18.06.2013 Views

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Step 4- Calculate the confidence of bad ignition by applying the moving average<br />

filter of equation (4.7) to the possibility measure of process being unstable, Pr(ign),<br />

using a smoothing factor a=0.5<br />

Conf Bad Ign, _ (1- a) " Pr(ign) +a" Conf Baal lgn, _,<br />

Step 5- Estimate a new stand-off value if and only if Conf Bad Ign < 0.2<br />

(4.11)<br />

The value Conf_Bad_Ign = 0.2 was chosen empirically, based on prior<br />

observations of the stand-off model behaviour for different stability levels.<br />

4.2.4 Reliability of process statistical estimates<br />

The model used for estimating the stand-off was obtained from multiple<br />

regression analysis of average values of calculated resistance (see section 6.2). Due to<br />

the nature of the gas metal arc welding process, the welding current and voltage<br />

signals are generally corrupted with random noise which is passed over to the<br />

calculated resistance and, consequently, to the estimated stand-off. In order to reduce<br />

the oscillation in the stand-off values due to the random noise, a third order moving<br />

average filter was used. The filtered stand-off value was then transferred to the table<br />

controller; whereit ould be compared to the required reference stand-off and an<br />

error would be calculated. Equation (4.12) shows the filter used.<br />

"ýOi. Altned<br />

_'2<br />

2 (4.12)<br />

Iaj<br />

"So, U_A<br />

J=O<br />

Daj<br />

j=0<br />

where<br />

SO, filtered current filtered stand-off estimation;<br />

SO(;<br />

_j), e, t non-filtered stand-off estimates for monitoring cycles i, (i-1) and (i-2);<br />

aj<br />

filter weights, aj = 1.0 for j=0,1,2.<br />

Although the filtered values were transferred to the table controller, the stand-<br />

off error predictions were still oscillating. In order to reduce the response of the table<br />

to random variation, threshold limits were imposed on the stand-off error signal, such<br />

that no correction would occur for errors smaller that 0.5 nun and no correction<br />

greater than 1 mm would be applied in a control cycle. A proportional control scheme<br />

with a unitary gain was adopted for adjusting the stand-ofd After sending an<br />

estimated stand-off value to the table controller, the main controller would reset the<br />

stand-off filter and would only send a new estimated value after three estimation<br />

(monitoring) cycles, that is, after acquiring data for producing a filtered stand-off<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!