-based training in ChiWalk/Run lead by a certified ChiRunning<br />
coach (n=9); 2) active control, a group-based training in walk/run approach covering<br />
general topics about running (excluding running form) (n=5); 3) usual care, a group<br />
provided with educational materials about adopting a walk/run program (n=6). 3-D<br />
kinematic [over-ground (OG), treadmill] and kinetic (OG) data were collected from all<br />
subjects pre- and post-intervention. At the moment, OG stance phase data have been<br />
analyzed from 7 individuals (Age: 53±8 yr; Weight: 79.3±16.8 kg, M:F= 4:3) in the<br />
chi-running group, compared using paired t-tests.<br />
rEsuLTs: Post-intervention, the subjects had slightly slower running velocity (Pre:<br />
3.1±0.6 m/s, Post: 2.9±0.4 m/s, p = 0.04), greater forward lean (p = 0.04) and less<br />
over-striding (p = 0.02). Other differences included a lower external knee adduction<br />
moment (p = 0.03), greater ankle eversion (p = 0.02) and greater external ankle<br />
eversion moment (p = 0.01). There were trends for a more anterior strike index (9% to<br />
14 % foot length, p = 0.08), lower power generation at the ankle during preswing (p =<br />
0.08), lower power absorption at the knee (p = 0.07), greater knee flexion (p = 0.09),<br />
greater power absorption at the hip (p = 0.08) and shorter sagittal hip excursion (p =<br />
0.06). There were reductions in vertical instantaneous loading rate, vertical average<br />
loading rate and vertical impact loading but the differences did not reach significance.<br />
CONCLusIONs: ChiRunning intervention leads to changes in running<br />
biomechanics, which may lead to lower stress on distal lower extremity joints and<br />
tissues (ankle, tibia, knee) but the impact on proximal joints (hip, lower back) needs<br />
further investigation.<br />
ACSM May 28 - June 1, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana