02.07.2013 Views

Cultural Theory and Popular Culture

Cultural Theory and Popular Culture

Cultural Theory and Popular Culture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

amounts to a Brechtian revolution in the making of films. 21 To produce a cinema no<br />

longer ‘obsessively subordinated to the neurotic needs of the male ego’ (18), it is necessary<br />

to break with illusionism, making the camera material, <strong>and</strong> producing in the<br />

audience ‘dialectics, passionate detachment’ (ibid.). Moreover, ‘[w]omen, whose image<br />

has continually been stolen <strong>and</strong> used for this end [objects of the male gaze], cannot<br />

view the decline of the traditional film form with anything much more than sentimental<br />

regret’ (ibid.). (For feminist criticisms of Mulvey’s argument, see Chapter 7).<br />

Slavoj 2i4ek <strong>and</strong> Lacanian fantasy<br />

Slavoj biaek <strong>and</strong> Lacanian fantasy 107<br />

Terry Eagleton describes the Slovenian critic Slavoj yizek ‘as the most formidably brilliant<br />

exponent of psychoanalysis, indeed of cultural theory in general, to have emerged<br />

in Europe for some decades (quoted in Myers, 2003: 1). Ian Parker (2004), on the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, claims that ‘[t]here is no theoretical system as such in yizek’s work, but it<br />

often seems as if there is one. . . . He does not actually add any specific concepts to<br />

those of other theorists but articulates <strong>and</strong> blends the concepts of others’ (115, 157).<br />

The three main influences on yizek’s work are the philosophy of Georg Wilhelm<br />

Friedrich Hegel, the politics of Marx <strong>and</strong> the psychoanalysis of Lacan. It is, however,<br />

the influence of Lacan that organizes the place of Marx <strong>and</strong> Hegel in his work. Whether<br />

we agree with Eagleton or Parker, what is true is that yizek is an interesting reader of<br />

texts (see, for example, yizek, 1991, 2009). In this short account, I will focus almost<br />

exclusively on his elaboration of the Lacanian notion of fantasy.<br />

Fantasy is not the same as illusion; rather, fantasy organizes how we see <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><br />

reality. It works as a frame through which we see <strong>and</strong> make sense of the world.<br />

Our fantasies are what make us unique; they provide us with our point of view; organizing<br />

how we see <strong>and</strong> experience the world around us. When the pop musician Jarvis<br />

Cocker (former lead singer with Pulp) appeared on BBC Radio 4’s long-running programme,<br />

Desert Isl<strong>and</strong> Discs (24 April 2005), he made this comment: ‘It doesn’t really<br />

matter where things happen, it’s kinda what’s going on in your head that makes life<br />

interesting.’ This is an excellent example of the organizing role of fantasy.<br />

yizek (1989) argues that ‘ “Reality” is a fantasy construction which enables us to<br />

mask the Real of our desire’ (45). Freud (1976) gives an account of a man who dreams<br />

that his dead son came to him to complain, ‘Can’t you see that I am burning?’ The<br />

father, Freud argues, is awoken by the overwhelming smell of burning. In other words,<br />

the outside stimulation (burning), which had been incorporated into the dream, had<br />

become too strong to be accommodated by the dream. According to yizek (1989),<br />

The Lacanian reading is directly opposed to this. The subject does not awake himself<br />

when the external irritation becomes too strong; the logic of his awakening is<br />

quite different. First he constructs a dream, a story which enables him to prolong his<br />

sleep, to avoid awakening into reality. But the thing that he encounters in the dream,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!