Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
94<br />
Chapter 5 Psychoanalysis<br />
most obvious example), the dream will attempt to accommodate this in order not to<br />
disturb the dreamer’s sleep. However, outside <strong>and</strong> inside stimulus of this sort is always<br />
transformed. As he explains, ‘Dreams do not simply reproduce the stimulus; they work<br />
it over, they make allusions to it, they include it in some context, they replace it by<br />
something else’ (125). An alarm clock, for example, may appear as the sound of church<br />
bells on a sunny Sunday morning or as the sound of the fire brigade rushing to the<br />
scene of a devastating fire. Therefore, although we can recognize how outside stimulation<br />
may contribute something to a dream, it does not explain why or how this something<br />
is worked over. Similarly, dreams are also informed by recent experiences, ‘the<br />
day’s residues’ (264). These may often determine much of the content of a dream, but,<br />
as Freud insists, this, as with noise <strong>and</strong> somatic disturbances, is merely the material out<br />
of which the dream is formulated <strong>and</strong> is not the same as the unconscious wish. As he<br />
explains, the ‘unconscious impulse is the true creator of the dream; it is what produces<br />
the psychical energy for the dream’s construction’ (1973b: 47).<br />
Dreams, according to Freud, are always a ‘compromise-structure’ (48). That is, a<br />
compromise between wishes emanating from the id <strong>and</strong> censorship enacted by the<br />
ego: ‘If the meaning of our dreams usually remains obscure to us . . . it is because<br />
[they contain] wishes of which we are ashamed; these we must conceal from ourselves,<br />
<strong>and</strong> they have consequently been repressed, pushed into the unconscious. Repressed<br />
wishes of this sort <strong>and</strong> their derivatives are only allowed to come to expression in a very<br />
distorted form’ (1985: 136). Censorship occurs but wishes are expressed; that is, they<br />
are coded in an attempt to elude censorship. According to Freud’s (1976) famous formulation,<br />
‘a dream is a (disguised) fulfilment of a (suppressed or repressed) wish’ (244).<br />
Dreams move between two levels: the latent dream thoughts (unconscious) <strong>and</strong> the<br />
manifest content (what the dreamer remembers dreaming). Dream analysis attempts<br />
to decode the manifest content in order to discover the ‘real meaning’ of the dream. To<br />
do this it has to decipher the different mechanisms that have translated latent dream<br />
thoughts into manifest content. He calls these mechanisms the ‘dream-work’ (2009:<br />
246). The dream-work consists of four processes: condensation, displacement, symbolization,<br />
<strong>and</strong> secondary revision. Each in turn produces ‘the transformation of<br />
thoughts into hallucinatory experience’ (1973a: 250).<br />
The manifest content is always smaller than the latent content. This is the result of<br />
condensation, which can work in three different ways: (i) latent elements are omitted;<br />
(ii) only part of a latent element arrives in the manifest content, <strong>and</strong> (iii) latent elements<br />
which have something in common are condensed into ‘composite structures’<br />
(2009: 247). ‘As a result of condensation, one element in the manifest dream may correspond<br />
to numerous elements in the latent dream-thoughts; but, conversely too, one<br />
element in the dream-thoughts may be represented by several images in [the manifest<br />
content of] the dream’ (1973b: 49). Freud provides the following example:<br />
You will have no difficulty in recalling instances from your own dreams of different<br />
people being condensed into a single one. A compromise figure of this kind<br />
may look like A perhaps, but may be dressed like B, may do something that we<br />
remember C doing, <strong>and</strong> at the same time we may know that he is D (2009: ibid.).