18.06.2013 Views

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

LIBRARY ı6ıul 0) - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2.1: Joint positioning tolerances for robotic arc welding [ref 108]<br />

Weld Size I Positioning tolerance<br />

Up to 3.18 mm (0.125 in) ±0.38 mm<br />

(±0.015 in)<br />

3.2 to 6.35 mm (0.126 to 0.250 in) ±0.64 nun (±0.025 in)<br />

Above 6.35 mm (0.250 in) ±1.14 mm (±0.045 in)<br />

Kurkin and Drikker [ref. 109] investigated the effect of several geometrical<br />

factors on the permissible weld path deviation for 4 mm sheet steel in T joints, when<br />

using CO2 and other gas mixtures. From the experimental results, the authors reached<br />

the following conclusions:<br />

" the allowable joint deviation relative to the robot path (see Figure 2.16) is<br />

increased by increasing the weld leg length, as a result of reducing the<br />

welding speed;<br />

" the positioning tolerances increase when using downhill welding;<br />

" transverse oscillations increase positioning tolerances, but reduce the<br />

allowable gap. They may also lead to undercutting and lack of fusion<br />

defects in sheet metal welding.<br />

Wadsworth [ref. 110] investigated the effects of welding electrode<br />

misalignment relative to the joint centreline on the weld quality, for different transfer<br />

modes and welding speeds. The author observed that, for globular mode of metal<br />

transfer, the weld quality deteriorates with increasing welding speeds when the<br />

electrode is one wire diameter off joint centreline. The reduction in weld strength<br />

between a fillet weld made with zero wire offset and one made with the welding wire<br />

positioned one wire diameter off the joint was used to evaluate weld quality. For<br />

spray transfer, the author observed that the loss in strength was almost constant for<br />

the range of speeds studied, 305 to 610 mm/min (12 to 24 in. /min)<br />

Middle [ref. 105] suggests that designers should design welded parts to allow<br />

the greatest possible use of flat position welding, which has larger tolerances and the<br />

highest productivity rates. The same author proposed the adoption of design<br />

procedures such that increased joint fit-up and positioning tolerances could be<br />

obtained.<br />

2.5.2 Fixturing<br />

In section 2.5.1, fixturing tolerances have been included in the components'<br />

tolerance group. This, however, does not imply that fixturing tolerances are less<br />

important than the other contributing factors. Consistent welds require reproducible<br />

weld placement and welding conditions. The correct placement of a weld depends on<br />

the adequate joint positioning relative to the welding torch path. Consistent joint<br />

positioning, in its turn, depends on adequate fixturing, further to joint fit up.<br />

Widfeldt [ref. 104] suggests that for off-line programming, the design of<br />

fixtures should be made utilising the same CAD system as used for designing the<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!