18.06.2013 Views

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3.1 - Ogunbiyi's model coefficients<br />

Regression Coefficients<br />

Variable E . No a S SE R2<br />

'mean (3.1) 61.318 24.053<br />

-0.4611<br />

9.98 97.22<br />

TSI (3.2) 2.8758<br />

-0.002549 -0.060936<br />

0.1237 88.12<br />

Imean (3.3) 0.363842 0.642844<br />

-<br />

12.2015 99.71<br />

VbkVmean (3.4)<br />

-0.47318<br />

0.002481 0.044959 0.09 92.57<br />

Vbk (3.5) -27.3364 -0.039555<br />

2.2558 1.441019 98.62<br />

Leg, (3.6) 1.0 0.561068<br />

-<br />

0.0980 99.58<br />

Leb (3.6) 1.0 0.592637<br />

-<br />

0.129228 99.35<br />

Pen, (3.7) 0.01782<br />

-0.449818 -<br />

0.356612 89.07<br />

Penb (3.7) 0.019058 -0.639698 -<br />

0.415507 82.92<br />

Pr(und) (3.8) -0.0982<br />

0.0044 0.0265 0.3502 65.98<br />

Pr(arc) (3.9) 13.519345 0.97619<br />

-<br />

2.2976 48.61<br />

PR (3.10) -0.9785 -7.0094E-6 0.083019<br />

Obs: *= not available.<br />

The algorithm used for generating welding parameters is an adaptation of the<br />

one proposed by Ogunbiyi [ref. 51]. The algorithm searches for the combinations of<br />

welding parameters that would satisfy a series of constraints relative to bead<br />

geometry, joint position, presence of gap, weld penetration, metal transfer and<br />

stability, and arranges the predicted parameters in order of growing possibility of<br />

producing a weld with defects.<br />

Two main types of constraints are used in the algorithm: a) geometrical<br />

constraints and b) process constraints.<br />

The geometrical constraints refer to the weld geometry limits such as<br />

minimum allowable leg length, maximum allowable leg length, minimum allowable<br />

weld penetration, maximum allowable weld penetration and maximum allowable gap<br />

size. These constraints are normally set relative to the thinner member of the joint and<br />

can vary according to different specifications. The constraints chosen were based on<br />

the Inauxa specification [ref. 190] (see Figure 3.3) and the AWSD8: 8-79 specification<br />

[ref. 107] (see Figure 3.4) and on the validity range of the models [ref. 51]. The<br />

constraints are listed below.<br />

a. 1) Geometrical constraints relative to models validity range (Fillet joints)<br />

" Minimum allowable plate thickness: 1.0 mm<br />

" Maximum allowable plate thickness: 6.0 mm<br />

" Minimum allowable leg length: 2.5 mm<br />

" Maximum allowable leg length: 6.0 nun<br />

" Minimum allowable stand-off: 12 mm<br />

" Maximum allowable stand-off: 20 mm<br />

" Suggested stand-of 15 mm<br />

5 From this point on, the contact tip-to-workpiece distance will be referred to as stand-off<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!