19.06.2013 Views

Measuring the Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail: A Study

Measuring the Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail: A Study

Measuring the Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail: A Study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

passenger was approximately $120 in April and $160 in July (see Table 5-17). Additional<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> survey responses to this question follows.<br />

One potential economic benefit <strong>of</strong> passenger rail service that researchers could easily<br />

identify from <strong>the</strong> survey responses was <strong>the</strong> spending level <strong>of</strong> passengers at <strong>the</strong>ir destination, both<br />

total spending and <strong>the</strong> associated sales tax revenue. Table 5-31 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

average passenger spending level and <strong>the</strong> sales tax revenue for each “destination” station area.<br />

Researchers assigned a “destination” station to each survey record based on factors including <strong>the</strong><br />

boarding and alighting station and <strong>the</strong> passenger’s residential zip code. Destination stations with<br />

passenger spending responses were identified for 417 survey records in <strong>the</strong> April data set<br />

(96 percent) and for 531 records in <strong>the</strong> July data set (90 percent). Researchers computed <strong>the</strong><br />

average passenger spending level at each station per study period by using a midpoint value<br />

assigned to each range <strong>of</strong> spending given as choices on <strong>the</strong> survey form. Total spending was<br />

<strong>the</strong>n calculated by distributing <strong>the</strong> average spending level for each station across <strong>the</strong> FFY 2009<br />

boarding and alighting totals (see Table 3-4) for each station to ei<strong>the</strong>r peak or non-peak travel<br />

seasons. An adjustment was made to <strong>the</strong> passenger activity in Fort Worth to account for<br />

passengers transferring to <strong>the</strong> Texas Eagle, as <strong>the</strong> expenditures by <strong>the</strong>se passengers do not<br />

remain in <strong>the</strong> Fort Worth area. Table 5-31 also reports sales tax rates for each community served<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Heartland Flyer, provided by <strong>the</strong> Oklahoma Tax Commission and <strong>the</strong> Texas State<br />

Comptroller <strong>of</strong> Public Accounts. Researchers applied <strong>the</strong>se tax rates to <strong>the</strong> passenger spending<br />

figures to estimate <strong>the</strong> total sales tax revenue generated from passenger spending.<br />

Table 5-31: Spending and Sales Tax Revenue for Heartland Flyer Stations, FFY 2009<br />

Destination<br />

Station<br />

Tax Rate<br />

<strong>Passenger</strong> Spending<br />

Total Average<br />

Sales Tax Revenue<br />

Total Average<br />

Oklahoma City, OK 8.375% $5,876,150 $121.32 $454,097 $9.38<br />

Norman, OK 8.25% 1,493,464 118.78 113,821 9.05<br />

Pauls Valley, OK 9.0% 268,193 49.77 22,161 4.11<br />

Ardmore, OK 8.75% 797,612 87.71 64,176 7.06<br />

Gainesville, TX 8.25% 810,560 101.09 61,775 7.70<br />

Fort Worth, TX 8.25% 8,786,451 170.97 669,637 13.03<br />

Total -- 18,032,628 133.67 1,385,666 10.27<br />

Note: No survey records were identified with Purcell as <strong>the</strong> “destination” station.<br />

Researchers estimate that Heartland Flyer passengers spent approximately $18 million<br />

on lodging, meals, shopping, and entertainment on <strong>the</strong>ir trips. <strong>Passenger</strong> spending in<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!