18.06.2013 Views

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stable arc condition for dip mode metal transfer by automatically adjusting the<br />

welding voltage until stability was achieved. Overall, the technique presented by the<br />

authors [ref. 201] was computationally time consuming; they reported that it takes<br />

about 15 cycles (90 seconds) to obtain a stable welding condition, whereas the<br />

controller developed in this work takes less than 6 seconds (see Section 7.1).<br />

In a similar work, Mita et al. [ref. 200] used the fuzzy logic method to<br />

automatically set the welding voltage in CO2 gas metal arc welding. The fuzzy rules<br />

used were developed from the standard deviation of short circuiting and arcing times<br />

and were distributed into three groups, dependending on the welding current (low<br />

range: 80-200A; medium range: 210-290A; and high range: >300A). This was due to<br />

the fact that the correlation between the stability of the welding arc and the standard<br />

deviation of these parameters becomes poor as the welding current increases<br />

[ref. 37].<br />

In each group, different rules were used for assessing the stability of the welding arc<br />

resulting in a fast but complicated method (for example, 20 fuzzy production rules<br />

were used for the low current range and 25 rules for the medium range). Although<br />

this is a simpler approach to automatically tuning the voltage compared to the work<br />

carried out by Won and Cho [ref. 201], Mita et al. [ref. 200] work was found to use<br />

too many rules. The algorithm presented in this section uses only 17 rules accross the<br />

whole range of welding currents.<br />

4.2.2 Data acquisition and processing<br />

In order to implement the control algorithms presented in section 4.2.1, a<br />

monitoring system was developed for acquiring and digitising the welding current and<br />

voltage transient waveforms and extracting the statistical features from which the<br />

monitoring indices are calculated. The description of the hardware involved can be<br />

found in section 5.3 and the description of the software can be found in Appendix E.<br />

Basically, the monitoring system acquires a fixed number of data points (512)<br />

at a fixed sampling rate (2.5 kHz) for both the welding current and the welding<br />

voltage. The basic statistical features of both signals are extracted using equations<br />

(2.26) to (2.33). Then the monitoring indices are calculated using equations (2.3) to<br />

(2.6) and filtered using a moving average filter, as shown in equation (4.7).<br />

where<br />

Si<br />

Si filtered<br />

Si-I. filtered<br />

a<br />

Sl. iltered - \i - aý Sý -F a' Sý-1 filtered<br />

is the current calculated value of the variable<br />

is the current filtered value of the variable<br />

is the previous filtered value of the variable<br />

smoothing factor (0.3)<br />

This filter is used to reduce the effect of random variation in the monitoring<br />

indices. The filtered values are then applied to the control rules to generate the<br />

required voltage correction.<br />

At the sampling rate used, 2.5 kHz, the acquisition boards take approximately<br />

205 milliseconds to acquire 512 data points. This time was found sufficient to allow<br />

109<br />

(4.7)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!