LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University
LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University
LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
stable arc condition for dip mode metal transfer by automatically adjusting the<br />
welding voltage until stability was achieved. Overall, the technique presented by the<br />
authors [ref. 201] was computationally time consuming; they reported that it takes<br />
about 15 cycles (90 seconds) to obtain a stable welding condition, whereas the<br />
controller developed in this work takes less than 6 seconds (see Section 7.1).<br />
In a similar work, Mita et al. [ref. 200] used the fuzzy logic method to<br />
automatically set the welding voltage in CO2 gas metal arc welding. The fuzzy rules<br />
used were developed from the standard deviation of short circuiting and arcing times<br />
and were distributed into three groups, dependending on the welding current (low<br />
range: 80-200A; medium range: 210-290A; and high range: >300A). This was due to<br />
the fact that the correlation between the stability of the welding arc and the standard<br />
deviation of these parameters becomes poor as the welding current increases<br />
[ref. 37].<br />
In each group, different rules were used for assessing the stability of the welding arc<br />
resulting in a fast but complicated method (for example, 20 fuzzy production rules<br />
were used for the low current range and 25 rules for the medium range). Although<br />
this is a simpler approach to automatically tuning the voltage compared to the work<br />
carried out by Won and Cho [ref. 201], Mita et al. [ref. 200] work was found to use<br />
too many rules. The algorithm presented in this section uses only 17 rules accross the<br />
whole range of welding currents.<br />
4.2.2 Data acquisition and processing<br />
In order to implement the control algorithms presented in section 4.2.1, a<br />
monitoring system was developed for acquiring and digitising the welding current and<br />
voltage transient waveforms and extracting the statistical features from which the<br />
monitoring indices are calculated. The description of the hardware involved can be<br />
found in section 5.3 and the description of the software can be found in Appendix E.<br />
Basically, the monitoring system acquires a fixed number of data points (512)<br />
at a fixed sampling rate (2.5 kHz) for both the welding current and the welding<br />
voltage. The basic statistical features of both signals are extracted using equations<br />
(2.26) to (2.33). Then the monitoring indices are calculated using equations (2.3) to<br />
(2.6) and filtered using a moving average filter, as shown in equation (4.7).<br />
where<br />
Si<br />
Si filtered<br />
Si-I. filtered<br />
a<br />
Sl. iltered - \i - aý Sý -F a' Sý-1 filtered<br />
is the current calculated value of the variable<br />
is the current filtered value of the variable<br />
is the previous filtered value of the variable<br />
smoothing factor (0.3)<br />
This filter is used to reduce the effect of random variation in the monitoring<br />
indices. The filtered values are then applied to the control rules to generate the<br />
required voltage correction.<br />
At the sampling rate used, 2.5 kHz, the acquisition boards take approximately<br />
205 milliseconds to acquire 512 data points. This time was found sufficient to allow<br />
109<br />
(4.7)