- Page 1:
1. Report No. SWUTC/10/169116-1 2.
- Page 5:
ABSTRACT In recent years, the polic
- Page 8 and 9:
LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 3-1: He
- Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION In i
- Page 13 and 14:
ail service along intercity corrido
- Page 15 and 16:
planning faces a variety of challen
- Page 17 and 18:
of travel (in the absence of rail s
- Page 19 and 20:
participate in the study. Throughou
- Page 21 and 22:
such as medical appointments or fun
- Page 23 and 24:
Heartland Flyer annually. Induced t
- Page 25 and 26:
Heartland Flyer identified in this
- Page 27:
DISCLAIMER The contents of this rep
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION In its Dece
- Page 33 and 34:
to Fort Worth intercity corridor wa
- Page 35:
• An overview of intercity passen
- Page 38 and 39:
passenger deficit for the year 1969
- Page 40 and 41:
In April 2009, the Federal Railroad
- Page 42 and 43:
conditions across the United States
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 2-2: State-Supported Routes i
- Page 46 and 47:
Oklahoma and Texas support service
- Page 48 and 49:
conducted by the Southeastern Wisco
- Page 50 and 51:
Discussion of State-Supported Rail
- Page 52 and 53:
• The 1993 Illinois Passenger Rai
- Page 54 and 55:
INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL PLANNING T
- Page 56 and 57:
Data Needs for Intercity Passenger
- Page 58 and 59:
supported routes. The following par
- Page 60 and 61:
• Third, the total non-business r
- Page 62 and 63:
demand model varies, Horowitz and F
- Page 64 and 65:
Survey Design Literature Deploying
- Page 66 and 67:
Table 2-4: Elements Included in On-
- Page 68 and 69:
question. This pattern is consisten
- Page 70 and 71:
a particular corridor. For example,
- Page 73 and 74:
CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF HEARTLAND
- Page 75 and 76:
• After passing through Davis, th
- Page 77 and 78:
minutes early. A later section of t
- Page 79 and 80:
corridor. Table 3-1 shows a snapsho
- Page 81 and 82:
enefits resulting from the route’
- Page 83 and 84:
state of Oklahoma (71). This action
- Page 85 and 86:
served by the route are Pauls Valle
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 3-4: Typical P42DC Locomotiv
- Page 89 and 90:
during non-peak times when the usua
- Page 91 and 92:
effect during this research study w
- Page 93 and 94:
HEARTLAND FLYER SERVICE DATA The fo
- Page 95 and 96:
Examining the 10-year monthly avera
- Page 97 and 98:
surprisingly, is Oklahoma City-Fort
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 3-9: Heartland Flyer On-Time
- Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 4: DATA COLLECTION The main
- Page 103 and 104:
amenities that could increase rail
- Page 105 and 106:
pool be increased to 3,000. The IRB
- Page 107 and 108:
Summary of Data Collection Tables 4
- Page 109 and 110:
Ineligible Passengers Several group
- Page 111 and 112:
QUALITY CONTROL After completing th
- Page 113 and 114: For the access mode to station ques
- Page 115 and 116: One question on the survey asked th
- Page 117 and 118: trip). However, researchers determi
- Page 119 and 120: eporting how far passengers were fr
- Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 5: DATA ANALYSIS This chapt
- Page 123 and 124: survey item by the total number of
- Page 125 and 126: Comparing the total column in Table
- Page 127 and 128: Tables 5-5 and 5-6 display another
- Page 129 and 130: Heartland Flyer Market Area Researc
- Page 131 and 132: Table 5-9: Passenger Trip Purpose,
- Page 133 and 134: PASSENGER CHARACTERISTICS Passenger
- Page 135 and 136: is entirely possible that a passeng
- Page 137 and 138: In both April and July, the two mos
- Page 139 and 140: Table 5-19: Passenger State of Resi
- Page 141 and 142: Figure 5-2: Residential Zip Codes o
- Page 143 and 144: Gender Table 5-22 reports passenger
- Page 145 and 146: Household Income Table 5-26 reports
- Page 147 and 148: In FFY 2009, the Heartland Flyer ra
- Page 149 and 150: Table 5-28: Passenger Alternatives
- Page 151 and 152: Urban and Rural Mobility Another co
- Page 153 and 154: passenger was approximately $120 in
- Page 155 and 156: if the service did not exist (appro
- Page 157: This study measured the mobility im
- Page 160 and 161: questions on the passenger’s boar
- Page 162 and 163: made is related to the similarity b
- Page 167 and 168: REFERENCES 1. National Surface Tran
- Page 169 and 170: 35. Corey, Canapary & Galanis Resea
- Page 171: 74. Able Consulting. Tier 1 Environ
- Page 174 and 175: Figure A-3: Purcell Amtrak Station
- Page 176 and 177: Figure A-7: Fort Worth Amtrak Stati
- Page 178 and 179: 148
- Page 180: 150