Measuring the Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail: A Study
Measuring the Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail: A Study
Measuring the Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail: A Study
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
35. Corey, Canapary & Galanis Research. Capitol Corridor Satisfaction Survey-Wave#17 Final<br />
Report. Prepared for <strong>the</strong> Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority. Oakland, California,<br />
January 2008.<br />
36. California Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation. California State <strong>Rail</strong> Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18.<br />
Sacramento, California, March 2008.<br />
37. Transportation Research Board. In Pursuit <strong>of</strong> Speed: New Options for <strong>Intercity</strong> <strong>Passenger</strong><br />
Transport. Special Report No. 233. Washington, D. C., 1991.<br />
38. de Dios Ortuzar, J., and L.G. Willumsen. Modelling Transport, Third Edition. Wiley,<br />
Chichester, England, August 2004.<br />
39. Morikawa, T., M. Ben-Akiva, and K. Yamada. “Forecasting <strong>Intercity</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> Ridership Using<br />
Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Data.” Transportation Research Record, 1328,<br />
1991, pp. 30-35.<br />
40. Franke, M.W., and B.E. Hillblom. Report on Proposed Operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Passenger</strong> Train<br />
Service Between St. Louis and Southwest Missouri. Prepared by Amtrak for <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation. Chicago, Illinois, May 2007.<br />
41. Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. High Speed <strong>Rail</strong> Feasibility <strong>Study</strong><br />
Methodology Technical Report. Performed in association with Quandel Consultants, LLC.<br />
Submitted to <strong>the</strong> Rocky Mountain <strong>Rail</strong> Authority, October 2008.<br />
42. Tennessee Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation. Tennessee <strong>Rail</strong> System Plan, Task 4: Potential<br />
<strong>Intercity</strong> <strong>Passenger</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> Corridors. Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.<br />
43. Miller, J.S., and B.F. Thorn. “A Sketch Method for Forecasting <strong>Intercity</strong> <strong>Passenger</strong> <strong>Rail</strong><br />
Demand.” ITE Journal on <strong>the</strong> Web, January 2009, pp. 69-75.<br />
44. Schwieterman, J.P., and J. Sheidt. “Survey <strong>of</strong> Current High-Speed <strong>Rail</strong> Planning Efforts in<br />
<strong>the</strong> United States.” Transportation Research Record, 1995, 2007, pp. 27-34.<br />
45. Brand, D., Parody, T.E., Hsu, P.S., and K.F. Tierney. “Forecasting High-Speed <strong>Rail</strong><br />
Ridership.” Transportation Research Record, 1341, 1992, pp. 12-18.<br />
46. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation, Federal <strong>Rail</strong>road Administration. High-Speed Ground<br />
Transportation for America. FRA, Washington, D.C., 1997.<br />
47. Marshment, R., M. Court, M. Mantell, and D. Karapanagiotis. Patronage Forecast for <strong>the</strong><br />
Proposed High Speed <strong>Passenger</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> Service between Tulsa and Oklahoma City. Oklahoma<br />
Transportation Center. Norman, Oklahoma, July 2003.<br />
48. Horowitz, A.J., and D.D. Farmer. “Statewide Travel Forecasting Practice: A Critical<br />
Review.” Transportation Research Record, 1685, 1999, pp. 13-20.<br />
49. Cambridge Systematics and Mark Bradley Consulting. Bay-Area/California High-Speed<br />
<strong>Rail</strong> Ridership and Revenue Forecasting <strong>Study</strong>: Interregional Model System Development.<br />
Prepared for <strong>the</strong> Metropolitan Transportation Commission and <strong>the</strong> California High-Speed<br />
<strong>Rail</strong> Authority. August 2006.<br />
50. AECOM Consulting and Wilbur Smith Associates. Investment Grade Ridership <strong>Study</strong><br />
Summary Report. Prepared for <strong>the</strong> Florida High-Speed <strong>Rail</strong> Authority. November 2002.<br />
51. Schaller, B. On-Board and Intercept Transit Survey Techniques. Transit Cooperative<br />
Research Program, Syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> Transit Practice 63. Washington, D.C., 2005.<br />
52. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Travel Survey Manual. Prepared for U.S. Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Transportation and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C., June 1996.<br />
139