18.06.2013 Views

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of error was classified into this group due to its unpredictability, a characteristic that<br />

is also found on the other component error sources.<br />

3.1.2 Welding process errors<br />

The process errors are related to the stability of the process (see section 2.1.5)<br />

and to the adequacy of the welding parameters to produce the required weld quality.<br />

Process errors are mainly characterised by the presence of defects such as undercut,<br />

lack of penetration, porosity and burn-through, and/or the failure to achieve some<br />

required quality specifications (such as the minimum leg length and minimum fusion<br />

penetration), as a result of inadequate choice of welding parameters for the specific<br />

requirements.<br />

It should be noted that positioning errors may induce process errors. For<br />

example, variation in contact tip-to-workpiece distance would result in change in<br />

welding current and fusion penetration while excessive gap in the joint could lead to<br />

overpenetration and burn-through.<br />

3.2 Error compensation and proposed corrective measures<br />

In order to compensate for the errors more effectively, each source of error<br />

should initially be evaluated separately.<br />

3.2.1 Robot error correction<br />

The best way to deal with lack of positioning accuracy of a robot is to perform<br />

a kinematic calibration (see section 2.4.2). In robotic gas metal arc welding, the<br />

velocities during the process are normally low, if compared to spot welding or<br />

machine loading and unloading. Therefore, a static calibration would suffice in this<br />

case. Considering that off-line programming is used and that it is based on a robot<br />

model, a strategy for controlling the robot errors in a robotic arc welding cell is<br />

proposed. This consists of three main actions, namely:<br />

1. To perform an initial static forward calibration in the robot arm after the<br />

installation of the cell;<br />

2. To calibrate the working cell: this includes workpiece positioner and can be<br />

accomplished by using the calibrated robot as a measuring tool. A new<br />

calibration of the work cell is necessary every time its layout is changed;<br />

3. To perform periodic calibration checks in order to correct minor deviations<br />

due to drift error and to detect when a new static calibration is necessary.<br />

Points within the cell could be equipped with measuring devices which would<br />

be responsible for detecting the drift error. These three actions should be repeated for<br />

all robots involved in the production line, thus reducing or eliminating this source of<br />

error.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!